• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药学专业学生可以通过编辑维基百科上的文章来提高获取高质量药品信息的途径。

Pharmacy students can improve access to quality medicines information by editing Wikipedia articles.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1375-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-018-1375-z
PMID:30454046
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6245851/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pharmacy training programs commonly ask students to develop or edit drug monographs that summarize key information about new medicines as an academic exercise. We sought to expand on this traditional approach by having students improve actual medicines information pages posted on Wikipedia.

METHODS

We placed students (n = 119) in a required core pharmacy course into groups of four and assigned each group a specific medicines page on Wikipedia to edit. Assigned pages had high hit rates, suggesting that the topics were of interest to the wider public, but were of low quality, suggesting that the topics would benefit from improvement efforts. We provided course trainings about editing Wikipedia. We evaluated the assignment by surveying student knowledge and attitudes and reviewing the edits on Wikipedia.

RESULTS

Completing the course trainings increased student knowledge of Wikipedia editing practices. At the end of the assignment, students had a more nuanced understanding of Wikipedia as a resource. Student edits improved substantially the quality of the articles edited, their edits were retained for at least 30 days after course completion, and the average number page views of their edited articles increased.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that engaging pharmacy students in a Wikipedia editing assignment is a feasible alternative to writing drug monographs as a classroom assignment. Both tasks provide opportunities for students to demonstrate their skills at researching and explaining drug information but only one serves to improve wider access to quality medicines information. Wikipedia editing assignments are feasible for large groups of pharmacy students and effective in improving publicly available information on one of the most heavily accessed websites globally.

摘要

背景

药学培训计划通常要求学生编写或编辑药品专论,以总结新药的关键信息,作为学术练习。我们试图通过让学生改进发布在维基百科上的实际药品信息页面来扩展这种传统方法。

方法

我们将学生(n=119)分为四人一组,安排每个小组编辑维基百科上的一个特定药品页面。分配的页面点击率很高,这表明这些主题引起了广大公众的兴趣,但质量较低,这表明这些主题需要改进。我们提供了有关编辑维基百科的课程培训。我们通过调查学生的知识和态度以及审查在维基百科上的编辑来评估作业。

结果

完成课程培训增加了学生对维基百科编辑实践的了解。在作业结束时,学生对维基百科作为一种资源有了更细致的了解。学生的编辑大大提高了所编辑文章的质量,他们的编辑在课程结束后至少保留了 30 天,并且编辑文章的平均页面浏览量增加。

结论

我们的结果表明,让药学学生参与维基百科编辑任务是替代编写药品专论作为课堂作业的一种可行选择。这两个任务都为学生提供了研究和解释药品信息的机会,但只有一个任务可以改善更广泛的获取高质量药品信息的机会。维基百科编辑任务对于大量药学学生来说是可行的,并且可以有效地改进全球访问量最大的网站之一上的公开信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af5a/6245851/8abe7e650a6f/12909_2018_1375_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af5a/6245851/f042a2f00d8b/12909_2018_1375_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af5a/6245851/8abe7e650a6f/12909_2018_1375_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af5a/6245851/f042a2f00d8b/12909_2018_1375_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af5a/6245851/8abe7e650a6f/12909_2018_1375_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Pharmacy students can improve access to quality medicines information by editing Wikipedia articles.药学专业学生可以通过编辑维基百科上的文章来提高获取高质量药品信息的途径。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1375-z.
2
Why Medical Schools Should Embrace Wikipedia: Final-Year Medical Student Contributions to Wikipedia Articles for Academic Credit at One School.医学院为何应接纳维基百科:一所学校的医学专业大四学生为获取学术学分而对维基百科文章所做的贡献
Acad Med. 2017 Feb;92(2):194-200. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001381.
3
Integrating Wikipedia editing into health professions education: a curricular inventory and review of the literature.将维基百科编辑融入卫生专业教育:课程清单及文献综述
Perspect Med Educ. 2020 Dec;9(6):333-342. doi: 10.1007/s40037-020-00620-1. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
4
Learning chronobiology by improving Wikipedia.通过改进维基百科来学习时间生物学。
J Biol Rhythms. 2012 Aug;27(4):333-6. doi: 10.1177/0748730412449578.
5
Improving the Quality of Consumer Health Information on Wikipedia: Case Series.提高维基百科上消费者健康信息的质量:病例系列
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 18;21(3):e12450. doi: 10.2196/12450.
6
Can pharmacy students use Wikipedia as a learning resource? Critical assessment of articles on chemotherapeutic drugs.药学专业学生能否将维基百科作为学习资源?对化疗药物相关文章的批判性评估。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2023 Jun 1;47(2):333-345. doi: 10.1152/advan.00212.2022. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
7
Motivations for contributing to health-related articles on Wikipedia: an interview study.为维基百科上与健康相关的文章做贡献的动机:一项访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Dec 3;16(12):e260. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3569.
8
Teaching Evidence-Based Medicine to Medical Students Using Wikipedia as a Platform.用维基百科作为平台向医学生教授循证医学。
Acad Med. 2020 Mar;95(3):382-386. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003085.
9
Quality of Male and Female Medical Content on English-Language Wikipedia: Quantitative Content Analysis.英文-维基百科上的男性和女性医学内容质量:定量内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 12;26:e47562. doi: 10.2196/47562.
10
Quality of information sources about mental disorders: a comparison of Wikipedia with centrally controlled web and printed sources.精神障碍相关信息源质量:维基百科与集中控制的网络和印刷资源的比较。
Psychol Med. 2012 Aug;42(8):1753-62. doi: 10.1017/S003329171100287X. Epub 2011 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Citations in Wikipedia for understanding research reach.维基百科中的引文对了解研究影响力的作用。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2024 Apr 1;112(2):88-94. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2024.1730. Epub 2024 May 22.
2
Leveraging Wikipedia in undergraduate health sciences education: a key tool for information literacy and knowledge translation.在本科健康科学教育中利用维基百科:信息素养和知识转化的关键工具。
J Can Health Libr Assoc. 2023 Dec 1;44(3):79-84. doi: 10.29173/jchla29688. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Wikipedia as an academic service-learning tool in science and technology: higher education case from Siberia.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of Pharmacy Student Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Web 2.0 Tools for Educational Purposes.药学专业学生对用于教育目的的Web 2.0工具的认知与态度分析
J Pharm Technol. 2015 Jun;31(3):127-134. doi: 10.1177/8755122514565907. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
2
More than 2 billion pairs of eyeballs: Why aren't you sharing medical knowledge on Wikipedia?超过20亿双眼睛:你为什么不在维基百科上分享医学知识呢?
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2019 Jun;24(3):90-91. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111040. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
3
A comparison of the content and primary literature support for online medication information provided by Lexicomp and Wikipedia.
维基百科作为科技领域的学术服务学习工具:来自西伯利亚的高等教育案例
J Community Genet. 2024 Apr;15(2):147-161. doi: 10.1007/s12687-023-00692-6. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
4
Wikipedia page views for health research: a review.维基百科健康研究页面浏览量:一项综述
Front Big Data. 2023 Jul 4;6:1199060. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2023.1199060. eCollection 2023.
5
The Promotion of Hearing Health through Wikipedia Campaigns: Article Quality and Reach Assessment.通过维基百科活动促进听力健康:文章质量与传播范围评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 27;11(11):1572. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11111572.
6
Library instruction and Wikipedia: investigating students' perceived information literacy, lifelong learning, and social responsibility through Wikipedia editing.图书馆教学与维基百科:通过编辑维基百科探究学生的信息素养、终身学习和社会责任感。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Apr 1;110(2):174-184. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1291.
7
Expanding Reach of Occupational Health Knowledge: Contributing Subject-Matter Expertise to Wikipedia as a Class Assignment.拓展职业健康知识的传播范围:作为课堂作业为维基百科贡献专业知识。
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211035735. doi: 10.1177/00469580211035735.
8
Reader engagement with medical content on Wikipedia.读者对维基百科上医学内容的参与度。
Elife. 2020 Mar 6;9:e52426. doi: 10.7554/eLife.52426.
9
Situating Wikipedia as a health information resource in various contexts: A scoping review.将维基百科置于不同情境下的健康信息资源:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 18;15(2):e0228786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228786. eCollection 2020.
10
Is Medical Education Ready for Universal Open Access to Research?医学教育是否已为研究成果的普遍开放获取做好准备?
J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Dec;11(6):621-623. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00699.1.
Lexicomp和维基百科提供的在线药物信息的内容及原始文献支持的比较。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Jul;106(3):352-360. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.256. Epub 2018 Jul 1.
4
Is knee pain information on YouTube videos perceived to be helpful? An analysis of user comments and implications for dissemination on social media.YouTube视频上的膝盖疼痛信息被认为有帮助吗?对用户评论的分析及其在社交媒体上传播的启示。
Digit Health. 2017 Mar 29;3:2055207617698908. doi: 10.1177/2055207617698908. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.
5
Italian Wikipedia and epilepsy: An infodemiological study of online information-seeking behavior.意大利维基百科与癫痫:一项关于在线信息寻求行为的信息流行病学研究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Apr;81:119-122. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.01.037. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
6
Readability and quality of wikipedia pages on neurosurgical topics.维基百科上神经外科主题页面的可读性和质量。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018 Mar;166:66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.01.021. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
7
Comparison of the Impact of Wikipedia, UpToDate, and a Digital Textbook on Short-Term Knowledge Acquisition Among Medical Students: Randomized Controlled Trial of Three Web-Based Resources.维基百科、UpToDate和数字教科书对医学生短期知识获取影响的比较:三种基于网络资源的随机对照试验
JMIR Med Educ. 2017 Oct 31;3(2):e20. doi: 10.2196/mededu.8188.
8
SEED: a tool for disseminating systematic review data into Wikipedia.SEED:一种将系统评价数据传播到维基百科的工具。
Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 17;6(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0607-3.
9
Evolution of Wikipedia's medical content: past, present and future.维基百科医学内容的演变:过去、现在和未来。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Nov;71(11):1122-1129. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-208601. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
10
Academics can help shape Wikipedia.学者可以帮助塑造维基百科。
Science. 2017 Aug 11;357(6351):557-558. doi: 10.1126/science.aao0462. Epub 2017 Aug 10.