Suppr超能文献

羔羊饲粮中添加益生菌对其生产性能、瘤胃和粪便微生物区系的影响。

Performance, ruminal and fecal microbiome of lambs fed diets supplemented with probiotics.

机构信息

Graduate Program in Animal Science, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUCPR), Rua Imaculada Conceição, 1155- Bairro Prado Velho, Curitiba, Paraná, 80215-901, Brazil.

出版信息

Trop Anim Health Prod. 2024 Oct 2;56(8):319. doi: 10.1007/s11250-024-04161-1.

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the impact of adding two doses of a commercial probiotic on productive performance, ruminal and fecal microbiome in growing lambs. Forty-two Texel or Ile de France crossbred lambs aged 86.9 ± 8.0 days (body weight: 27.4 ± 3.7 kg) were distributed into three groups: basal diet without probiotic supplementation (CG); basal diet + 1 g/animal/day of probiotic (GP1) and basal diet + 5 g/animal/day of probiotic (GP5). The experimental period was 84 days. The weight was evaluated weekly and dry matter intake (DMI) and leftovers were measured daily. At the end of the experiment, lambs were slaughtered. Feces and rumen fluid were collected for microbiome analysis and rumen fragments for histological evaluation. The use of probiotics did not affect weight gain, but GP1 showed a higher silage and DMI intake than CG (p < 0.001). The CG had a greater thickness of keratinized epithelium and stratum corneum (< 0.001) than GP1 and GP5, and greater total papilla width (p = 0.039) than GP1. There was no difference in the general abundance in the rumen and fecal microbiomes. GP5 had a higher proportion of Azoarcus and Dialister taxa in the rumen fluid (p = 0.012 and p = 0.017, respectively) and higher proportion of Treponema and Fibrobacter taxa in the fecal microbiome (p = 0.015 and p = 0.026, respectively), whereas CG had a higher proportion of Anaeroplasma than the other groups (p = 0.032). These results demonstrated the benefits of probiotics for ruminal epithelium protection and microbial diversity. However, there was no effect on performance parameters.

摘要

本研究旨在探究在生长绵羊中添加两剂商业益生菌对生产性能、瘤胃和粪便微生物组的影响。42 只 Texel 或 Ile de France 杂交羔羊,年龄 86.9±8.0 天(体重:27.4±3.7 公斤),分为三组:基础日粮,不添加益生菌(CG);基础日粮+1g/动物/天益生菌(GP1)和基础日粮+5g/动物/天益生菌(GP5)。实验期为 84 天。每周评估体重,每天测量干物质摄入量(DMI)和剩料。实验结束时,屠宰羔羊。收集粪便和瘤胃液进行微生物组分析,收集瘤胃组织进行组织学评估。益生菌的使用并未影响增重,但 GP1 组青贮料和 DMI 摄入量高于 CG 组(p<0.001)。CG 组的角蛋白上皮和角质层厚度大于 GP1 和 GP5 组(p<0.001),总乳头宽度大于 GP1 组(p=0.039)。瘤胃和粪便微生物组的总体丰度无差异。GP5 组瘤胃液中 Azoarcus 和 Dialister 分类群的比例较高(p=0.012 和 p=0.017),粪便微生物组中 Treponema 和 Fibrobacter 分类群的比例较高(p=0.015 和 p=0.026),而 CG 组的 Anaeroplasma 比例高于其他两组(p=0.032)。这些结果表明益生菌对瘤胃上皮保护和微生物多样性有益。然而,对性能参数没有影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验