• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 ChatGPT 预测药物相互作用的能力:基于住院患者数据的真实世界证据。

Evaluating the capability of ChatGPT in predicting drug-drug interactions: Real-world evidence using hospitalized patient data.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Dec;90(12):3361-3366. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16275. Epub 2024 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1111/bcp.16275
PMID:39359001
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11602951/
Abstract

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) present a significant health burden, compounded by clinician time constraints and poor patient health literacy. We assessed the ability of ChatGPT (generative artificial intelligence-based large language model) to predict DDIs in a real-world setting. Demographics, diagnoses and prescribed medicines for 120 hospitalized patients were input through three standardized prompts to ChatGPT version 3.5 and compared against pharmacist DDI evaluation to estimate diagnostic accuracy. Area under receiver operating characteristic and inter-rater reliability (Cohen's and Fleiss' kappa coefficients) were calculated. ChatGPT's responses differed based on prompt wording style, with higher sensitivity for prompts mentioning 'drug interaction'. Confusion matrices displayed low true positive and high true negative rates, and there was minimal agreement between ChatGPT and pharmacists (Cohen's kappa values 0.077-0.143). Low sensitivity values suggest a lack of success in identifying DDIs by ChatGPT, and further development is required before it can reliably assess potential DDIs in real-world scenarios.

摘要

药物-药物相互作用(DDI)对健康造成了重大负担,加上临床医生时间有限和患者健康素养较差,情况更加复杂。我们评估了 ChatGPT(基于生成式人工智能的大型语言模型)在真实环境中预测 DDI 的能力。通过三个标准化提示,将 120 名住院患者的人口统计学数据、诊断和处方药物输入到 ChatGPT 版本 3.5 中,并与药剂师的 DDI 评估进行比较,以估计诊断准确性。计算了受试者工作特征曲线下的面积和组内相关系数(Cohen's 和 Fleiss' kappa 系数)。ChatGPT 的反应因提示措辞风格而异,提及“药物相互作用”的提示具有更高的敏感性。混淆矩阵显示出低真阳性和高真阴性率,并且 ChatGPT 和药剂师之间的一致性很小(Cohen's kappa 值为 0.077-0.143)。低灵敏度值表明 ChatGPT 在识别 DDI 方面的成功率较低,在能够可靠地评估真实场景中的潜在 DDI 之前,还需要进一步开发。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1527/11602951/53d52f119955/BCP-90-3361-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1527/11602951/3f541c38ad91/BCP-90-3361-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1527/11602951/53d52f119955/BCP-90-3361-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1527/11602951/3f541c38ad91/BCP-90-3361-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1527/11602951/53d52f119955/BCP-90-3361-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the capability of ChatGPT in predicting drug-drug interactions: Real-world evidence using hospitalized patient data.评估 ChatGPT 预测药物相互作用的能力:基于住院患者数据的真实世界证据。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Dec;90(12):3361-3366. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16275. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
2
Artificial intelligence (ChatGPT 4.0) vs. Human expertise for epileptic seizure and epilepsy diagnosis and classification in Adults: An exploratory study.成人癫痫发作及癫痫诊断与分类中的人工智能(ChatGPT 4.0)与人类专业知识:一项探索性研究
Epilepsy Behav. 2025 May;166:110364. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110364. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
3
Optimizing ChatGPT's Interpretation and Reporting of Delirium Assessment Outcomes: Exploratory Study.优化 ChatGPT 对谵妄评估结果的解释和报告:探索性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Oct 1;8:e51383. doi: 10.2196/51383.
4
Artificial intelligence with ChatGPT 4: a large language model in support of ocular oncology cases.配备ChatGPT 4的人工智能:一种支持眼部肿瘤病例的大语言模型。
Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb 7;45(1):59. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03399-w.
5
Application of Large Language Models in Medical Training Evaluation-Using ChatGPT as a Standardized Patient: Multimetric Assessment.大语言模型在医学培训评估中的应用——以ChatGPT作为标准化病人:多指标评估
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 1;27:e59435. doi: 10.2196/59435.
6
What's in a Name? Experimental Evidence of Gender Bias in Recommendation Letters Generated by ChatGPT.名字里的乾坤:ChatGPT 生成的推荐信中的性别偏见的实验证据。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 5;26:e51837. doi: 10.2196/51837.
7
Evaluating insomnia queries from an artificial intelligence chatbot for patient education.评估人工智能聊天机器人中关于失眠的查询,以进行患者教育。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2024 Apr 1;20(4):583-594. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.10948.
8
Evaluating the Influence of Role-Playing Prompts on ChatGPT's Misinformation Detection Accuracy: Quantitative Study.评估角色扮演提示对 ChatGPT 错误信息检测准确率的影响:定量研究。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2024 Sep 26;4:e60678. doi: 10.2196/60678.
9
Evaluating LLM-based generative AI tools in emergency triage: A comparative study of ChatGPT Plus, Copilot Pro, and triage nurses.评估基于大语言模型的生成式人工智能工具在急诊分诊中的应用:ChatGPT Plus、Copilot Pro与分诊护士的对比研究
Am J Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;89:174-181. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.12.024. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
10
FROM TEXT TO DIAGNOSE: CHATGPT'S EFFICACY IN MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING.从文本到诊断:ChatGPT 在医学决策中的功效。
Wiad Lek. 2023;76(11):2345-2350. doi: 10.36740/WLek202311101.

引用本文的文献

1
Can large language models detect drug-drug interactions leading to adverse drug reactions?大语言模型能否检测出导致药物不良反应的药物相互作用?
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2025 May 16;16:20420986251339358. doi: 10.1177/20420986251339358. eCollection 2025.
2
circ2LO: Identification of CircRNA Based on the LucaOne Large Model.circ2LO:基于LucaOne大型模型的环状RNA鉴定
Genes (Basel). 2025 Mar 31;16(4):413. doi: 10.3390/genes16040413.
3
Exploring potential drug-drug interactions in discharge prescriptions: ChatGPT's effectiveness in assessing those interactions.
探索出院处方中的潜在药物相互作用:ChatGPT评估这些相互作用的有效性。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2025 Jan 15;17:100564. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100564. eCollection 2025 Mar.