• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调强放疗时代儿童与成人鼻咽癌生存者长期生活质量的比较及其预测因素分析。

Comparison of long-term quality of life and their predictors in survivors between paediatric and adult nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era.

机构信息

Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, P. R. China.

Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, 510060, P. R. China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2024 Oct 2;24(1):1223. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12966-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-024-12966-4
PMID:39358733
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11447939/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare the differences in long-term quality of life (QoL) between survivors of paediatric and adult patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and assess the clinical factors that predict long-term QoL.

METHODS

We enrolled 420 long-term NPC survivors who were alive for at least 8 years after treatment, including 195 paediatric and 225 adult patients diagnosed and treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre (SYSUCC) between 2011 and 2015. Data on clinical factors and EORTC QLQ-C30 were collected from all participants. The QoL of paediatric and adult NPC survivors was compared.

RESULTS

The paediatric group had significantly better outcomes in global health status (paediatric: 80.2 ± 12.7; adult: 77.2 ± 11.5; P = 0.027), physical function (paediatric: 98.5 ± 4.6; adult: 95.1 ± 7.0; P < 0.001), role function (paediatric: 97.0 ± 9.2; adult: 90.5 ± 15.2; P < 0.001), social function (paediatric: 96.0 ± 8.9; adult: 93.5 ± 11.8; P = 0.038), insomnia (paediatric: 1.9 ± 7.8; adult: 13.1 ± 22.3; P < 0.001), constipation (paediatric: 1.3 ± 7.5; adult: 8.0 ± 17.4; P < 0.001), diarrhea (paediatric: 0.7 ± 4.6; adult: 2.8 ± 9.3; P = 0.010), and financial difficulties (paediatric: 1.9 ± 7.8; adult: 11.0 ± 19.8; P < 0.001), but poorer cognitive function (paediatric: 88.3 ± 9.9; adult: 93.8 ± 12.6; P < 0.001) than the adult group. Pretreatment clinical factors, including T stage, N stage, and pre-treatment EBV (Epstein-Barr Virus) DNA, showed a strong association with QoL. However, the factors that affected the QoL outcomes differed between the two groups. In survivors of paediatric cancer, global health status/QoL was strongly correlated with T stage (P < 0.001) and clinical stage (P = 0.018), whereas it was strongly correlated with pre-treatment EBV DNA (P = 0.008) in adults.

CONCLUSION

Paediatric survivors of NPC have a significantly better QoL than adult NPC survivors. Moreover, pre-treatment T stage, N stage, and EBV DNA significantly influenced the overall health status of the survivors. These results highlight the need to tailor care to both age groups to promote better long-term health outcomes.

摘要

背景

比较儿童和成人鼻咽癌(NPC)幸存者的长期生活质量(QoL)差异,并评估预测长期 QoL 的临床因素。

方法

我们纳入了 420 名长期 NPC 幸存者,他们在中山大学肿瘤防治中心(SYSUCC)接受调强放疗(IMRT)治疗后至少存活 8 年,包括 195 名儿科和 225 名成人患者,这些患者分别于 2011 年至 2015 年被诊断和治疗。所有参与者均收集了临床因素和 EORTC QLQ-C30 的数据。比较了儿科和成人 NPC 幸存者的 QoL。

结果

儿科组在总体健康状况(儿科:80.2±12.7;成人:77.2±11.5;P=0.027)、身体功能(儿科:98.5±4.6;成人:95.1±7.0;P<0.001)、角色功能(儿科:97.0±9.2;成人:90.5±15.2;P<0.001)、社会功能(儿科:96.0±8.9;成人:93.5±11.8;P=0.038)、失眠(儿科:1.9±7.8;成人:13.1±22.3;P<0.001)、便秘(儿科:1.3±7.5;成人:8.0±17.4;P<0.001)、腹泻(儿科:0.7±4.6;成人:2.8±9.3;P=0.010)和经济困难(儿科:1.9±7.8;成人:11.0±19.8;P<0.001)方面的结局明显优于成人组,但认知功能(儿科:88.3±9.9;成人:93.8±12.6;P<0.001)较差。治疗前的临床因素,包括 T 分期、N 分期和治疗前 EBV(Epstein-Barr Virus)DNA,与 QoL 有很强的关联。然而,两组的 QoL 结局影响因素不同。在儿科癌症幸存者中,总体健康状况/QoL 与 T 分期(P<0.001)和临床分期(P=0.018)强烈相关,而在成人中则与治疗前 EBV DNA (P=0.008)强烈相关。

结论

与成人 NPC 幸存者相比,儿童 NPC 幸存者的 QoL 明显更好。此外,治疗前 T 分期、N 分期和 EBV DNA 显著影响幸存者的整体健康状况。这些结果强调需要针对不同年龄组制定护理计划,以促进更好的长期健康结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6972/11447939/1930aa03dfbe/12885_2024_12966_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6972/11447939/b5de5310ec10/12885_2024_12966_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6972/11447939/1930aa03dfbe/12885_2024_12966_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6972/11447939/b5de5310ec10/12885_2024_12966_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6972/11447939/1930aa03dfbe/12885_2024_12966_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of long-term quality of life and their predictors in survivors between paediatric and adult nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era.调强放疗时代儿童与成人鼻咽癌生存者长期生活质量的比较及其预测因素分析。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Oct 2;24(1):1223. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12966-4.
2
Long-term late toxicities and quality of life for survivors of nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus non-intensity-modulated radiotherapy.调强放疗与非调强放疗治疗鼻咽癌幸存者的长期晚期毒性反应及生活质量
Head Neck. 2016 Apr;38 Suppl 1:E1026-32. doi: 10.1002/hed.24150. Epub 2015 Jul 18.
3
Long-Term Late Toxicity, Quality of Life, and Emotional Distress in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated With Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy.调强放疗治疗鼻咽癌患者的长期迟发性毒性、生活质量和情绪困扰。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Oct 1;102(2):340-352. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.060. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
4
Effect of Radiotherapy Alone vs Radiotherapy With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy on Survival Without Disease Relapse in Patients With Low-risk Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.单纯放疗与同期放化疗对低危鼻咽癌患者无疾病复发生存的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 Aug 23;328(8):728-736. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.13997.
5
Minimally invasive surgery alone compared with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for primary stage I nasopharyngeal carcinoma.单纯微创手术与调强放疗治疗Ⅰ期鼻咽癌的比较。
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2019 Nov 15;39(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s40880-019-0415-3.
6
Quality of life and survival outcome for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by volumetric-modulated arc therapy versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy.容积旋转调强放疗对比调强放疗治疗鼻咽癌患者的生活质量和生存结果。
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Apr 19;15(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01532-4.
7
Pretreatment quality of life as a predictor of survival for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with IMRT.调强放疗治疗鼻咽癌患者的生存预测因素:治疗前的生活质量。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jan 31;18(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4003-8.
8
Risk Assessment of Secondary Primary Malignancies in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Big-Data Intelligence Platform-Based Analysis of 6,377 Long-term Survivors from an Endemic Area Treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy during 2003-2013.基于大数据智能平台的分析:2003-2013 年期间接受调强放疗的 6377 例鼻咽癌长期生存者的二次原发恶性肿瘤风险评估
Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jul;51(3):982-991. doi: 10.4143/crt.2018.298. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
9
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy provides better quality of life than two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy for patients with stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma.对于II期鼻咽癌患者,调强放疗比二维传统放疗能提供更好的生活质量。
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 11;8(28):46211-46218. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17582.
10
Intensity-modulated or conformal radiotherapy improves the quality of life of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: comparisons of four radiotherapy techniques.调强放疗或适形放疗可改善鼻咽癌患者的生活质量:四种放疗技术的比较
Cancer. 2007 Jan 15;109(2):313-21. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22396.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic nomograms for nasopharyngeal carcinoma with nodal features and potential indication for N staging system: Validation and comparison of seven N stage schemes.具有淋巴结特征的鼻咽癌预后列线图及 N 分期系统的潜在适应证:七种 N 分期方案的验证和比较。
Oral Oncol. 2023 Sep;144:106438. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106438. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
2
Quality of life after pediatric cancer: comparison of long-term childhood cancer survivors' quality of life with a representative general population sample and associations with physical health and risk indicators.儿童癌症后的生活质量:长期儿童癌症幸存者的生活质量与代表性一般人群样本的比较,以及与身体健康和风险指标的关联。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Jul 4;21(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02153-7.
3
Multi-trajectories of health-related quality of life and their associated factors in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A longitudinal study.鼻咽癌患者健康相关生活质量的多轨迹及其相关因素:一项纵向研究。
Radiother Oncol. 2023 Sep;186:109743. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109743. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
4
Development and Validation of Models to Predict Poor Health-Related Quality of Life Among Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer.发展和验证模型,以预测儿童癌症成年幸存者的健康相关生活质量较差。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2227225. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.27225.
5
Association of Treatment Advances With Survival Rates in Pediatric Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in China, 1989-2020.中国儿童鼻咽癌患者的治疗进展与生存率的关联,1989-2020 年。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e220173. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0173.
6
Implications of inappropriate prescription of oral nutritional supplements on the quality of life of cancer outpatients: a cross-sectional comparative study.不适当开具口服营养补充剂对癌症门诊患者生活质量的影响:一项横断面比较研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 May;30(5):4149-4155. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-06837-6. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
7
Quality of life, coping strategies, and supportive care needs in head and neck cancer survivors: a qualitative study.头颈癌幸存者的生活质量、应对策略及支持性护理需求:一项定性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Aug;29(8):4349-4356. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05981-1. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
8
Clinical utility of Epstein-Barr virus DNA and other liquid biopsy markers in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.鼻咽癌中 EB 病毒 DNA 及其他液体活检标志物的临床实用性。
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2020 Nov;40(11):564-585. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12100. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
9
Clinicopathological and prognostic features of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in children and adolescents: A retrospective study of 196 cases in South China.儿童和青少年鼻咽癌的临床病理和预后特征:华南地区 196 例回顾性研究。
Int J Cancer. 2021 Mar 1;148(5):1087-1096. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33293. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
10
Quality of Life, Toxicity and Unmet Needs in Nasopharyngeal Cancer Survivors.鼻咽癌幸存者的生活质量、毒性反应及未满足的需求
Front Oncol. 2020 Jun 12;10:930. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00930. eCollection 2020.