• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
improving Pain mAnagement for childreN and young people attendeD by Ambulance (PANDA): protocol for a realist review.改善救护车接诊的儿童和青少年的疼痛管理(PANDA):一项实效评价方案
NIHR Open Res. 2025 Jan 30;4:42. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13627.2. eCollection 2024.
2
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
3
Developing a role for patients and the public in the implementation of health and social care research evidence into practice: the PIPER study (Pathways to Implementation for Public Engagement in Research) realist evaluation protocol.让患者和公众在将健康与社会护理研究证据转化为实践中发挥作用:PIPER研究(公众参与研究的实施途径)的实在论评价方案。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 14;11(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00728-w.
4
Factors within the clinical encounter that impact upon risk assessment within child and adolescent mental health services: a rapid realist synthesis.临床接触中的影响儿童和青少年心理健康服务风险评估的因素:快速现实主义综合评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jan;12(1):1-107. doi: 10.3310/VKTY5822.
5
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
6
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
7
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
8
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
Reducing health inequalities through general practice: a realist review and action framework.通过全科医疗减少健康不平等:一个现实主义综述和行动框架。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Mar;12(7):1-104. doi: 10.3310/YTWW7032.
10
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
A realist review of medication optimisation of community dwelling service users with serious mental illness.对患有严重精神疾病的社区居住服务使用者药物优化的现实主义综述。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Dec 13;34(1):40-52. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016615.
2
Applying and reporting relevance, richness and rigour in realist evidence appraisals: Advancing key concepts in realist reviews.在真实主义评价中应用和报告相关性、丰富性和严谨性:推进真实主义综述的关键概念。
Res Synth Methods. 2023 May;14(3):504-514. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1630. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
3
Improving ambulance care for children suffering acute pain: a qualitative interview study.提高救护车对急性疼痛儿童的护理水平:一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Jun 3;22(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00648-y.
4
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架:对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
5
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
6
Relationship between acute pain trajectories after an emergency department visit and chronic pain: a Canadian prospective cohort study.急诊科就诊后急性疼痛轨迹与慢性疼痛的关系:一项加拿大前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 7;10(12):e040390. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040390.
7
Delivering transformative action in paediatric pain: a Lancet Child & Adolescent Health Commission.在儿童疼痛领域采取变革性行动:《柳叶刀儿童与青少年健康》委员会
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2021 Jan;5(1):47-87. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30277-7. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
8
Access to Pain Management as a Human Right.将疼痛管理作为一项人权来对待。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Jan;109(1):61-65. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304743.
9
Realist review protocol for understanding the real-world barriers and enablers to practitioners implementing self-management support to people living with and beyond cancer.真实世界研究方案,旨在理解实践者在为癌症患者及康复者提供自我管理支持时所面临的实际障碍和促进因素。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 3;10(9):e037636. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037636.
10
The predictors, barriers and facilitators to effective management of acute pain in children by emergency medical services: A systematic mixed studies review.急救医疗服务中有效管理儿童急性疼痛的预测因素、障碍和促进因素:系统混合研究综述。
J Child Health Care. 2021 Sep;25(3):481-503. doi: 10.1177/1367493520949427. Epub 2020 Aug 26.

改善救护车接诊的儿童和青少年的疼痛管理(PANDA):一项实效评价方案

improving Pain mAnagement for childreN and young people attendeD by Ambulance (PANDA): protocol for a realist review.

作者信息

Nicholls Georgie, Eaton Georgette, Ortega Marishona, Sumera Kacper, Baliousis Michael, Hodgson Jessica, Laparidou Despina, Siriwardena Aloysius Niroshan, Leighton Paul, Redsell Sarah, Lord Bill, Bujor Tatiana, Whitley Gregory Adam

机构信息

Community and Health Research Unit, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, England, LN6 7FS, UK.

London Ambulance Service NHS Trust, London, England, SE1 8SD, UK.

出版信息

NIHR Open Res. 2025 Jan 30;4:42. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13627.2. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3310/nihropenres.13627.2
PMID:39355302
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11443194/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Each year in England, 450,000 children and young people (CYP) under 18 years of age are transported by ambulance to emergency departments. Approximately 20% of these suffer acute pain caused by illness or injury. Pain is a highly complex sensory and emotional experience. The intersection between acute pain, unwell CYP and the unpredictable pre-hospital environment is convoluted. Studies have shown that prehospital pain management in CYP is poor, with 61% of those suffering acute pain not achieving effective pain relief (abolition or reduction of pain score by 2 or more out of 10) when attended by ambulance. Consequences of poor acute pain management include altered pain perception, post-traumatic stress disorder and the development of chronic pain. This realist review will aim to understand how ambulance clinicians can provide improved prehospital acute pain management for CYP.

METHODS

A realist review will be conducted in accordance with the Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) guidance. A five-stage approach will be adopted; 1) Developing an Initial Programme Theory (IPT): develop an IPT with key stakeholder input and evidence from informal searching; 2) Searching and screening: conduct a thorough search of relevant research databases and other literature sources and perform screening in duplicate; 3) Relevance and rigour assessment: assess documents for relevance and rigour in duplicate; 4) Extracting and organising data: code relevant data into conceptual "buckets" using qualitative data analysis software; and 5) Synthesis and Programme Theory (PT) refinement: utilise a realist logic of analysis to generate context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) within and across conceptual "buckets", test and refine the IPT into a realist PT.

CONCLUSION

The realist PT will enhance our understanding of what works best to improve acute prehospital pain management in CYP, which will then be tested and refined within a realist evaluation.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO Registration: CRD42024505978.

摘要

背景

在英格兰,每年有45万名18岁以下的儿童和青少年(CYP)被救护车送往急诊科。其中约20%的人因疾病或受伤而遭受急性疼痛。疼痛是一种高度复杂的感官和情感体验。急性疼痛、身体不适的CYP与不可预测的院前环境之间的交叉情况错综复杂。研究表明,CYP的院前疼痛管理较差,在由救护车接诊时,61%遭受急性疼痛的人未能实现有效的疼痛缓解(疼痛评分降低2分或更多,满分10分)。急性疼痛管理不善的后果包括疼痛感知改变、创伤后应激障碍以及慢性疼痛的发展。本实证性综述旨在了解救护车临床医生如何为CYP提供更好的院前急性疼痛管理。

方法

将根据实证性和元叙事证据综合:不断发展的标准(RAMESES)指南进行实证性综述。将采用五阶段方法;1)制定初始项目理论(IPT):在关键利益相关者的参与下,根据非正式检索的证据制定IPT;2)检索和筛选:对相关研究数据库和其他文献来源进行全面检索,并进行双人筛选;3)相关性和严谨性评估:对文件进行双人相关性和严谨性评估;4)提取和整理数据:使用定性数据分析软件将相关数据编码到概念性“桶”中;5)综合和项目理论(PT)完善:利用实证性分析逻辑在概念性“桶”内和跨概念性“桶”生成背景-机制-结果配置(CMOC),将IPT测试并完善为实证性PT。

结论

实证性PT将增强我们对改善CYP院前急性疼痛管理的最佳方法的理解,然后在实证性评估中对其进行测试和完善。

注册

PROSPERO注册:CRD42024505978。