Ashokka Balakrishnan, Law Lawrence Siu-Chun, Areti Archana, Burckett-St Laurent David, Zuercher Roman Oliver, Chin Ki-Jinn, Ramlogan Reva
Department of Anaesthesia, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Br J Anaesth. 2025 Feb;134(2):523-534. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.07.037. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
Structured training in regional anaesthesia includes pretraining on simulation-based educational platforms to establish a safe and controlled learning environment before learners are provided clinical exposure in an apprenticeship model. This scoping review was designed to appraise the educational outcomes of current simulation-based educational modalities in regional anaesthesia.
This review conformed to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Relevant articles were searched in PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and EMBASE with no date restrictions, until November 2023. Studies included randomised controlled trials, pre-post intervention, time series, case control, case series, and longitudinal studies, with no restrictions to settings, language or ethnic groups. The Kirkpatrick framework was applied for extraction of educational outcomes.
We included 28 studies, ranging from 2009 to 2023, of which 46.4% were randomised controlled trials. The majority of the target population was identified as trainees or residents (46.4%). Higher order educational outcomes that appraised translation to real clinical contexts (Kirkpatrick 3 and above) were reported in 12 studies (42.9%). Two studies demonstrated translational patient outcomes (Level 4) with reduced incidence of paraesthesia and clinical complications. The majority of studies appraised Level 3 outcomes of performance improvements in either laboratory simulation contexts (42.9%) or demonstration of clinical performance improvements in regional anaesthesia (39.3%).
There was significant heterogeneity in the types of simulation modalities used, teaching interventions applied, study methodologies, assessment tools, and outcome measures studied. When improvisations were made to regional anaesthesia simulation platforms (hybrid simulation), there were sustained educational improvements beyond 6 months. Newer technology-enhanced innovations such as virtual, augmented, and mixed reality simulations are evolving, with early reports of educational effectiveness.
区域麻醉的结构化培训包括在基于模拟的教育平台上进行预培训,以便在学习者以学徒模式进行临床实践之前建立一个安全且可控的学习环境。本范围综述旨在评估当前区域麻醉中基于模拟的教育模式的教育效果。
本综述符合PRISMA-ScR指南。在PubMed、Scopus、谷歌学术、科学网和EMBASE中检索相关文章,无日期限制,截至2023年11月。研究包括随机对照试验、干预前后研究、时间序列研究、病例对照研究、病例系列研究和纵向研究,对研究背景、语言或种族群体无限制。采用柯克帕特里克框架提取教育效果。
我们纳入了2009年至2023年的28项研究,其中46.4%为随机对照试验。大多数目标人群为实习生或住院医师(46.4%)。12项研究(42.9%)报告了评估向真实临床情境转化的高阶教育效果(柯克帕特里克3级及以上)。两项研究证明了转化后的患者结局(4级),感觉异常和临床并发症的发生率降低。大多数研究评估了实验室模拟情境下(42.9%)或区域麻醉临床操作改善方面(39.3%)的3级操作改善效果。
在使用的模拟模式类型、应用的教学干预、研究方法、评估工具和研究的结局指标方面存在显著异质性。当对区域麻醉模拟平台进行改进(混合模拟)时,6个月后仍有持续的教育改善。虚拟、增强和混合现实模拟等更新的技术增强创新正在不断发展,已有早期关于教育有效性的报道。