Ragnar Frisch Centre for Economic Research, Oslo 0349, Norway.
Centre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo 0473, Norway.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Oct 8;121(41):e2412017121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2412017121. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
Major initiatives attempt to prevent dementia by targeting modifiable risk factors. Low education is frequently pointed to, due to its relationship with dementia. Impact of education is difficult to assess, however, because of associations with multiple other factors, requiring large population-representative samples to tease the relationships apart. We studied 207,814 Norwegian men born between 1950 and 1959 who underwent compulsory cognitive testing during military conscription as young adults, to systematically test associations of education, cognition, and other important factors. Participants were grouped into five education levels and seven cognitive levels. A total of 1,521 were diagnosed with dementia between ages 60 and 69 y. While having compulsory education only was associated with increased risk (Hazard ratio [HR] = 1.37, CI: 1.17 to 1.60), this association was markedly attenuated when controlling for cognitive test scores (HR = 1.08, CI: 0.91 to 1.28). In contrast, low cognitive score was associated with double risk of later diagnosis, even when controlling for education (HR = 2.00, CI: 1.65 to 2.42). This relationship survived controlling for early-life socioeconomic status and replicated within pairs of brothers. This suggests that genetic and environmental factors shared within families, e.g., common genetics, parental education, socioeconomic status, or other shared experiences, cannot account for the association. Rather, independent, nonfamilial factors are more important. In contrast, within-family factors accounted for the relationship between low education and diagnosis risk. In conclusion, implementing measures to increase cognitive function in childhood and adolescence appears to be a more promising strategy for reducing dementia burden.
主要举措试图通过针对可改变的风险因素来预防痴呆症。由于受教育程度与痴呆症有关,因此经常提到受教育程度低的问题。但是,由于受多种其他因素的影响,教育的影响难以评估,这需要有大量的代表性人群样本才能将这些关系分开。我们研究了 207814 名出生于 1950 年至 1959 年的挪威男性,他们在年轻时接受了军事征兵的强制性认知测试,以系统地检验教育、认知和其他重要因素之间的关系。参与者被分为五个教育水平和七个认知水平组。共有 1521 人在 60 至 69 岁之间被诊断患有痴呆症。虽然只接受义务教育与风险增加有关(风险比[HR] = 1.37,CI:1.17 至 1.60),但在控制认知测试得分后,这种关联明显减弱(HR = 1.08,CI:0.91 至 1.28)。相比之下,即使在控制了教育程度后,认知评分较低也与以后的诊断风险增加两倍有关(HR = 2.00,CI:1.65 至 2.42)。这种关系在控制了早期生活社会经济地位后仍然存在,并在兄弟配对中得到了复制。这表明,家庭内部共同的遗传和环境因素(例如共同的遗传、父母的教育、社会经济地位或其他共同经历)无法解释这种关联。相反,独立的、非家庭因素更为重要。相反,家庭内部因素解释了低教育程度与诊断风险之间的关系。总之,实施措施提高儿童和青少年的认知功能似乎是减少痴呆症负担的更有前途的策略。