Suppr超能文献

穿孔性憩室炎伴弥漫性腹膜炎的损伤控制性处理策略:腹腔镜灌洗引流与腹腔镜 Hartmann 手术的对比。

Damage control strategy for the management of perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis: laparoscopic lavage and drainage vs. laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure.

机构信息

The Texas Endosurgery Institute, 4242 E. Southcross Blvd., Suite 1, San Antonio, TX 78222, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2012 Oct;26(10):2835-42. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2255-y. Epub 2012 Apr 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to compare laparoscopic peritoneal lavage and drainage (LLD) with laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure (LHP) in the management of perforated diverticulitis and to investigate a safer and more effective laparoscopic method for managing acute perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis.

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients who underwent emergent LHP or LLD for perforated diverticulitis were identified from a prospectively designed database. All procedure-related information was collected and analyzed. P < 5 % was considered statistically significant in this study.

RESULTS

A total of 88 patients underwent emergent laparoscopic procedures (47 LLD and 41 LHP) between 1995 and 2010 for acute perforated diverticulitis. Diagnostic laparoscopy classified 74 (84.1 %) patients as Hinchey III or IV perforated diverticulitis. OT for LHP was 182 ± 54.7 min, and EBL was 210 ± 170.5 ml. Six LHP (14.6 %) were converted to open Hartmann's for various reasons. Moreover the rates of LHP-associated postoperative mortality and morbidity were 2.4 and 17.1 %, respectively. For LLD, the operating time was 99.7 ± 39.8 min, and blood loss was 34.4 ± 21.2 ml. Three patients (6.4 %) were reoperated for the worsening of septic symptoms during post-LLD course. Moreover, the patients with LHP had significantly longer hospital stay than the ones with LLD did (16.3 ± 10.1 vs. 6.7 ± 2.2 days, P < 0.01). In the long-term follow-up, the rate of colostomy closure for LHP is 72.2 %, and 21 of 47 patients who underwent LLD had elective sigmoidectomy for the source control with the rate of 44.7 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Both LHP and LLD can be performed safely and effectively for managing severe diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis. Compared with LHP, LLD does not remove the pathogenic source; however, the clinical application of this damage control operation to our patients showed significantly better short- and long-term clinical outcomes for managing perforated diverticulitis with various Hinchey classifications.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较腹腔镜腹腔灌洗引流(LLD)与腹腔镜 Hartmann 手术(LHP)治疗穿孔性憩室炎的效果,并探讨一种更安全有效的腹腔镜方法治疗伴有弥漫性腹膜炎的急性穿孔性憩室炎。

方法

从一个前瞻性设计的数据库中确定了 1995 年至 2010 年间因急性穿孔性憩室炎行紧急 LHP 或 LLD 的连续系列患者。收集并分析所有与手术相关的信息。本研究中 P<5%认为具有统计学意义。

结果

共 88 例患者因急性穿孔性憩室炎行紧急腹腔镜手术(47 例行 LLD,41 例行 LHP)。诊断性腹腔镜检查将 74 例(84.1%)患者分为 Hinchey III 或 IV 级穿孔性憩室炎。LHP 的手术时间为 182±54.7min,出血量为 210±170.5ml。6 例(14.6%)LHP 因各种原因转为开腹 Hartmann 手术。此外,LHP 相关的术后死亡率和发病率分别为 2.4%和 17.1%。对于 LLD,手术时间为 99.7±39.8min,出血量为 34.4±21.2ml。3 例(6.4%)患者在 LLD 术后因脓毒症症状加重而再次手术。此外,LHP 组的住院时间明显长于 LLD 组(16.3±10.1 与 6.7±2.2 天,P<0.01)。在长期随访中,LHP 行结肠造口还纳术的比例为 72.2%,47 例行 LLD 的患者中有 21 例行择期乙状结肠切除术以控制原发病灶,比例为 44.7%。

结论

LHP 和 LLD 均可安全有效地治疗伴有弥漫性腹膜炎的严重憩室炎。与 LHP 相比,LLD 不能去除病因,但将这种损伤控制手术应用于我们的患者,对于治疗各种 Hinchey 分级的穿孔性憩室炎,其短期和长期临床效果明显更好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验