• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脆弱性、社会价值与研究利益的公平分享:超越安慰剂与获取问题的争论

Vulnerability, social value and the equitable sharing of benefits from research: beyond the placebo and access debates.

作者信息

Kurihara Chieko, Greco Dirceu, Dhai Ames, Matsuyama Kotone, Baroutsou Varvara

机构信息

Kanagawa Dental University, Yokosuka, Japan.

Ethics Working Group of International Federation of Associations of Pharmaceutical Physicians and Pharmaceutical Medicine (IFAPP), Woerden, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 17;11:1432267. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1432267. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2024.1432267
PMID:39355849
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11442373/
Abstract

The vulnerability of research participants is a critical topic for the 2024 revision of the Declaration of Helsinki, with the proposal to include "social value. " However, this proposal has been withdrawn and the relationship between the two concepts has not been clarified. This paper attempts to clarify: (1) the recent reform for the ethical inclusion of vulnerable study participants to promote diversity; (2) the social value, prerequisite for everyone, especially for those who are vulnerable and the most in need; (3) the requirements for promoting the inclusion of vulnerable participants, in particular the review of the norms for placebo-controlled trials and post-trial access; (4) finally, the direction of research ethics reform to achieve social value and equitable global health.

摘要

研究参与者的脆弱性是《赫尔辛基宣言》2024年修订版的一个关键议题,其中提议纳入“社会价值”。然而,该提议已被撤回,且这两个概念之间的关系尚未厘清。本文试图阐明:(1)近期为将脆弱研究参与者纳入伦理考量以促进多样性所做的改革;(2)社会价值,这是每个人的前提条件,尤其是对那些脆弱且最有需求的人而言;(3)促进纳入脆弱参与者的要求,特别是对安慰剂对照试验规范及试验后获取情况的审查;(4)最后,实现社会价值和全球健康公平的研究伦理改革方向。

相似文献

1
Vulnerability, social value and the equitable sharing of benefits from research: beyond the placebo and access debates.脆弱性、社会价值与研究利益的公平分享:超越安慰剂与获取问题的争论
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 17;11:1432267. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1432267. eCollection 2024.
2
Post-trial obligations in the Declaration of Helsinki 2013: classification, reconstruction and interpretation.《2013年赫尔辛基宣言》中的试验后义务:分类、重构与解读
Dev World Bioeth. 2016 Aug;16(2):80-90. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12099. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
3
Declaration of Helsinki: ethical norm in pursuit of common global goals.《赫尔辛基宣言》:追求全球共同目标中的伦理规范。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 2;11:1360653. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1360653. eCollection 2024.
4
The revision of the Declaration of Helsinki: past, present and future.《赫尔辛基宣言》的修订:过去、现在与未来
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Jun;57(6):695-713. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02103.x.
5
Ethical research issues: going beyond the Declaration of Helsinki.伦理研究问题:超越《赫尔辛基宣言》
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2001 Mar;26(1):39-59; discussion 67-71. doi: 10.1023/a:1009515621157.
6
The Declaration of Helsinki on Medical Research involving Human Subjects: A Review of Seventh Revision.《涉及人类受试者的医学研究赫尔辛基宣言》:第七版修订综述
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2020 Jan 21;17(4):548-552. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v17i4.1042.
7
[The Helsinki Declaration: relativism and vulnerability].《赫尔辛基宣言:相对主义与脆弱性》
Cad Saude Publica. 2001 May-Jun;17(3):679-88. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2001000300022.
8
The revised Declaration of Helsinki--is justice served?修订后的《赫尔辛基宣言》——正义得到伸张了吗?
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002 Feb;40(2):76-83. doi: 10.5414/cpp40076.
9
[Compare new therapies with old, not with a placebo: a plea for revision of the Declaration of Helsinki].[将新疗法与旧疗法进行比较,而非与安慰剂比较:呼吁修订《赫尔辛基宣言》]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2013;157(45):A6542.
10
The revised Declaration of Helsinki: cosmetic or real change?《赫尔辛基宣言》修订版:是表面变化还是实质性改变?
J R Soc Med. 2016 May;109(5):184-9. doi: 10.1177/0141076816643332.

引用本文的文献

1
Perspectives on adherence to prescribed home exercises after polytrauma: A qualitative study.多发伤后坚持规定家庭锻炼的观点:一项定性研究。
S Afr J Physiother. 2025 Jun 11;81(1):2163. doi: 10.4102/sajp.v81i1.2163. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Declaration of Helsinki: ethical norm in pursuit of common global goals.《赫尔辛基宣言》:追求全球共同目标中的伦理规范。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 2;11:1360653. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1360653. eCollection 2024.
2
Radiological protection in human research ethics using a case study: toward update of the ICRP Publication 62.人类研究伦理中的放射防护:采用案例研究的方式,推进 ICRP 出版物 62 的更新。
J Radiol Prot. 2023 Nov 10;43(4). doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/ad04f0.
3
Utilization of genetic information for medicines development and equitable benefit sharing.利用遗传信息进行药物研发及公平分享利益。
Front Genet. 2023 Jun 14;14:1085864. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1085864. eCollection 2023.
4
Race and Ethnicity Reporting and Representation in Pediatric Clinical Trials.儿科临床试验中的种族和族裔报告与呈现
Pediatrics. 2023 Apr 1;151(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-058552.
5
No person left behind: Mapping the health policy landscape for genomics research in the Caribbean.一个都不能少:绘制加勒比地区基因组学研究的卫生政策蓝图。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Sep 18;15:100367. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100367. eCollection 2022 Nov.
6
Challenges of globalization of cancer drug trials- recruitment in LMICs, approval in HICs.癌症药物试验全球化面临的挑战——在低收入和中等收入国家进行招募,在高收入国家获得批准。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2021 Dec 27;7:100157. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100157. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
Can Afro-Communitarianism Be Useful in Combating the Challenge of Human Interaction Posed by the COVID-19 Pandemic?非裔共产主义能否有助于应对新冠疫情带来的人际互动挑战?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 31;19(21):14255. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114255.
8
Data solidarity: a blueprint for governing health futures.数据团结:治理健康未来的蓝图。
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Nov;4(11):e773-e774. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00189-3.
9
The continuation of clinical trials in times of war: A need to develop ethics and situationally adaptive clinical research guidelines.战时临床试验的延续:制定伦理及因地制宜的临床研究指南的必要性。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 16;9:966220. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.966220. eCollection 2022.
10
The ethical responsibility to continue investigational treatments of research participants in situation of armed conflicts, economic sanctions or natural catastrophes.在武装冲突、经济制裁或自然灾害情况下,继续对研究参与者进行试验性治疗的伦理责任。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 9;9:950409. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.950409. eCollection 2022.