Mittal Manika, Bajaj Nitika, Bhola Meenu, Brar Gurlal S
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Dasmesh Institute of Research and Dental Sciences, Faridkot, Punjab, India.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 May;17(5):570-575. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2861.
The purpose of the present study was to compare the clinical efficacy of GC Gold Label IX, GC Gold Label IX Extra, and GC Gold Label Hybrid in occlusal surface cavities in primary molars prepared by hand instrumentation technique.
Ninety primary molars were selected from the children according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The selected teeth were randomly allocated into the following three groups, with 30 teeth in each group, according to the restorative material used: group I: GC Gold Label IX, group II: GC Gold Label IX Extra, and group III: GC Gold Label Hybrid. Occlusal cavities were prepared using hand instruments. Caries removal efficacy was verified using caries detector dye. The restorative materials were mixed and condensed into the prepared cavities. The restorations were assessed using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) evaluation criteria at 1, 3, and 6 months.
The results were tabulated and statistically analyzed using the Chi-squared test. No significant difference was found in terms of color match, marginal discoloration, marginal integrity, surface roughness, and secondary caries, but a significant difference was observed in terms of retention and anatomic form between group I and group III.
GC Gold Label Hybrid exhibited better clinical performance with respect to GC Gold Label IX and comparable clinical performance with respect to GC Gold Label IX Extra.
GC Gold Label Hybrid is a newly developed glass ionomer cement (GIC), and its clinical performance needs to be studied.
Mittal M, Bajaj N, Bhola M, Comparative Evaluation of GC Gold Label IX with GC Gold Label IX Extra and GC Gold Label Hybrid in Cavitated Lesions Prepared by Hand Instrumentation Technique in Primary Molars: An Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(5):570-575.
本研究旨在比较GC金标IX型、GC金标IX型加强版和GC金标混合型材料在手工器械制备的乳磨牙咬合面窝洞中的临床疗效。
根据纳入和排除标准从儿童中选取90颗乳磨牙。根据所使用的修复材料，将所选牙齿随机分为以下三组，每组30颗牙：第一组：GC金标IX型；第二组：GC金标IX型加强版；第三组：GC金标混合型。使用手工器械制备咬合面窝洞。用龋病检测染料验证龋病去除效果。将修复材料混合并填入制备好的窝洞中。在1、3和6个月时使用改良的美国公共卫生服务（USPHS）评估标准对修复体进行评估。
将结果列表并用卡方检验进行统计分析。在颜色匹配、边缘变色、边缘完整性、表面粗糙度和继发龋方面未发现显著差异，但在第一组和第三组之间的固位和解剖形态方面观察到显著差异。
与GC金标IX型相比，GC金标混合型表现出更好的临床性能，与GC金标IX型加强版相比具有相当的临床性能。
GC金标混合型是一种新开发的玻璃离子水门汀（GIC），其临床性能需要研究。
米塔尔M、巴贾杰N、博拉M，《手工器械制备乳磨牙龋损中GC金标IX型与GC金标IX型加强版及GC金标混合型的比较评价：一项研究》。《国际临床儿科牙科学杂志》2024；17（5）：570 - 575。
