Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Aug;15(4):798-807. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1788979. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
Variability in cardiopulmonary arrest training and management leads to inconsistent outcomes during in-hospital cardiac arrest. Existing clinical decision aids, such as American Heart Association (AHA) advanced cardiovascular life support (ACLS) pocket cards and third-party mobile apps, often lack comprehensive management guidance. We developed a novel, guided ACLS mobile app and evaluated user performance during simulated cardiac arrest according to the 2020 AHA ACLS guidelines via randomized controlled trial.
Forty-six resident physicians were randomized to lead a simulated code team using the AHA pockets cards ( = 22) or the guided app ( = 24). The primary outcome was successful return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Secondary outcomes included code leader stress and confidence, AHA ACLS guideline adherence, and errors. A focus group of 22 residents provided feedback. Statistical analysis included two-sided -tests and Fisher's exact tests.
App users showed significantly higher ROSC rate (50 vs. 18%; = 0.024), correct thrombolytic administration (54 vs. 23%; = 0.029), backboard use (96 vs. 27%; < 0.001), end-tidal CO2 monitoring (58 vs. 27%; = 0.033), and confidence compared with baseline (1.0 vs 0.3; = 0.005) compared with controls. A focus group of 22 residents indicated unanimous willingness to use the app, with 82% preferring it over AHA pocket cards.
Our guided ACLS app shows potential to improve user confidence and adherence to the AHA ACLS guidelines and may help to standardize in-hospital cardiac arrest management. Further validation studies are essential to confirm its efficacy in clinical practice.
心肺复苏培训和管理的差异导致院内心搏骤停期间结果不一致。现有的临床决策辅助工具,如美国心脏协会(AHA)的高级心血管生命支持(ACLS)袖珍卡和第三方移动应用程序,通常缺乏全面的管理指导。我们开发了一种新颖的、有指导的 ACLS 移动应用程序,并通过随机对照试验根据 2020 年 AHA ACLS 指南评估了用户在模拟心搏骤停期间的表现。
46 名住院医师被随机分为使用 AHA 袖珍卡( = 22)或指导应用程序( = 24)领导模拟编码团队。主要结局是自发循环恢复(ROSC)的成功。次要结局包括编码负责人的压力和信心、AHA ACLS 指南的遵守情况以及错误。一个由 22 名住院医师组成的焦点小组提供了反馈。统计分析包括双侧检验和 Fisher 精确检验。
应用程序用户的 ROSC 率显著更高(50%比 18%; = 0.024),正确溶栓治疗的使用率(54%比 23%; = 0.029),背板使用率(96%比 27%; < 0.001),呼气末 CO2 监测率(58%比 27%; = 0.033),以及与对照组相比的信心(1.0 比 0.3; = 0.005)。一个由 22 名住院医师组成的焦点小组表示一致愿意使用该应用程序,82%的人更喜欢它而不是 AHA 袖珍卡。
我们的指导 ACLS 应用程序显示出提高用户信心和遵守 AHA ACLS 指南的潜力,并可能有助于规范院内心搏骤停管理。进一步的验证研究对于确认其在临床实践中的疗效至关重要。