Sorte Smita R, Rathod Sachin B, Chatur Dipali K, Dhanvijay Anup Kumar D
Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Nagpur, IND.
Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Raipur, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Sep 1;16(9):e68391. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68391. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted traditional educational methods, forcing medical institutes to adapt to online classes. Since online teaching was an untested approach in Indian medical education, student feedback was essential. This study compares synchronous online lectures with traditional classroom lectures from the students' perspective. Method The cross-sectional study was conducted on undergraduate medical students across India undergoing synchronous online MBBS classes during the COVID-19 pandemic. After obtaining institutional ethical clearance, five-section questionnaires via Google Forms were circulated on WhatsApp and Facebook. The generated quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and frequency analysis. Result Out of 341 responses, 64 students did not consent and were excluded, resulting in 277 responses for analysis. The total score for traditional face-to-face lectures was 11.61 out of 15, with a percentage mean score of 77%, highlighting the significant positive influence of instructor presence and a conducive learning environment. In contrast, synchronous online lectures had a total score of 16.01 out of 25, with a percentage mean score of 64.04%, reflecting mixed responses. The Student's t-test analysis underscored the significant advantages of face-to-face interactions and structured learning environments in traditional classroom settings despite the flexibility and independence offered by synchronous online lectures. Conclusion The findings of this study reveal that students have a moderate level of satisfaction with synchronous online lectures, as indicated by a mean score of 64.04%. While these lectures provide flexibility and promote independence, they require students to exhibit higher levels of self-motivation, discipline, and self-directed learning. However, the online format poses challenges for effective communication and technical issues. Addressing the challenges of technology use, teacher training, and student engagement can enhance the effectiveness of online teaching and ensure that it complements traditional teaching methods, ultimately promoting pedagogical resilience in medical education.
引言
新冠疫情严重扰乱了传统教育方式,迫使医学院校适应在线课程。由于在线教学在印度医学教育中是一种未经检验的方法,学生反馈至关重要。本研究从学生的角度比较了同步在线讲座与传统课堂讲座。
方法
这项横断面研究针对印度各地在新冠疫情期间参加同步在线医学学士课程的本科医学生进行。获得机构伦理批准后,通过谷歌表单制作的五部分问卷在WhatsApp和Facebook上分发。使用描述性统计和频率分析对生成的定量数据进行分析。
结果
在341份回复中,64名学生不同意参与并被排除,最终有277份回复用于分析。传统面对面讲座的总分在15分中为11.61分,平均得分百分比为77%,突出了教师在场和良好学习环境的显著积极影响。相比之下,同步在线讲座的总分在25分中为16.01分,平均得分百分比为64.04%,反映出不同的反馈。学生t检验分析强调了传统课堂环境中面对面互动和结构化学习环境的显著优势,尽管同步在线讲座提供了灵活性和独立性。
结论
本研究结果表明,学生对同步在线讲座的满意度处于中等水平,平均得分为64.04%。虽然这些讲座提供了灵活性并促进了独立性,但它们要求学生表现出更高水平的自我激励、自律和自主学习能力。然而,在线形式在有效沟通和技术问题方面带来了挑战。解决技术使用、教师培训和学生参与方面的挑战可以提高在线教学的有效性,并确保其补充传统教学方法,最终促进医学教育中的教学适应能力。