Clinical effects of hybrid debranching technique for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND

To investigate the clinical effects and safety of the hybrid debranching technique for patients with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (AD).

METHODS

One hundred nine patients with acute Stanford type a AD were selected and divided into observation group and control group according to the different surgical methods. Fifty-five patients in the observation group were treated with hybrid debranching, and 54 patients in the control group were treated with Sun's operation. The operation duration, clamp time, cardiopulmonary bypass duration, volume of blood transfusion, ventilator application duration, duration of stay in the intensive care unit, aortic rupture, second thoracotomy due to hemorrhage, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, stroke, paraplegia, renal failure, and all-cause mortality were recorded. Postoperative follow-up was conducted. The number of cases that underwent follow-up and the number of cases with complete thrombosis of the false aneurysm cavity detected by computed tomography angiography (CTA) was recorded.

RESULTS

The surgical success rate was 100% in both groups, and there were no cases with unplanned secondary surgery. Compared with the control group, only the difference in the volume of blood transfusion was not significantly significant between the two groups (P = 0.052), while the rest of the observation indicators were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.001 for all). The proportion of cases with complete thrombosis of the false aneurysm cavity was significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group at 3 and 6 months after surgery (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In patients with acute Stanford type A AD involving the arch, the hybrid debranching technique was safe and effective. It was recommended for patients with advanced age and a high risk of intolerance to deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.