Hounsome Natalia, Yirgu Robel, Middleton Jo, Cassell Jackie A, Fekadu Abebaw, Davey Gail
Brighton and Sussex Centre for Global Health Research, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Center for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa (CDT-Africa), Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Front Health Serv. 2024 Sep 18;4:1279762. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1279762. eCollection 2024.
The strategies to control scabies in highly endemic populations include individual case/household management and mass drug administration (MDA). We used a decision-analytic model to compare ivermectin-based MDA and individual case/household management (referred to as "usual care") for control of scabies in Ethiopia at different prevalence thresholds for commencing MDA.
A decision-analytic model was based on a repeated population survey conducted in Northern Ethiopia in 2018-2020, which aimed to evaluate the secondary impact of single-dose ivermectin MDA for the control of onchocerciasis on scabies prevalence. The model estimates the number of scabies cases and costs of two treatment strategies (MDA and usual care) based on their effectiveness, population size, scabies prevalence, compliance with MDA, medication cost, and other parameters.
In the base-case analysis with a population of 100,000 and scabies prevalence of 15%, the MDA strategy was both more effective and less costly than usual care. The probability of MDA being cost-effective at the current cost-effectiveness threshold (equivalent to the cost of usual care) was 85%. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that the MDA strategy remained dominant (less costly and more effective) in 22 out of 26 scenarios. MDA was not cost-effective at scabies prevalence <10%, MDA effectiveness <85% and population size <5,000. An increase in the cost of ivermectin from 0 (donated) to 0.54 US$/dose resulted in a decrease in the probability of MDA being cost-effective from 85% to 17%. At 0.25 US$/dose, the MDA strategy was no longer cost-effective.
The model provides robust estimates of the costs and outcomes of MDA and usual care and can be used by decision-makers for planning and implementing scabies control programmes. Results of our analysis suggest that single-dose ivermectin MDA is cost-effective in scabies control and can be initiated at a scabies prevalence >10%.
在疥疮高流行人群中控制疥疮的策略包括个案/家庭管理和大规模药物给药(MDA)。我们使用决策分析模型,比较基于伊维菌素的MDA和个案/家庭管理(称为“常规护理”)在埃塞俄比亚不同MDA启动流行阈值下控制疥疮的效果。
决策分析模型基于2018 - 2020年在埃塞俄比亚北部进行的重复人群调查,该调查旨在评估单剂量伊维菌素MDA控制盘尾丝虫病对疥疮流行率的二次影响。该模型根据两种治疗策略(MDA和常规护理)的有效性、人口规模、疥疮流行率、MDA依从性、药物成本和其他参数,估算疥疮病例数和成本。
在基础案例分析中,人口为10万,疥疮流行率为15%,MDA策略比常规护理更有效且成本更低。在当前成本效益阈值(等同于常规护理成本)下,MDA具有成本效益的概率为85%。单向敏感性分析表明,在26种情况中的22种情况下,MDA策略仍然占主导地位(成本更低且更有效)。当疥疮流行率<10%、MDA有效性<85%和人口规模<5000时,MDA不具有成本效益。伊维菌素成本从0(捐赠)增加到0.54美元/剂量,导致MDA具有成本效益的概率从85%降至17%。在0.25美元/剂量时,MDA策略不再具有成本效益。
该模型对MDA和常规护理的成本及结果提供了可靠的估计,可供决策者用于规划和实施疥疮控制项目。我们的分析结果表明,单剂量伊维菌素MDA在疥疮控制中具有成本效益,可在疥疮流行率>10%时启动。