• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜下 Hartmann 手术治疗复杂性憩室炎与开放性手术相比,具有较低的浅表性手术部位感染风险,且其他结局相似:基于 NSQIP 的倾向评分匹配分析。

Laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure for complicated diverticulitis is associated with lower superficial surgical site infections compared to open surgery with similar other outcomes: a NSQIP-based, propensity score matched analysis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, NYU Langone Hospital-Long Island, 222 Station Plaza North, Suite 300, Mineola, NY, 11501, USA.

Biostatistics Core, Division of Health Services Research, Department of Foundations of Medicine, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY, 11501, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Oct;50(5):2097-2103. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02661-1. Epub 2024 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1007/s00068-024-02661-1
PMID:39356294
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Open Hartmann's procedure has traditionally been the procedure of choice to treat complicated diverticulitis. We analyzed the ACS-NSQIP database to compare outcomes in patients who underwent emergent laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure (LHP) to those who had an open Hartmann's procedure (OHP).

STUDY DESIGN

Data analyzed from 2015 to 2019 using ICD-10 codes. Patients were matched on several important covariates using a propensity score matching method (PSM). Patients were matched in a 4:1 ratio of controls to cases based on the propensity score.

RESULTS

We identified 5026, of which 456 had LHP and 4570 had OHP. PSM analysis yielded 369 LHP and 1476 OHP patients. LHP had lower rates of superficial surgical site infection (SSSI) compared to OHP (2.44% vs. 5.89%, p = 0.007). LHP had similar post-operative outcomes compared to OHP, including 30-day mortality (5.15% vs. 2.98%, p = 0.060), organ space surgical site infection (OSSSI) (14.36% vs. 12.60%, p = 0.161), wound disruption (1.36% vs. 2.44%, p = 0.349), median LOS (8 vs. 9 days, p = 0.252), readmission within 30 days (11.92% vs. 8.67%, p = 0.176), rate of reoperation (6.0 vs. 6.5%, p = 0.897), and discharge to home (76% vs. 77%, p = 0.992). LHP had longer operative times compared to OHP (median 129 vs. 118 min, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The LHP is associated with lower rates of SSSI. However, it is not associated with lower rates of mortality, OSSSI, readmissions and reoperations within 30 days. Surgical times are longer in LHP. More studies are needed to determine whether LHP offers advantages in the long-term, particularly in rates of incisional hernia and colostomy closure.

摘要

背景

开放性 Hartmann 手术一直是治疗复杂憩室炎的首选方法。我们分析了 ACS-NSQIP 数据库,比较了接受紧急腹腔镜 Hartmann 手术(LHP)和开放性 Hartmann 手术(OHP)的患者的结局。

研究设计

使用 ICD-10 代码分析 2015 年至 2019 年的数据。使用倾向评分匹配方法(PSM)对多个重要协变量进行患者匹配。基于倾向评分,将患者以 4:1 的比例匹配对照和病例。

结果

我们共确定了 5026 例患者,其中 456 例接受了 LHP,4570 例接受了 OHP。PSM 分析得到 369 例 LHP 和 1476 例 OHP 患者。与 OHP 相比,LHP 的浅表手术部位感染(SSSI)发生率较低(2.44%比 5.89%,p=0.007)。LHP 的术后结局与 OHP 相似,包括 30 天死亡率(5.15%比 2.98%,p=0.060)、器官间隙手术部位感染(OSSSI)(14.36%比 12.60%,p=0.161)、伤口破裂(1.36%比 2.44%,p=0.349)、中位 LOS(8 天比 9 天,p=0.252)、30 天内再入院(11.92%比 8.67%,p=0.176)、再次手术率(6.0%比 6.5%,p=0.897)和出院回家率(76%比 77%,p=0.992)。与 OHP 相比,LHP 的手术时间更长(中位数 129 分钟比 118 分钟,p<0.0001)。

结论

LHP 与较低的 SSSI 发生率相关。然而,它与 30 天内死亡率、OSSSI、再入院和再次手术的发生率无关。LHP 的手术时间较长。需要更多的研究来确定 LHP 是否在长期内具有优势,特别是在切口疝和结肠造口关闭的发生率方面。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure for complicated diverticulitis is associated with lower superficial surgical site infections compared to open surgery with similar other outcomes: a NSQIP-based, propensity score matched analysis.腹腔镜下 Hartmann 手术治疗复杂性憩室炎与开放性手术相比,具有较低的浅表性手术部位感染风险,且其他结局相似:基于 NSQIP 的倾向评分匹配分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Oct;50(5):2097-2103. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02661-1. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
2
Emergency Hartmann's Procedure and Its Reversal: A Totally Laparoscopic 2-Step Surgery for the Treatment of Hinchey III and IV Diverticulitis.急诊哈特曼手术及其逆转:一种用于治疗欣奇 III 级和 IV 级憩室炎的完全腹腔镜两步手术。
Surg Innov. 2017 Dec;24(6):557-565. doi: 10.1177/1553350617722226. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
3
Damage control strategy for the management of perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis: laparoscopic lavage and drainage vs. laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure.穿孔性憩室炎伴弥漫性腹膜炎的损伤控制性处理策略:腹腔镜灌洗引流与腹腔镜 Hartmann 手术的对比。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Oct;26(10):2835-42. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2255-y. Epub 2012 Apr 28.
4
Open versus laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.开腹与腹腔镜下 Hartmann 手术:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022 Dec;37(12):2421-2430. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04285-6. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
5
The impact of surgeon volume on colostomy reversal outcomes after Hartmann's procedure for diverticulitis.外科医生手术量对憩室炎行哈特曼手术结肠造口回纳结果的影响。
Surgery. 2016 Nov;160(5):1309-1317. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.05.008. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
6
Efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted approach for reversal of Hartmann's procedure: results from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database.腹腔镜辅助法用于哈特曼手术逆转的疗效:来自美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据库的结果
Surg Endosc. 2015 Aug;29(8):2109-14. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3926-7. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
7
Transanal Hartmann's colostomy reversal assisted by laparoscopy: outcomes of the first 10 patients.经腹腔镜辅助经肛 Hartmann 结肠造口还纳术:10 例患者的初步结果。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):4981-4987. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5462-8. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
8
Primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy vs. Hartmann's procedure for acute diverticulitis: what happens after discharge? Results of a nationwide analysis.一期吻合加预防性回肠造口术与 Hartmann 术式治疗急性憩室炎:出院后会发生什么?一项全国性分析的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2777-2787. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10752-8. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
9
Comparison between laparoscopic and open Hartmann's reversal: results of a decade-long multicenter retrospective study.腹腔镜与开腹 Hartmann 术式回肠造口还纳术的比较:一项长达十年的多中心回顾性研究结果。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Dec;32(12):4780-4787. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6227-8. Epub 2018 May 15.
10
Open vs Minimally Invasive Approach for Emergent Colectomy in Perforated Diverticulitis.穿孔性憩室炎急诊结肠切除的开放与微创途径比较。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Mar 1;64(3):319-327. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001805.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive emergency colorectal surgery in nonspecialist surgical centers: a necessity, not a luxury.非专科手术中心的微创急诊结直肠手术:是必要之举,而非奢侈之选。
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2025 Sep 15;28(3):113-114. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2025.28.3.113.
2
Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Negative-Suction Drain on Surgical Site Infection After Ileostomy Reversal: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.皮下负压引流对回肠造口还纳术后手术部位感染的有效性:一项倾向评分匹配分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 3;14(1):236. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010236.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic Versus Open Emergent Sigmoid Resection for Perforated Diverticulitis.腹腔镜与开腹急诊乙状结肠切除术治疗穿孔性憩室炎。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 May;24(5):1173-1182. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04490-9. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
2
Hartmann's procedure versus sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or faecal peritonitis (LADIES): a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised, open-label, superiority trial.Hartmann 手术与一期吻合术治疗伴有脓性或粪便性腹膜炎的穿孔性憩室炎(LADIES):一项多中心、平行组、随机、开放标签、优效性试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Aug;4(8):599-610. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30174-8. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
3
The end of the Hartmann's era for perforated diverticulitis.
哈特曼氏术治疗穿孔性憩室炎时代的终结。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Aug;4(8):573-575. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30182-7. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
4
Acute laparoscopic and open sigmoidectomy for perforated diverticulitis: a propensity score-matched cohort.急性腹腔镜与开放性乙状结肠切除术治疗穿孔性憩室炎:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3889-96. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4694-8. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
5
Evolving practice patterns in the management of acute colonic diverticulitis: a population-based analysis.急性结肠憩室炎管理中不断演变的实践模式:一项基于人群的分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Dec;57(12):1397-405. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000224.
6
"The National Surgery Quality Improvement Project" (NSQIP): a new tool to increase patient safety and cost efficiency in a surgical intensive care unit.“国家外科质量改进项目”(NSQIP):一种提高外科重症监护病房患者安全性和成本效益的新工具。
Patient Saf Surg. 2014 Apr 24;8:19. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-8-19. eCollection 2014.
7
Laparoscopic versus open Hartmann procedure for the emergency treatment of diverticulitis: a propensity-matched analysis.腹腔镜与开腹 Hartmann 手术治疗憩室炎急症:倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Jan;56(1):72-82. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182749cf5.
8
A population-based study of perforated diverticular disease incidence and associated mortality.一项基于人群的穿孔性憩室病发病率及相关死亡率研究。
Gastroenterology. 2009 Apr;136(4):1198-205. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.054. Epub 2008 Dec 27.
9
Heart failure, chronic diuretic use, and increase in mortality and hospitalization: an observational study using propensity score methods.心力衰竭、长期使用利尿剂与死亡率及住院率增加:一项使用倾向评分法的观察性研究
Eur Heart J. 2006 Jun;27(12):1431-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi890. Epub 2006 May 18.
10
The net immunologic advantage of laparoscopic surgery.腹腔镜手术的净免疫优势。
Surg Endosc. 2004 Oct;18(10):1411-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8275-x. Epub 2004 Aug 26.