Barat Maxime, Ollivier Camille, Taibi Linda, Nitsche Véronique, Sogni Philippe, Soyer Philippe, Parlati Lucia, Dohan Anthony, Abdoul Hendy, Revel Marie-Pierre
Université Paris Cité, Paris 75006, France; Department of Radiology, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris 75014, France; Génomique et Signalisation des Tumeurs Endocrines, Institute Cochin, INSERM U 1016, CNRS UMR8104, Paris 75014, France.
URP7323, Pharmacologie et Évaluations des Thérapeutiques chez l'Enfant et la Femme Enceinte, Université Paris Cité, Paris 75014, France; Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris 75014, France.
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2025 Mar;106(3):93-97. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2024.09.009. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
The purpose of this study was to compare levels of pain and anxiety during percutaneous ultrasound-guided liver biopsy between patients receiving standard of care and those receiving standard of care plus the support of Ericksonian hypnosis.
This prospective, single-center, single-blind, randomized controlled superiority trial included 70 participants. Participants were randomly assigned to either the standard of care group and received oral anxiolytic medications with reassuring conversational support, or to the experimental group, and received Ericksonian hypnosis (i.e., conversational hypnosis) in addition to standard of care. The primary outcome was the level of pain experienced during the biopsy, measured on a 10-point visual analog scale (0 indicating no pain to 10 indicating excruciating pain). Secondary outcomes included anxiety level during the biopsy, pain level within one hour of the biopsy measured using the same 10-point visual analog scale, amount of analgesic medication taken in the 24 h following the biopsy, and patient willingness to undergo another ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy in the future.
Thirty-six participants were included in the standard of care group, and 34 were included in the experimental group. The mean score of pain experienced during the biopsy was lower in the experimental group (2.4 ± 1.9 [standard deviation (SD)]) compared to the standard of care group (4.4 ± 2.6 [SD]) (P = 0.001). The level of anxiety experienced during the biopsy was lower in the hypnosis group (2.1 ± 1.8 [SD]) compared to the standard of care group (4.8 ± 2.4 [SD]) (P < 0.001). No significant differences in other secondary outcomes were observed between the two groups.
The addition of Ericksonian hypnosis to standard of care reduces the pain experienced by patients during percutaneous ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy by comparison with standard of care alone.
本研究旨在比较接受标准护理的患者与接受标准护理加埃里克森催眠支持的患者在经皮超声引导下肝活检期间的疼痛和焦虑水平。
这项前瞻性、单中心、单盲、随机对照优势试验纳入了70名参与者。参与者被随机分配到标准护理组,接受口服抗焦虑药物并伴有安慰性的谈话支持,或者分配到实验组,除标准护理外还接受埃里克森催眠(即谈话催眠)。主要结局是活检期间经历的疼痛程度,采用10分视觉模拟量表进行测量(0表示无疼痛,10表示剧痛)。次要结局包括活检期间的焦虑水平、活检后一小时内使用相同10分视觉模拟量表测量的疼痛水平、活检后24小时内服用的止痛药物量,以及患者未来接受另一次超声引导经皮肝活检的意愿。
标准护理组纳入36名参与者,实验组纳入34名参与者。与标准护理组(4.4±2.6[标准差(SD)])相比,实验组活检期间经历的疼痛平均评分更低(2.4±1.9[SD])(P = 0.001)。与标准护理组(4.8±2.4[SD])相比,催眠组活检期间经历的焦虑水平更低(2.1±1.8[SD])(P < 0.001)。两组在其他次要结局方面未观察到显著差异。
与单独的标准护理相比,在标准护理中加入埃里克森催眠可减轻患者在经皮超声引导下经皮肝活检期间经历的疼痛。