• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一家大型地区综合医院中机器人辅助结直肠癌手术的可行性、临床结果及学习曲线:一项队列研究

Feasibility, clinical outcomes, and learning curves of robotic-assisted colorectal cancer surgery in a high-volume district general hospital: a cohort study.

作者信息

Massias Samuel, Vadhwana Bhamini, Arjomandi Rad Arian, Hollingshead James, Patel Vanash

机构信息

Department of Surgery, West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford General Hospital.

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Sep 10;86(10):5744-5749. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002545. eCollection 2024 Oct.

DOI:10.1097/MS9.0000000000002545
PMID:39359778
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11444557/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) is one of the most influential surgical advances with widespread clinical and health-economic benefits. West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospital NHS Trust was the first in the UK to simultaneously integrate two CMR Surgical Versius robots. This study aims to investigate clinical outcomes of RAS, explore surgeon learning curves and assess the feasibility of implementation within a district general hospital (DGH).

METHODS

A prospective cohort study of 100 consecutive patient data were collected between July 2022 and August 2023, including demographics, operative and clinical variables, and compared with laparoscopic surgery (LS) data from the National Bowel Cancer Audit. Surgeon learning curves were analysed using sequential surgical and console times.

RESULTS

In the RAS cohort, the median age was 70 (IQR 57-78 years) and 60% were male. Retrieval of a minimum of 12 lymph nodes significantly increased in RAS compared to LS (95% vs. 88%, =0.05). The negative mesorectal margin rate was similar between RAS and LS (97% vs. 91%, =0.10), as well as length of stay greater than 5 days (42% vs. 39%, =0.27). For anterior resections performed by the highest volume surgeon (=16), surgical time was reduced over 1 year by 35% (304.9-196.9 min), whilst console time increased by 111% (63.0-132.8 min).

CONCLUSIONS

Key quality performance indicators were either unchanged or improved with RAS. There is potential for improved theatre utilisation and cost-savings with increased RAS. This study demonstrates the feasibility and easy integration of robotic platforms into DGHs, offering wider training opportunities for the next generation of surgeons.

摘要

引言

机器人辅助手术(RAS)是最具影响力的外科进展之一,具有广泛的临床和健康经济效益。西赫特福德郡教学医院国民保健服务信托基金是英国第一家同时整合两台CMR Surgical Versius机器人的医院。本研究旨在调查RAS的临床结果,探索外科医生的学习曲线,并评估在地区综合医院(DGH)实施的可行性。

方法

对2022年7月至2023年8月期间连续收集的100例患者数据进行前瞻性队列研究,包括人口统计学、手术和临床变量,并与国家肠癌审计的腹腔镜手术(LS)数据进行比较。使用连续手术时间和控制台时间分析外科医生的学习曲线。

结果

在RAS队列中,中位年龄为70岁(四分位间距57 - 78岁),60%为男性。与LS相比,RAS中至少获取12个淋巴结的比例显著增加(95%对88%,P = 0.05)。RAS和LS之间的直肠系膜切缘阴性率相似(97%对91%,P = 0.10),住院时间大于5天的比例也相似(42%对39%,P = 0.27)。对于手术量最高的外科医生(n = 16)进行的前切除术,手术时间在1年内减少了35%(304.9 - 196.9分钟),而控制台时间增加了111%(63.0 - 132.8分钟)。

结论

RAS的关键质量绩效指标要么保持不变,要么有所改善。随着RAS的增加,手术室利用率有提高和节省成本的潜力。本研究证明了将机器人平台整合到DGH中的可行性和易操作性,为下一代外科医生提供了更广泛的培训机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad08/11444557/856212a22c2d/ms9-86-5744-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad08/11444557/0421e66ff96f/ms9-86-5744-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad08/11444557/856212a22c2d/ms9-86-5744-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad08/11444557/0421e66ff96f/ms9-86-5744-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad08/11444557/856212a22c2d/ms9-86-5744-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Feasibility, clinical outcomes, and learning curves of robotic-assisted colorectal cancer surgery in a high-volume district general hospital: a cohort study.一家大型地区综合医院中机器人辅助结直肠癌手术的可行性、临床结果及学习曲线:一项队列研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Sep 10;86(10):5744-5749. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002545. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Effective implementation and adaptation of structured robotic colorectal programme in a busy tertiary unit.在繁忙的三级单位中有效实施和调整结构化机器人结直肠手术方案。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Oct;15(5):731-739. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01169-1. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
3
Evaluation of an established colorectal robotic programme at an NHS district general hospital: audit of outcomes and systematic review of published data.评价一家 NHS 地区综合医院中已建立的结直肠机器人手术项目:对结果进行审计,并对已发表数据进行系统评价。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Oct 24;408(1):416. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03152-4.
4
A review of clinical and oncological outcomes following the introduction of the first robotic colorectal surgery programme to a university teaching hospital in Ireland using a dual console training platform.对爱尔兰一家大学教学医院引入首个使用双控制台训练平台的机器人结直肠手术项目后的临床和肿瘤学结果进行的综述。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Dec;14(6):889-896. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01073-8. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
5
Implementation of the Versius robotic surgical system for colorectal cancer surgery: First clinical experience.Versius 机器人结直肠手术系统的实施:初步临床经验。
Colorectal Dis. 2021 May;23(5):1233-1238. doi: 10.1111/codi.15568. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
6
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.机器人辅助微创手术在妇科和泌尿外科肿瘤学中的应用:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(27):1-118. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
7
Comparison of robotic vs laparoscopic left-sided colorectal cancer resections.机器人与腹腔镜左半结直肠切除术的比较。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Feb;17(1):205-213. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01414-9. Epub 2022 May 24.
8
Credentialing for robotic lobectomy: what is the learning curve? A retrospective analysis of 272 consecutive cases by a single surgeon.机器人肺叶切除术的认证:学习曲线是什么?单外科医生对 272 例连续病例的回顾性分析。
J Robot Surg. 2019 Oct;13(5):663-669. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-00902-1. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
9
Comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and oncological results between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer by multiple surgeon implementation: a propensity score-matched analysis.多外科医生实施机器人辅助与腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌的短期结局和肿瘤学结果的对比分析:倾向评分匹配分析。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):3013-3023. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01736-2. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
10
Robotic-assisted surgery for left-sided colon and rectal resections is associated with reduction in the postoperative surgical stress response and improved short-term outcomes: a cohort study.机器人辅助左半结肠和直肠切除术与减少术后手术应激反应和改善短期结局相关:一项队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2577-2592. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10749-3. Epub 2024 Mar 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer and Cost-Effectiveness.直肠癌的机器人手术与成本效益
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2019 Dec 15;22(4):139-149. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2019.22.4.139.
2
Robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients in terms of recovery time: a monocentric experience.机器人与腹腔镜结直肠手术在老年患者恢复时间方面的比较:一项单中心经验。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Aug;16(4):981-987. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01332-2. Epub 2021 Nov 7.
3
Outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: propensity-matched analysis of the National Clinical Database in Japan.
机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜低位前切除术治疗直肠癌患者的结局比较:来自日本国家临床数据库的倾向性匹配分析。
BJS Open. 2021 Sep 6;5(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab083.
4
Trends in the Adoption of Robotic Surgery for Common Surgical Procedures.常见手术中机器人手术采用趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918911. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18911.
5
Robot assisted versus laparoscopic suturing learning curve in a simulated setting.机器人辅助与腹腔镜缝合在模拟环境中的学习曲线。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3679-3689. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07263-2. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
6
Comparison of pathological outcomes between robotic rectal cancer surgery and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis based on seven randomized controlled trials.机器人直肠癌手术与腹腔镜直肠癌手术的病理结局比较:基于 7 项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Med Robot. 2019 Oct;15(5):e2027. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2027. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
7
The oncological and surgical safety of robot-assisted surgery in colorectal cancer: outcomes of a longitudinal prospective cohort study.机器人辅助手术在结直肠癌中的肿瘤学和外科安全性:一项纵向前瞻性队列研究的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Nov;33(11):3644-3655. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06653-2. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
8
Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis.机器人手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌:一项采用序贯试验分析的系统评价和Meta分析
World J Surg. 2019 Apr;43(4):1146-1161. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-04896-7.
9
The role of robotics in colorectal surgery.机器人技术在结直肠手术中的作用。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 Sep;100(Suppl 7):42-53. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.supp2.42.
10
The cost of conversion in robotic and laparoscopic colorectal surgery.机器人和腹腔镜结直肠手术的转换成本。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1515-1524. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5839-8. Epub 2017 Sep 15.