Matthay Ellicott C, Charris Rafael, Ahern Jennifer, Apollonio Dorie E, Jent Victoria, Jacobs Laurie M, Jung Shelley, Schmidt Laura A, Gruenewald Paul
Center for Opioid Epidemiology and Policy, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Oct 2. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae384.
Recreational cannabis outlets may influence rates of interpersonal violence, but research has yielded inconsistent findings. Modification by alcohol outlet density may help explain inconsistencies. We estimated the impacts of recreational cannabis outlets on neighborhood-level assault injury rates in California and evaluated whether alcohol outlet density moderated these associations. We applied Bayesian spatiotemporal analyses to ZIP code-level statewide data on alcohol outlets, recreational cannabis outlets, and injuries and deaths due to firearm and nonfirearm assault, 2017-2019, accounting for confounders and spatial autocorrelation. Using the model posteriors, we estimated parameters corresponding to hypothetical shifts in outlet densities, overall and by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. If recreational cannabis outlets were never introduced, we estimated that nonfirearm assault injuries would have been 1.63 per 100,000 lower (95%CI: -3.08, 0.01) but we observed no association with firearm assault injuries (RD per 100,000: -0.07; 95%CI: -0.34, 0.21). These associations did not depend on alcohol outlet density, but a hypothetical 20% reduction in alcohol outlet densities was associated with fewer firearm (RD per 100,000: -1.89; 95%CI: -0.46, 0.09) and nonfirearm (RD per 100,000: -5.67; 95%CI: -7.44, -3.95) assault injuries. The introduction of recreational cannabis outlets may have contributed to a small increase in nonfirearm assault injuries.
休闲大麻销售点可能会影响人际暴力发生率,但研究结果并不一致。酒精销售点密度的改变可能有助于解释这些不一致之处。我们估计了休闲大麻销售点对加利福尼亚州邻里层面袭击伤害率的影响,并评估了酒精销售点密度是否会缓和这些关联。我们对2017 - 2019年全州邮政编码层面有关酒精销售点、休闲大麻销售点以及枪支和非枪支袭击导致的伤亡数据进行了贝叶斯时空分析,同时考虑了混杂因素和空间自相关性。利用模型后验概率,我们估计了与销售点密度假设性变化相对应的参数,包括总体以及按年龄、性别和种族/族裔划分的参数。如果从未引入休闲大麻销售点,我们估计非枪支袭击伤害率每10万人会降低1.63起(95%可信区间:-3.08, 0.01),但我们未观察到与枪支袭击伤害之间存在关联(每10万人相对危险度:-0.07;95%可信区间:-0.34, 0.21)。这些关联并不取决于酒精销售点密度,但假设酒精销售点密度降低20%,则与枪支(每10万人相对危险度:-1.89;95%可信区间:-0.46, 0.09)和非枪支(每10万人相对危险度:-5.67;95%可信区间:-7.44, -3.95)袭击伤害的减少有关。休闲大麻销售点的引入可能导致非枪支袭击伤害略有增加。