Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 20;10(2):e033655. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033655.
To investigate the effects of adding high-grade quantitative evidence of outcomes of treatments into relevant Wikipedia pages on further information-seeking behaviour by the use of routinely collected data.
Wikipedia, Cochrane summary pages and the Cochrane Library.
Randomised trial.
Wikipedia pages which were highly relevant to up-to-date Cochrane Schizophrenia systematic reviews that contained a Summary of Findings table.
Eligible Wikipedia pages in the intervention group were seeded with tables of best evidence of the effects of care and hyperlinks to the source Cochrane review. Eligible Wikipedia pages in the control group were left unchanged.
Routinely collected data on access to the full text and summary web page (after 12 months).
We randomised 70 Wikipedia pages (100% follow-up). Six of the 35 Wikipedia pages in the intervention group had the tabular format deleted during the study but all pages continued to report the same data within the text. There was no evidence of effect on either of the coprimary outcomes: full-text access adjusted ratio of geometric means 1.30, 95% CI: 0.71 to 2.38; page views 1.14, 95% CI: 0.6 to 2.13. Results were similar for all other outcomes, with exception of Altmetric score for which there was some evidence of clear effect (1.36, 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.78).
The pursuit of fair balance within Wikipedia healthcare pages is impressive and its reach unsurpassed. For every person who sought and clicked the reference on the 'intervention' Wikipedia page to seek more information (the primary outcome), many more are likely to have been informed by the page alone. Enriching Wikipedia content is, potentially, a powerful way to improve health literacy and it is possible to test the effects of seeding pages with evidence. This trial should be replicated, expanded and developed.
IRCT2017070330407N2.
通过使用常规收集的数据,研究在相关维基百科页面中添加治疗结果的高质量定量证据对进一步信息搜索行为的影响。
维基百科、Cochrane 摘要页面和 Cochrane 图书馆。
随机试验。
与最新 Cochrane 精神分裂症系统评价高度相关且包含“结果总结表”的维基百科页面。
干预组中符合条件的维基百科页面中植入了最佳护理效果证据的表格和到源 Cochrane 综述的超链接。对照组中符合条件的维基百科页面保持不变。
12 个月后对全文和摘要网页的访问量(常规收集数据)。
我们随机分配了 70 个维基百科页面(100%的随访率)。干预组的 35 个维基百科页面中有 6 个在研究过程中删除了表格格式,但所有页面继续在文本中报告相同的数据。两种主要结局均未观察到效果:全文访问调整后的几何均数比 1.30,95%置信区间:0.71 至 2.38;网页浏览量 1.14,95%置信区间:0.6 至 2.13。所有其他结局的结果相似,除了 Altmetric 评分,其效果有一些证据(1.36,95%置信区间:1.05 至 1.78)。
在维基百科医疗保健页面中追求公平平衡的做法令人印象深刻,其影响力无可比拟。对于每一个搜索并点击“干预”维基百科页面上的参考文献以寻求更多信息的人(主要结局),可能还有更多人仅仅通过页面就获得了信息。丰富维基百科的内容可能是提高健康素养的有力方式,并且有可能测试用证据对页面进行播种的效果。应该重复、扩展和开发这项试验。
IRCT2017070330407N2。