• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

土耳其语版下背部活动信心量表(LoBACS)的效度和信度

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Low Back Activity Confidence Scale (LoBACS).

作者信息

Solum Sezin, Salbaş Ender

机构信息

Bursa City Hospital, Turkey.

Balikesir University Medical Faculty, Turkey.

出版信息

Eval Health Prof. 2025 Sep;48(3):347-354. doi: 10.1177/01632787241307031. Epub 2024 Dec 10.

DOI:10.1177/01632787241307031
PMID:39657971
Abstract

The Low Back Activity Confidence Scale (LoBACS) is a 15-item scale designed to assess low back pain (LBP) through self-efficacy, a key predictor of functional recovery. This study aimed to culturally adapt and evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of LoBACS in patients with LBP. The translation and adaptation followed Beaton et al.'s protocol. Content and face validity were assessed with a pre-patient group. Both exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed to evaluate construct validity. Internal consistency, as well as test-retest reliability, were evaluated in a sample of 150 patients aged 18-70 years. Concurrent validity was measured alongside the Oswestry Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) and Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS). Two factors emerged from factor analysis, with item loadings for Functional Self-efficacy (FnSE) ranging from 0.745 to 0.896 and for Self-Regulatory and Exercise Self-efficacy (Self-Reg&ExSE) from 0.817 to 0.940. Cronbach's alpha was high for FnSE, Self-Reg&ExSE, and the total scale (α = 0.941). Total correlation for each item ranged between 0.770 and 0.925. Test-retest reliability was also high (r = 0.941, < .01). LoBACS showed moderate agreement with ODQ and QBPDS, demonstrating concurrent validity. In conclusion, the Turkish version of LoBACS is a valid and reliable tool for measuring LBP-related self-efficacy.

摘要

下背部活动信心量表(LoBACS)是一个包含15个条目的量表,旨在通过自我效能感来评估下背部疼痛(LBP),自我效能感是功能恢复的关键预测指标。本研究旨在对LoBACS土耳其语版本进行文化调适,并评估其在LBP患者中的有效性和可靠性。翻译和调适遵循Beaton等人的方案。通过一个预患者组评估内容效度和表面效度。进行探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA)以评估结构效度。在150名年龄在18至70岁的患者样本中评估内部一致性以及重测信度。与奥斯威斯瑞下背痛残疾问卷(ODQ)和魁北克下背痛残疾量表(QBPDS)一起测量同时效度。因素分析得出两个因素,功能自我效能感(FnSE)的项目载荷范围为0.745至0.896,自我调节和运动自我效能感(Self-Reg&ExSE)的项目载荷范围为0.817至0.940。FnSE、Self-Reg&ExSE以及总量表的克朗巴哈系数较高(α = 0.941)。每个条目的总相关性在0.770至0.925之间。重测信度也较高(r = 0.941,P <.01)。LoBACS与ODQ和QBPDS显示出中度一致性,证明了同时效度。总之,LoBACS土耳其语版本是测量与LBP相关自我效能感的有效且可靠的工具。

相似文献

1
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Low Back Activity Confidence Scale (LoBACS).土耳其语版下背部活动信心量表(LoBACS)的效度和信度
Eval Health Prof. 2025 Sep;48(3):347-354. doi: 10.1177/01632787241307031. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
2
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Dynamic Evaluation of Motor Speech Skill (DEMSS-TR) Test for Children With Speech Sound Disorders.土耳其语版运动性言语技能动态评估(DEMSS-TR)测试对语音障碍儿童的有效性和可靠性
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70067. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70067.
3
The Albanian version of the Oswestry Disability Index: translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability.阿尔巴尼亚语版奥斯威斯利残疾指数:翻译、跨文化调适、效度与信度
Disabil Rehabil. 2025 Jul;47(14):3714-3720. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2429751. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
4
Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the autism spectrum knowledge scale.自闭症谱系知识量表土耳其语版本的效度和信度研究
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2025 Jun 25;258:105204. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105204.
5
Validity and reliability of the Flare-OA scale for hip and knee osteoarthritis in a Turkish population: item reduction with Rasch analysis.土耳其人群中用于髋膝关节骨关节炎的Flare-OA量表的效度和信度:基于拉施分析的条目简化
Rheumatol Int. 2025 Jul 3;45(7):163. doi: 10.1007/s00296-025-05914-3.
6
Low back activity confidence scale: Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version in individuals with non-specific low back pain.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2025 Mar;38(2):208-219. doi: 10.1177/10538127241307068. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
7
Cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Turkish MIND diet adherence scale for young adults.土耳其年轻人MIND饮食依从性量表的文化适应性与心理测量学验证
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2181. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23181-6.
8
Translation, adaptation, and psychometric evaluation of the Burn-Specific Pain Anxiety Scale (BSPAS) for Czech patients with burn injuries.针对捷克烧伤患者的烧伤特异性疼痛焦虑量表(BSPAS)的翻译、改编及心理测量学评估。
Burns. 2025 Aug;51(6):107546. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2025.107546. Epub 2025 May 22.
9
Psychometric validation and measurement invariance of the self-compassion scale-short form (SCS-SF) across gender, clinical population, and cultures.自我同情量表简版(SCS-SF)在性别、临床人群和不同文化间的心理测量学验证及测量不变性
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 1;13(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03070-8.
10
Development and Psychometric Properties of Scale for Safe Pesticide Use Behaviors Assessment Based on the Health Belief Model.基于健康信念模型的安全农药使用行为评估量表的编制与心理测量学特性
J Agromedicine. 2025 Apr 3:1-14. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2025.2485929.