Suppr超能文献

一项关于评估外阴硬化性苔藓治疗效果的结局指标的系统评价及患者优先事项评估。

A systematic review of outcome measures evaluating treatment efficacy in vulval lichen sclerosus and evaluation of patients' priorities.

作者信息

Jasionowska Sara, Almadori Aurora, Goble Mary, Langridge Benjamin J, Iakovou Despoina, Kamel Fady, McKenzie Milla, Mclean Allan, Boyle Deborah, Zenner Nicole, Swale Victoria, Butler Peter E M

机构信息

Charles Wolfson Centre for Reconstructive Surgery Royal Free Hospital London UK.

Department of Plastic Surgery Royal Free Hospital London UK.

出版信息

Skin Health Dis. 2024 Jul 5;4(5):e422. doi: 10.1002/ski2.422. eCollection 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Vulval lichen sclerosus (VLS) is an inflammatory skin disease characterised by itching, apareunia, loss of vulval architecture and scarring. Heterogeneity in outcome reporting precludes comparison between treatments. This study aimed to systematically review outcome measures used to evaluate the efficacy of VLS treatments and present patients' treatment priorities. This review followed the PRISMA guidelines using a registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42022356738). Multiple databases were searched, along with grey literature on Clinicaltrials.gov, European Union Clinical Trials and International Standard Randomised controlled trial (RCT) registries. All RCTs assessing any treatment for VLS were eligible for inclusion. A total of 775 patients were assessed across 21 RCTs. The assessment tools reported outcomes in the following domains: patient-reported symptoms assessed with one validated scale in 12 studies and seven non-validated scales in nine studies; sexual function with validated female sexual function index and female sexual distress scale in two studies and two non-validated scales in two studies; quality of life with three validated scales in three studies and clinician-reported objective outcomes with two validated scales in three studies and six non-validated scales in fourteen studies. Histological changes were assessed in 10 studies and tissue biomechanics in one study. We also carried out an online survey completed by 809 women with VLS to assess their research and disease treatment priorities and identified validated outcome measures to assess these. There is high variability in assessing treatment outcomes for VLS. We identified validated assessment tools which could be implemented in VLS studies to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments.

摘要

外阴硬化性苔藓(VLS)是一种炎症性皮肤病,其特征为瘙痒、性交困难、外阴结构丧失和瘢痕形成。结果报告的异质性使得不同治疗方法之间难以进行比较。本研究旨在系统回顾用于评估VLS治疗效果的结局指标,并呈现患者的治疗优先事项。本综述遵循PRISMA指南,采用注册方案(PROSPERO:CRD42022356738)。检索了多个数据库,以及Clinicaltrials.gov、欧盟临床试验和国际标准随机对照试验(RCT)注册库上的灰色文献。所有评估VLS任何治疗方法的RCT均符合纳入标准。21项RCT共评估了775例患者。评估工具报告了以下领域的结果:患者报告的症状,12项研究中使用一种经过验证的量表评估,9项研究中使用7种未经验证的量表评估;性功能,2项研究中使用经过验证的女性性功能指数和女性性困扰量表评估,2项研究中使用2种未经验证的量表评估;生活质量,3项研究中使用3种经过验证的量表评估,临床医生报告的客观结果,3项研究中使用2种经过验证的量表评估,14项研究中使用6种未经验证的量表评估。10项研究评估了组织学变化,1项研究评估了组织生物力学。我们还开展了一项由809名VLS女性完成的在线调查,以评估她们对研究和疾病治疗的优先事项,并确定用于评估这些事项的经过验证的结局指标。VLS治疗效果评估存在高度变异性。我们确定了可在VLS研究中实施的经过验证的评估工具,以评估治疗效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2841/11442075/7f24585b8952/SKI2-4-e422-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验