• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来自维基百科编辑数据的社会群体规模的因果证据。

Causal evidence for social group sizes from Wikipedia editing data.

作者信息

Burgess M, Dunbar R I M

机构信息

ChiTek-i AS, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Quarter, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Oct 2;11(10):240514. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240514. eCollection 2024 Oct.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.240514
PMID:39359459
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11444758/
Abstract

Human communities have self-organizing properties in which specific Dunbar Numbers may be invoked to explain group attachments. By analysing Wikipedia editing histories across a wide range of subject pages, we show that there is an emergent coherence in the size of transient groups formed to edit the content of subject texts, with two peaks averaging at around for the size corresponding to maximal contention, and at around as a regular team. These values are consistent with the observed sizes of conversational groups, as well as the hierarchical structuring of Dunbar graphs. We use a model of bipartite trust to derive a scaling law that fits the data and may apply to all group size distributions when these are based on attraction to a seeded group process. In addition to providing further evidence that even spontaneous communities of strangers are self-organizing, the results have important implications for the governance of the Wikipedia commons and for the security of all online social platforms and associations.

摘要

人类社群具有自组织特性,其中特定的邓巴数可用于解释群体依恋。通过分析维基百科广泛主题页面的编辑历史,我们发现,为编辑主题文本内容而形成的临时群体规模存在一种涌现的连贯性,对应最大争议的规模有两个峰值,平均约为[具体数值1],作为常规团队的规模平均约为[具体数值2]。这些值与观察到的对话群体规模以及邓巴图的层次结构一致。我们使用二分信任模型推导出一个符合数据的标度律,当所有群体规模分布基于对种子群体过程的吸引力时,该标度律可能适用于所有群体规模分布。除了进一步证明即使是陌生人的自发社群也具有自组织性外,这些结果对维基百科 Commons 的治理以及所有在线社交平台和协会的安全具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1df6/11444758/c741f1838412/rsos.240514.f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1df6/11444758/3be99cddc7ba/rsos.240514.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1df6/11444758/afad3d876e2d/rsos.240514.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1df6/11444758/2dbf3b93558a/rsos.240514.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1df6/11444758/366457a17715/rsos.240514.f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1df6/11444758/c741f1838412/rsos.240514.f005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1df6/11444758/3be99cddc7ba/rsos.240514.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1df6/11444758/afad3d876e2d/rsos.240514.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1df6/11444758/2dbf3b93558a/rsos.240514.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1df6/11444758/366457a17715/rsos.240514.f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1df6/11444758/c741f1838412/rsos.240514.f005.jpg

相似文献

1
Causal evidence for social group sizes from Wikipedia editing data.来自维基百科编辑数据的社会群体规模的因果证据。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Oct 2;11(10):240514. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240514. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
The Third Man: hierarchy formation in Wikipedia.《第三人:维基百科中的层级形成》
Appl Netw Sci. 2017;2(1):24. doi: 10.1007/s41109-017-0043-2. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
3
Intellectual interchanges in the history of the massive online open-editing encyclopedia, Wikipedia.大型在线开放编辑百科全书 Wikipedia 的历史上的知识交流。
Phys Rev E. 2016 Jan;93(1):012307. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.012307. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
4
Library instruction and Wikipedia: investigating students' perceived information literacy, lifelong learning, and social responsibility through Wikipedia editing.图书馆教学与维基百科:通过编辑维基百科探究学生的信息素养、终身学习和社会责任感。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Apr 1;110(2):174-184. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1291.
5
Motivations for contributing to health-related articles on Wikipedia: an interview study.为维基百科上与健康相关的文章做贡献的动机:一项访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Dec 3;16(12):e260. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3569.
6
Pharmacy students can improve access to quality medicines information by editing Wikipedia articles.药学专业学生可以通过编辑维基百科上的文章来提高获取高质量药品信息的途径。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1375-z.
7
Adding evidence of the effects of treatments into relevant Wikipedia pages: a randomised trial.将治疗效果的证据添加到相关的维基百科页面中:一项随机试验。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 20;10(2):e033655. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033655.
8
Effectiveness of The Wikipedia Collaboration of Dental Schools' Training Programme: a new Paradigm for Teaching and Learning of Evidence-Based Dentistry.牙科学院维基百科协作培训计划的效果:循证牙医学教学的新模式。
Community Dent Health. 2022 Mar 1;39(1):22-26. doi: 10.1922/CDH_00091Tan05.
9
Crowdsourcing Knowledge Production of COVID-19 Information on Japanese Wikipedia in the Face of Uncertainty: Empirical Analysis.面对不确定性,在日维基百科上众包新冠信息知识生产:实证分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 29;25:e45024. doi: 10.2196/45024.
10
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Beyond Dunbar circles: a continuous description of social relationships and resource allocation.超越邓巴数:社会关系与资源分配的连续描述
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 10;12(1):2287. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06066-1.
2
Structure and function in human and primate social networks: implications for diffusion, network stability and health.人类和灵长类动物社交网络的结构与功能:对传播、网络稳定性及健康的影响
Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020 Aug;476(2240):20200446. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2020.0446. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
3
Relating size and functionality in human social networks through complexity.
通过复杂性关联人类社交网络中的规模和功能。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 4;117(31):18355-18358. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2006875117. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
4
Cognitive resource allocation determines the organization of personal networks.认知资源分配决定了个人网络的组织方式。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Aug 14;115(33):8316-8321. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1719233115. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
5
The Anatomy of Friendship.《友谊的解剖》
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Jan;22(1):32-51. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.10.004.
6
What Shall We Talk about in Farsi? : Content of Everyday Conversations in Iran.我们用波斯语谈些什么?:伊朗日常对话的内容
Hum Nat. 2017 Dec;28(4):423-433. doi: 10.1007/s12110-017-9300-4.
7
Human conversational behavior.人类对话行为。
Hum Nat. 1997 Sep;8(3):231-46. doi: 10.1007/BF02912493.
8
Processing power limits social group size: computational evidence for the cognitive costs of sociality.处理能力限制了社会群体的规模:社交性的认知成本的计算证据。
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Jun 26;280(1765):20131151. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.1151. Print 2013 Aug 22.
9
Dynamics of conflicts in Wikipedia.维基百科中的冲突动态。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038869. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
10
Relationships and the social brain: integrating psychological and evolutionary perspectives.关系与社会大脑:整合心理学和进化观点。
Br J Psychol. 2012 May;103(2):149-68. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02061.x. Epub 2011 Jul 25.