• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用智能跟踪技术与相关健康信息技术之间的互补性:纵向研究。

Harnessing the Power of Complementarity Between Smart Tracking Technology and Associated Health Information Technologies: Longitudinal Study.

机构信息

Department of Information Systems and Business Analytics, College of Business Administration, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Department of Management Science, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2024 Oct 1;8:e51198. doi: 10.2196/51198.

DOI:10.2196/51198
PMID:39353192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11480677/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Smart tracking technology (STT) that was applied for clinical use has the potential to reduce 30-day all-cause readmission risk through streamlining clinical workflows with improved accuracy, mobility, and efficiency. However, previously published literature has inadequately addressed the joint effects of STT for clinical use and its complementary health ITs (HITs) in this context. Furthermore, while previous studies have discussed the symbiotic and pooled complementarity effects among different HITs, there is a lack of evidence-based research specifically examining the complementarity effects between STT for clinical use and other relevant HITs.

OBJECTIVE

Through a complementarity theory lens, this study aims to examine the joint effects of STT for clinical use and 3 relevant HITs on 30-day all-cause readmission risk. These HITs are STT for supply chain management, mobile IT, and health information exchange (HIE). Specifically, this study examines whether the pooled complementarity effect exists between STT for clinical use and STT for supply chain management, and whether symbiotic complementarity effects exist between STT for clinical use and mobile IT and between STT for clinical use and HIE.

METHODS

This study uses a longitudinal in-patient dataset, including 879,122 in-patient hospital admissions for 347,949 patients in 61 hospitals located in Florida and New York in the United States, from 2014 to 2015. Logistic regression was applied to assess the effect of HITs on readmission risks. Time and hospital fixed effects were controlled in the regression model. Robust standard errors (SEs) were used to account for potential heteroskedasticity. These errors were further clustered at the patient level to consider possible correlations within the patient groups.

RESULTS

The interaction between STT for clinical use and STT for supply chain management, mobile IT, and HIE was negatively associated with 30-day readmission risk, with coefficients of -0.0352 (P=.003), -0.0520 (P<.001), and -0.0216 (P=.04), respectively. These results indicate that the pooled complementarity effect exists between STT for clinical use and STT for supply chain management, and symbiotic complementarity effects exist between STT for clinical use and mobile IT and between STT for clinical use and HIE. Furthermore, the joint effects of these HITs varied depending on the hospital affiliation and patients' disease types.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results reveal that while individual HIT implementations have varying impacts on 30-day readmission risk, their joint effects are often associated with a reduction in 30-day readmission risk. This study substantially contributes to HIT value literature by quantifying the complementarity effects among 4 different types of HITs: STT for clinical use, STT for supply chain management, mobile IT, and HIE. It further offers practical implications for hospitals to maximize the benefits of their complementary HITs in reducing the 30-day readmission risk in their respective care scenarios.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa9f/11480677/0e785380252e/formative_v8i1e51198_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa9f/11480677/093a4b9bac2d/formative_v8i1e51198_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa9f/11480677/94ba82ddff9f/formative_v8i1e51198_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa9f/11480677/367a108bc6ae/formative_v8i1e51198_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa9f/11480677/0e785380252e/formative_v8i1e51198_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa9f/11480677/093a4b9bac2d/formative_v8i1e51198_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa9f/11480677/94ba82ddff9f/formative_v8i1e51198_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa9f/11480677/367a108bc6ae/formative_v8i1e51198_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa9f/11480677/0e785380252e/formative_v8i1e51198_fig4.jpg
摘要

背景

智能跟踪技术(STT)已应用于临床,通过提高准确性、移动性和效率来简化临床工作流程,从而有可能降低 30 天全因再入院风险。然而,先前发表的文献未能充分探讨 STT 在临床应用及其互补性健康信息技术(HIT)在此背景下的联合效应。此外,虽然先前的研究讨论了不同 HIT 之间的共生和综合互补效应,但缺乏专门研究 STT 在临床应用与其他相关 HIT 之间互补效应的循证研究。

目的

本研究旨在通过互补性理论视角,考察 STT 在临床应用与 3 种相关 HIT(STT 用于供应链管理、移动 IT 和健康信息交换(HIE))联合使用对 30 天全因再入院风险的影响。具体而言,本研究检验了 STT 在临床应用与 STT 用于供应链管理之间是否存在综合互补效应,以及 STT 在临床应用与移动 IT 之间以及 STT 在临床应用与 HIE 之间是否存在共生互补效应。

方法

本研究使用了一项纵向住院患者数据集,其中包括来自美国佛罗里达州和纽约州 61 家医院的 347949 名患者的 879122 例住院患者数据,数据采集时间为 2014 年至 2015 年。本研究采用逻辑回归评估 HIT 对再入院风险的影响。回归模型中控制了时间和医院固定效应。采用稳健标准误差(SE)来考虑潜在的异方差性。这些误差进一步在患者层面进行聚类,以考虑患者群体内部的可能相关性。

结果

STT 在临床应用与 STT 用于供应链管理、移动 IT 和 HIE 之间的相互作用与 30 天再入院风险呈负相关,其系数分别为-0.0352(P=.003)、-0.0520(P<.001)和-0.0216(P=.04)。这些结果表明,STT 在临床应用与 STT 用于供应链管理之间存在综合互补效应,而 STT 在临床应用与移动 IT 之间以及 STT 在临床应用与 HIE 之间存在共生互补效应。此外,这些 HIT 的联合效应因医院隶属关系和患者疾病类型而异。

结论

本研究结果表明,虽然个别 HIT 的实施对 30 天再入院风险有不同的影响,但它们的联合效应往往与降低 30 天再入院风险相关。本研究通过量化 4 种不同类型的 HIT(STT 在临床应用、STT 用于供应链管理、移动 IT 和 HIE)之间的互补效应,为 HIT 价值文献做出了重要贡献。它还为医院提供了实际意义,帮助他们在各自的护理场景中最大限度地发挥互补性 HIT 的效益,降低 30 天再入院风险。

相似文献

1
Harnessing the Power of Complementarity Between Smart Tracking Technology and Associated Health Information Technologies: Longitudinal Study.利用智能跟踪技术与相关健康信息技术之间的互补性:纵向研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Oct 1;8:e51198. doi: 10.2196/51198.
2
Health information exchange, Health Information Technology use, and hospital readmission rates.健康信息交换、健康信息技术的使用与医院再入院率。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011;2011:644-53. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
3
Impact of Hospital Characteristics and Governance Structure on the Adoption of Tracking Technologies for Clinical and Supply Chain Use: Longitudinal Study of US Hospitals.医院特征和治理结构对临床和供应链使用追踪技术采用的影响:对美国医院的纵向研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 26;24(5):e33742. doi: 10.2196/33742.
4
Review of successful hospital readmission reduction strategies and the role of health information exchange.成功的医院再入院率降低策略及健康信息交换的作用综述
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Aug;104:97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 May 20.
5
Health systems' use of enterprise health information exchange vs single electronic health record vendor environments and unplanned readmissions.医疗体系对企业健康信息交换与单一电子健康记录供应商环境的使用,与非计划性再入院率。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Oct 1;26(10):989-998. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz116.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
The impact of EHR and HIE on reducing avoidable admissions: controlling main differential diagnoses.电子健康档案和健康信息交换对降低可避免住院的影响:控制主要鉴别诊断。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Apr 17;13:49. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-49.
8
The Effectiveness of Health Care Information Technologies: Evaluation of Trust, Security Beliefs, and Privacy as Determinants of Health Care Outcomes.医疗信息技术的有效性:对信任、安全信念及隐私作为医疗结果决定因素的评估
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 11;20(4):e107. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9014.
9
Is Electronic Information Exchange Associated With Lower 30-Day Readmission Charges Among Medicare Beneficiaries?电子信息交换是否与医疗保险受益人的 30 天再入院费用降低有关?
Med Care. 2024 Jun 1;62(6):423-430. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002003. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
10
The Impact of Health Information Exchange on In-Hospital and Postdischarge Mortality in Older Adults with Alzheimer Disease Readmitted to a Different Hospital Within 30 Days of Discharge: Cohort Study of Medicare Beneficiaries.健康信息交换对出院30天内再次入住不同医院的阿尔茨海默病老年患者住院期间及出院后死亡率的影响:医疗保险受益人的队列研究
JMIR Aging. 2023 Mar 10;6:e41936. doi: 10.2196/41936.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Hospital Characteristics and Governance Structure on the Adoption of Tracking Technologies for Clinical and Supply Chain Use: Longitudinal Study of US Hospitals.医院特征和治理结构对临床和供应链使用追踪技术采用的影响:对美国医院的纵向研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 26;24(5):e33742. doi: 10.2196/33742.
2
Early Prediction of Unplanned 30-Day Hospital Readmission: Model Development and Retrospective Data Analysis.非计划30天再入院的早期预测:模型开发与回顾性数据分析
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Mar 23;9(3):e16306. doi: 10.2196/16306.
3
Smart hospital infrastructure: geomagnetic in-hospital medical worker tracking.
智慧医院基础设施:地磁式院内医护人员追踪。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Mar 1;28(3):477-486. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa204.
4
Mitigating staff risk in the workplace: the use of RFID technology during a COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.减轻工作场所员工风险:在COVID-19大流行期间及之后使用射频识别技术。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2020 Nov;27(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100230.
5
Excess Medical Care Spending: The Categories, Magnitude, and Opportunity Costs of Wasteful Spending in the United States.过度医疗支出:美国浪费性支出的类别、规模和机会成本。
Am J Public Health. 2020 Dec;110(12):1743-1748. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305865. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
6
Health information exchange between hospital and skilled nursing facilities not associated with lower readmissions.医院与专门护理机构之间的健康信息交换与再入院率的降低无关。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec;54(6):1335-1345. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13210. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
7
Waste in the US Health Care System: Estimated Costs and Potential for Savings.美国医疗体系中的浪费:估计成本和节约潜力。
JAMA. 2019 Oct 15;322(15):1501-1509. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.13978.
8
Health systems' use of enterprise health information exchange vs single electronic health record vendor environments and unplanned readmissions.医疗体系对企业健康信息交换与单一电子健康记录供应商环境的使用,与非计划性再入院率。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Oct 1;26(10):989-998. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz116.
9
Identifying Patient Readmissions: Are Our Data Sources Misleading?识别患者再入院:我们的数据来源是否存在误导?
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Aug;20(8):1042-1044. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.04.028. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
10
Unintended Consequences of Nationwide Electronic Health Record Adoption: Challenges and Opportunities in the Post-Meaningful Use Era.全国范围内采用电子健康记录的意外后果:有意义使用后时代的挑战与机遇。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 3;21(6):e13313. doi: 10.2196/13313.