Suppr超能文献

重症监护医学学院(CICM)学员研究项目建议:一项改良德尔菲研究。

Recommendations for the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM) trainee research project: A modified Delphi study.

作者信息

Ho Ariel, Denny Kerina J, Laupland Kevin B, Ramanan Mahesh, Tabah Alexis, McCullough James, Schults Jessica A, Raman Sainath

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, Gold Coast University Hospital, Queensland, Australia.

Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Crit Care Resusc. 2024 Jun 27;26(3):169-175. doi: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2024.05.002. eCollection 2024 Sep.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the perceived barriers and enablers to efficient completion of the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM) of Australia and New Zealand Formal Project - a trainee research project mandated for award of CICM Fellowship - and to develop consensus-based recommendations to support Intensive Care trainees and supervisors.

DESIGN

A two-stage modified Delphi study was conducted. In stage one, an anonymous electronic survey was distributed with three targeted open-ended questions relating to perceived key steps, barriers to, and improvements for efficient completion of the Formal Project. A thematic analysis used the survey results to generate a list of close-ended questions.In stage two, a consensus panel comprising of 30 panellists including CICM trainees, Formal Project supervisors and assessors, and critical care researchers, underwent a Delphi process with two rounds of voting and discussion to generate consensus-based recommendations.

SETTING

Surveys were distributed to Intensive Care Units across Australia and New Zealand. The consensus panel convened at the Queensland Critical Care Research Network Annual Scientific Meeting in Redcliffe, Queensland, Australia, on 9 June 2023.

PARTICIPANTS

CICM trainees, Formal Project supervisors and assessors, and critical care researchers in Australia and New Zealand.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Consensus-based recommendations for the CICM Formal Project.

RESULTS

We received 88 responses from the stage one survey. Stage two finalised 22 consensus-based recommendations, centring on key steps of the research process, resources for trainees, and support and training for supervisors.

CONCLUSIONS

Twenty-two recommendations were developed aiming to make the process of completing the mandatory CICM research project more efficient, and to improve the quality of research produced from these projects.

摘要

目的

确定澳大利亚和新西兰重症医学学院(CICM)正式项目高效完成的感知障碍和促进因素——这是一个获得CICM研究员资格所需的学员研究项目——并制定基于共识的建议以支持重症医学学员和导师。

设计

进行了两阶段的改良德尔菲研究。在第一阶段,分发了一份匿名电子调查问卷,其中包含三个针对性的开放式问题,涉及正式项目高效完成的关键步骤、障碍和改进措施。采用主题分析利用调查结果生成一系列封闭式问题。在第二阶段,由30名小组成员组成的共识小组,包括CICM学员、正式项目导师和评估人员以及重症医学研究人员,经历了两轮投票和讨论的德尔菲过程,以生成基于共识的建议。

背景

调查问卷分发给澳大利亚和新西兰的重症监护病房。共识小组于2023年6月9日在澳大利亚昆士兰州雷德克里夫举行的昆士兰重症医学研究网络年度科学会议上召开会议。

参与者

澳大利亚和新西兰的CICM学员、正式项目导师和评估人员以及重症医学研究人员。

主要观察指标

针对CICM正式项目的基于共识的建议。

结果

我们从第一阶段调查中收到了88份回复。第二阶段最终确定了22条基于共识的建议,重点围绕研究过程的关键步骤、学员资源以及导师的支持和培训。

结论

制定了22条建议,旨在提高完成强制性CICM研究项目的效率,并提高这些项目产生的研究质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd19/11440065/eac2fc897539/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验