Ito Riyaka, Igawa Tatsuya, Urata Ryunosuke, Ito Shomaru, Suzuki Kosuke, Takahashi Hiroto, Toda Mika, Fujita Mio, Kubo Akira
Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of International University of Health and Welfare: 2600-1 Kitakanemaru, Ohtawara-shi, Tochigi 323-8501, Japan.
Department of Rehabilitation, International University of Health and Welfare Hospital, Japan.
J Phys Ther Sci. 2024 Oct;36(10):628-632. doi: 10.1589/jpts.36.628. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
[Purpose] This study aimed to determine the effects of simultaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and static stretching on flexibility and muscle strength. [Participants and Methods] A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 96 healthy university students equally assigned to either a simultaneous NMES and static stretching group (Group S) or an NMES-only group (Group C). The gastrocnemius muscle was the target of both NMES and static stretching. Ankle dorsiflexion angle (DFA), forward flexion distance (FFD), and ankle plantar flexor strength (PFS) were measured before and directly following intervention. Outcomes in the two groups were evaluated using two-way analysis of variance. [Results] A significant time effect was observed for both DFA and FFD, whereas a significant interaction effect was observed for FFD only. Improvements in DFA were similar between the groups; however, improvements in FFD were significantly greater in Group S. PFS showed no significant interaction between the group and the time factor. [Conclusion] Our findings suggest that simultaneous intervention enhances flexibility. Despite targeting the gastrocnemius muscle, the observed improvement in hamstring flexibility may have been because of fascial connections. These findings support the efficacy and safety of NMES combined with static stretching for increasing flexibility.
[目的] 本研究旨在确定同步神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)和静态拉伸对柔韧性和肌肉力量的影响。[参与者与方法] 对96名健康大学生进行了一项随机对照试验,将他们平均分为同步NMES和静态拉伸组(S组)或仅接受NMES组(C组)。腓肠肌是NMES和静态拉伸的共同作用目标。在干预前和干预后即刻测量踝关节背屈角度(DFA)、前屈距离(FFD)和踝关节跖屈肌力量(PFS)。使用双向方差分析评估两组的结果。[结果] DFA和FFD均观察到显著的时间效应,而仅FFD观察到显著的交互效应。两组DFA的改善情况相似;然而,S组FFD的改善明显更大。PFS在组间和时间因素之间未显示出显著的交互作用。[结论] 我们的研究结果表明,同步干预可提高柔韧性。尽管针对的是腓肠肌,但观察到的腘绳肌柔韧性改善可能是由于筋膜连接。这些结果支持了NMES联合静态拉伸增加柔韧性的有效性和安全性。