Department of General Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Jan;56(1):72-82. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182749cf5.
A laparoscopic approach has been proposed to reduce the high morbidity and mortality associated with the Hartmann procedure for the emergency treatment of diverticulitis.
The objective of our study was to determine whether a laparoscopic Hartmann procedure reduces early morbidity or mortality for patients undergoing an emergency operation for diverticulitis.
This is a comparative effectiveness study. A subset of the entire American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program patient sample matched on propensity for undergoing their procedure with the laparoscopic approach were used to compare postoperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open groups.
This study uses data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant User Files from 2005 through 2009.
All patients who underwent an emergency laparoscopic or open partial colectomy with end colostomy for colonic diverticulitis were reviewed.
The main outcome measures were 30-day mortality and morbidity.
Included in the analysis were 1186 patients undergoing emergency partial colectomy with end colostomy for diverticulitis. Among the entire cohort, the laparoscopic group had fewer overall complications (26% vs 41.7%, p = 0.008) and shorter mean length of hospitalization (8.9 vs 11.6 days, p = 0.0008). Operative times were not significantly different between groups. When controlling for potential confounders, a laparoscopic approach was not associated with a decrease in morbidity or mortality. In comparison with a propensity-match cohort, the laparoscopic approach did not reduce postoperative morbidity or mortality.
This study is limited by its retrospective nature and the absence of pertinent variables such as postoperative pain indices, time for return of bowel function, and rates of readmission.
A laparoscopic approach to the Hartmann procedure for the emergency treatment of complicated diverticulitis does not significantly decrease postoperative morbidity or mortality in comparison with the open technique.
为了降低憩室炎紧急治疗中 Hartmann 手术相关的高发病率和死亡率,有人提出了腹腔镜方法。
我们的研究目的是确定腹腔镜 Hartmann 手术是否降低因憩室炎而行紧急手术患者的早期发病率或死亡率。
这是一项比较有效性研究。使用美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划患者样本的一个子集,该子集通过倾向于采用腹腔镜方法进行手术进行匹配,以比较腹腔镜组和开放组之间的术后结果。
本研究使用了 2005 年至 2009 年美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划参与者用户文件中的数据。
所有接受腹腔镜或开放性部分结肠切除术伴结肠造口术治疗结肠憩室炎的紧急手术的患者均接受了回顾性分析。
主要观察指标为 30 天死亡率和发病率。
共纳入 1186 例接受紧急部分结肠切除术伴结肠造口术治疗憩室炎的患者。在整个队列中,腹腔镜组的总并发症发生率较低(26%比 41.7%,p=0.008),平均住院时间较短(8.9 比 11.6 天,p=0.0008)。两组的手术时间无显著差异。在控制潜在混杂因素后,腹腔镜方法与发病率或死亡率降低无关。与倾向匹配队列相比,腹腔镜方法并未降低术后发病率或死亡率。
本研究受到其回顾性性质以及缺乏术后疼痛指数、恢复肠道功能时间和再入院率等相关变量的限制。
与开放技术相比,腹腔镜方法用于治疗复杂憩室炎的 Hartmann 紧急手术并未显著降低术后发病率或死亡率。