• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在比较核型形态学研究中,不同的观察者会引入不可忽视的偏差。

Different observers introduce not negligible biases in comparative karyomorphological studies.

作者信息

Peruzzi Lorenzo, Franzoni Jacopo, Tiburtini Manuel, Abidi Emanuela, Alù Emiliano, Barone Giulio, Bianchi Elisabetta, Cataudella Chiara, Di Iorio Emanuela, Guerrina Maria, Mondello Fabio, Paino Luca, Pentassuglia Mario, Porrovecchio Manuela, Rivieccio Giovanni, Siccardi Eugenia, Stinca Adriano, Tei Alessio, Volanti Virginia, Giacò Antonio

机构信息

PLANTSEED Lab, Department of Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

Comp Cytogenet. 2024 Sep 24;18:175-182. doi: 10.3897/compcytogen.18.135172. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3897/compcytogen.18.135172
PMID:39360033
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11445605/
Abstract

Within a practical course of cytotaxonomy organized in Pisa (Italy) on February 2024 by the Group for Floristics, Systematics and Evolution of the Italian Botanical Society, we tested whether using image analysis softwares possible biases are still introduced by different observers. We conclude that observer bias selectively applies in possibly overestimating the length of short arms in a karyotype. As a consequence, the parameters most sensitive to these possible errors are CV and CV, and to a less degree M and THL. To achieve more stable results among observers, a still lacking standardized measurement protocol could be helpful.

摘要

2024年2月,在意大利比萨由意大利植物学会植物区系、系统学与进化小组组织的细胞分类学实践课程中,我们测试了使用图像分析软件时不同观察者是否仍会引入可能的偏差。我们得出结论,观察者偏差有选择地适用于可能高估核型中短臂的长度。因此,对这些可能误差最敏感的参数是CV和CV,其次是M和THL。为了在观察者之间获得更稳定的结果,一个仍缺乏的标准化测量方案可能会有所帮助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/280f/11445605/6cefe5baaf58/comparative_cytogenetics-18-175_article-135172__-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/280f/11445605/c2d65574d393/comparative_cytogenetics-18-175_article-135172__-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/280f/11445605/cd7c0fac8e91/comparative_cytogenetics-18-175_article-135172__-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/280f/11445605/6cefe5baaf58/comparative_cytogenetics-18-175_article-135172__-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/280f/11445605/c2d65574d393/comparative_cytogenetics-18-175_article-135172__-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/280f/11445605/cd7c0fac8e91/comparative_cytogenetics-18-175_article-135172__-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/280f/11445605/6cefe5baaf58/comparative_cytogenetics-18-175_article-135172__-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Different observers introduce not negligible biases in comparative karyomorphological studies.在比较核型形态学研究中,不同的观察者会引入不可忽视的偏差。
Comp Cytogenet. 2024 Sep 24;18:175-182. doi: 10.3897/compcytogen.18.135172. eCollection 2024.
2
A proposal for a multivariate quantitative approach to infer karyological relationships among taxa.一种用于推断分类群间核型关系的多变量定量方法的提议。
Comp Cytogenet. 2014 Dec 10;8(4):337-49. doi: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v8i4.8564. eCollection 2014.
3
Karyotype and genome size variation in white-flowered sect. (Ranunculaceae).毛茛科白花组的核型与基因组大小变异
PhytoKeys. 2021 Dec 31;187:207-227. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.187.75715. eCollection 2021.
4
Comparative karyotype analysis of eight Cucurbitaceae crops using fluorochrome banding and 45S rDNA-FISH.利用荧光带型分析和45S rDNA-FISH技术对八种葫芦科作物进行核型比较分析。
Comp Cytogenet. 2023 Feb 9;17(1):31-58. doi: 10.3897/compcytogen.v17.i1.99236. eCollection 2023.
5
Molecular cytogenetic characterization of 9 populations of four species in the genus (Asparagaceae).天门冬科(Asparagaceae)某属四个物种9个种群的分子细胞遗传学特征分析
Comp Cytogenet. 2024 May 16;18:73-95. doi: 10.3897/compcytogen.18.122399. eCollection 2024.
6
Using carrot centromeric repeats to study karyotype relationships in the genus Daucus (Apiaceae).利用胡萝卜着丝粒重复序列研究胡萝卜属(伞形科)的核型关系。
BMC Genomics. 2021 Jul 6;22(1):508. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-07853-2.
7
Karyotype asymmetry: again, how to measure and what to measure?核型不对称性:再一次,如何测量以及测量什么?
Comp Cytogenet. 2013 Mar 14;7(1):1-9. doi: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v7i1.4431. eCollection 2013.
8
Karyotype and genome size variation in subg. (Ranunculaceae).毛茛科铁线莲亚属的核型与基因组大小变异
PhytoKeys. 2023 Oct 18;234:145-165. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.234.108841. eCollection 2023.
9
A comparative study of two marine catfish (Siluriformes, Ariidae): Cytogenetic tools for determining cytotaxonomy and karyotype evolution.两种海产鲇鱼(鲇形目,甲鲇科)的比较研究:用于确定细胞分类学和核型进化的细胞遗传学工具。
Micron. 2010 Apr;41(3):193-7. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2009.11.004. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
10
Chromosome numbers in plant cytotaxonomy: concepts and implications.植物细胞分类学中的染色体数目:概念与影响
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2008;120(3-4):339-50. doi: 10.1159/000121083. Epub 2008 May 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Basic Image Analysis and Manipulation in ImageJ/Fiji.ImageJ/Fiji 中的基础图像分析与处理。
Curr Protoc. 2023 Jul;3(7):e849. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.849.
2
Mixed-Ploidy and Dysploidy in : A Karyomorphological and Genome Size Study.《中的混合倍性和非整倍性:一项核型形态学和基因组大小研究》 (注:原文冒号前缺少具体研究对象,这里只能按字面翻译出大致意思)
Plants (Basel). 2022 Nov 12;11(22):3068. doi: 10.3390/plants11223068.
3
DRAWID: user-friendly java software for chromosome measurements and idiogram drawing.DRAWID:用于染色体测量和核型图绘制的用户友好型Java软件。
Comp Cytogenet. 2017 Nov 21;11(4):747-757. doi: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v11i4.20830. eCollection 2017.
4
Testing the large genome constraint hypothesis: plant traits, habitat and climate seasonality in Liliaceae.检验大基因组限制假说:百合科植物的性状、栖息地与气候季节性
New Phytol. 2016 Apr;210(2):709-16. doi: 10.1111/nph.13769. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
5
A proposal for a multivariate quantitative approach to infer karyological relationships among taxa.一种用于推断分类群间核型关系的多变量定量方法的提议。
Comp Cytogenet. 2014 Dec 10;8(4):337-49. doi: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v8i4.8564. eCollection 2014.
6
Karyotype asymmetry: again, how to measure and what to measure?核型不对称性:再一次,如何测量以及测量什么?
Comp Cytogenet. 2013 Mar 14;7(1):1-9. doi: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v7i1.4431. eCollection 2013.