Suppr超能文献

“对我的专业身份的挑战”-在实施试验中,从过度管理到自我管理腰痛:一项定性研究。

'A challenge to my professional identity'- resisting the shift from over-management to self-management for back pain within an implementation trial: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel; Department of Physical Therapy, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Physiotherapy. 2024 Dec;125:101424. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2024.101424. Epub 2024 Aug 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Enhanced Transtheoretical Model Intervention (ETMI) is based on behavioral models and focuses on guiding Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) patients to self-manage symptoms and engage in recreational physical activity. While there is promising evidence that ETMI benefits patients, it is unclear how challenging it might be to implement widely. This investigation focused on the perceptions of physiotherapists trained to deliver ETMI for CLBP.

DESIGN

A Qualitative study comprised of semi-structured interviews (July to November 2023). Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed thematically by two independent researchers.

SETTING

Data were obtained as part of a large implementation study evaluating the uptake and impact of ETMI amongst physiotherapists in a large public healthcare setting.

PARTICIPANTS

22 physiotherapists trained to deliver the ETMI approach and chose to use it with at least one patient.

RESULTS

While physiotherapists acknowledged the evidence base behind ETMI and the clarity of the approach, they struggled to adapt it to routine delivery. Exploration of the reasons for this identified an overarching meta-theme, 'A challenge to my professional identity', and three main themes consisting of 1) interventions such as ETMI contradicted my training. 2) I am ambivalent/ do not accept evidence that contradicts my habitual practice, and 3) I am under-skilled in psychological and communication skills.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the reluctance of physiotherapists to implement evidence-based interventions such as ETMI, which fundamentally challenge their traditional practice and therapeutic identity. The shift from over-management by experts seeking cures to supporting self-management was not palatable to physiotherapists. The challenge of embracing a new professional identity must be addressed to enable a successful implementation of the approach. CONTRIBUTION OF THE PAPER.

摘要

目的

增强跨理论模型干预(ETMI)基于行为模型,专注于指导慢性下背痛(CLBP)患者自我管理症状并参与娱乐性身体活动。虽然有证据表明 ETMI 对患者有益,但尚不清楚广泛实施的难度有多大。这项研究关注的是接受过培训以治疗 CLBP 的物理治疗师对 ETMI 的看法。

设计

一项定性研究,包括半结构化访谈(2023 年 7 月至 11 月)。访谈进行了录音、转录、编码,并由两位独立的研究人员进行主题分析。

设置

数据是作为一项大型实施研究的一部分获得的,该研究评估了在大型公共医疗保健环境中,ETMI 在物理治疗师中的采用和影响。

参与者

22 名接受过 ETMI 方法培训并选择至少用一种方法治疗一名患者的物理治疗师。

结果

虽然物理治疗师承认 ETMI 的证据基础和方法的清晰度,但他们难以将其应用于常规治疗。对原因的探讨确定了一个总体的元主题,即“对我的专业身份的挑战”,以及三个主要主题,包括 1)干预措施,如 ETMI,与我的培训相矛盾。2)我对与我的习惯性实践相矛盾的证据持矛盾态度/不接受,3)我在心理和沟通技巧方面技能不足。

结论

本研究强调了物理治疗师不愿实施 ETMI 等基于证据的干预措施,因为这些措施从根本上挑战了他们的传统实践和治疗身份。从专家寻求治愈的过度管理转向支持自我管理的转变对物理治疗师来说并不受欢迎。必须解决接受新专业身份的挑战,以成功实施该方法。论文的贡献。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验