• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

课程创新:住院医师自创的每周选择题以强化基于案例的学习。

Curriculum Innovation: A Resident-Created Multiple-Choice Question of the Week to Augment Case-Based Learning.

作者信息

Parasram Melvin, Loiseau Shamelia Y, Yoo Andrea S, Stone Jacqueline B, Ch'ang Judy H, Robbins Matthew S

机构信息

From the Department of Neurology (M.P., S.Y.L., A.S.Y., J.H.C., M.S.R.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York; and Department of Neurology (M.P., S.Y.L., A.S.Y., J.B.S.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Manhattan, NY.

出版信息

Neurol Educ. 2024 Mar 18;3(1):e200119. doi: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200119. eCollection 2024 Mar.

DOI:10.1212/NE9.0000000000200119
PMID:39360150
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11441749/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND PROBLEM STATEMENT

Morning report (MR) has been a foundation of learning in many neurology residency programs. However, fortification of the high-yield learning points during MR cases may be achieved with supplementary educational initiatives to promote effective long-term retention and test-enhanced learning.

OBJECTIVES

During the 2020-2021 academic year, chief residents of our neurology training program sought to implement neurology certification board-style multiple-choice questions (MCQs) based on cases presented at MR to enhance case-based learning.

METHODS AND CURRICULUM DESCRIPTION

A chief resident was selected weekly to write a MCQ based on an instructive case presented in MR from the prior week. The National Board of Medical Examiners item writing guide and online tutorial were used as guidelines for constructing MCQs. MCQs featured a clinical vignette in the question stem, and images were added to augment select cases. The MCQs were distributed using Qualtrics, which generated a web link and tracked anonymous answers. The Qualtrics link was added to the departmental weekly newsletter and labeled question of the week (QOW). Detailed explanations for each QOW were provided. A feedback survey was sent to the departmental education committee after study completion.

RESULTS AND ASSESSMENT OF DATA

Forty MCQs were written by the chief residents, and 1 question was distributed weekly in the departmental newsletter. After week 24, the QOW was restructured to enhance visibility. The mean number of residents who completed the MCQ was 13 (of 29 neurology residents [range 4-29]). The overall median response rate was 38%. When stratified by weeks 1-24 and 25-40 to account for QOW reformatting, the median response rate for weeks 1-24 and weeks 25-40 were 24% and 55%, respectively ( = 0.0013). In a poststudy survey sent to the education committee, 90% of respondents felt that resident-created MCQs were similar to board-style questions and added educational value to resident learning.

DISCUSSION AND LESSONS LEARNED

A chief resident QOW initiative was feasible and led to neurology resident academic engagement and enrichment, which supplemented case-based learning through a test-enhanced learning approach. Resident participation was significantly increased with enhanced visibility of QOW in weekly emails compared with hyperlink format.

摘要

引言与问题陈述

早间病例汇报(MR)一直是许多神经科住院医师培训项目学习的基础。然而,通过补充教育举措强化MR病例中的高价值学习要点,可能有助于促进长期有效记忆和测试强化学习。

目标

在2020 - 2021学年,我们神经科培训项目的总住院医师试图根据MR中呈现的病例实施神经科认证委员会风格的多项选择题(MCQ),以加强基于病例的学习。

方法与课程描述

每周挑选一名总住院医师根据前一周MR中呈现的一个指导性病例编写一道MCQ。美国医学考试委员会的试题编写指南和在线教程被用作构建MCQ的指导。MCQ在题干中设有临床案例,并添加图片以辅助部分案例。这些MCQ通过Qualtrics进行分发,Qualtrics生成一个网页链接并跟踪匿名答案。该Qualtrics链接被添加到部门每周通讯中,并标记为每周问题(QOW)。同时提供了每个QOW的详细解释。研究结束后向部门教育委员会发送了一份反馈调查问卷。

结果与数据评估

总住院医师共编写了40道MCQ,每周在部门通讯中发布1道。在第24周之后,对QOW进行了重新调整以提高其可见性。完成MCQ的住院医师平均人数为13人(神经科住院医师共29人[范围为4 - 29人])。总体中位数回复率为38%。按第1 - 24周和第25 - 40周分层以考虑QOW格式调整,第1 - 24周和第25 - 40周的中位数回复率分别为24%和55%( = 0.0013)。在发送给教育委员会的一项研究后调查中,90%的受访者认为住院医师编写的MCQ与委员会风格的题目相似,并且为住院医师的学习增加了教育价值。

讨论与经验教训

总住院医师发起的QOW举措是可行的,并且促使神经科住院医师参与学术活动并丰富了学习内容,通过测试强化学习方法补充了基于病例的学习。与超链接格式相比,通过在每周电子邮件中提高QOW的可见性,显著提高了住院医师的参与度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b698/11441749/3354e3172a23/NXE-2023-000140f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b698/11441749/80933f170989/NXE-2023-000140f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b698/11441749/3354e3172a23/NXE-2023-000140f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b698/11441749/80933f170989/NXE-2023-000140f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b698/11441749/3354e3172a23/NXE-2023-000140f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Curriculum Innovation: A Resident-Created Multiple-Choice Question of the Week to Augment Case-Based Learning.课程创新:住院医师自创的每周选择题以强化基于案例的学习。
Neurol Educ. 2024 Mar 18;3(1):e200119. doi: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200119. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Management of Poisoned Patients: Implementing a Blended Toxicology Curriculum for Emergency Medicine Residents.中毒患者的管理:为急诊医学住院医师实施混合毒理学课程。
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2022 Apr 15;7(2):C1-C32. doi: 10.21980/J8C937. eCollection 2022 Apr.
3
Training Medical Students to Create and Collaboratively Review Multiple-Choice Questions: A Comprehensive Workshop.培训医学生创建和协作审查多项选择题:综合研讨会。
MedEdPORTAL. 2020 Oct 6;16:10986. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10986.
4
Little Patients, Big Tasks - A Pediatric Emergency Medicine Escape Room.小患者,大任务——一场儿科急诊医学密室逃脱游戏
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 31;8(4):SG1-SG19. doi: 10.21980/J89W70. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.一种由学生主导的新颖方法,用于生成多项选择题并创建在线数据库,同时有针对性地征求临床医生的意见。
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(2):182-8. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1011651.
6
Inclusion of MCQs written by radiology residents in their annual evaluation: innovative method to enhance resident's empowerment?将放射科住院医师编写的多项选择题纳入其年度评估:增强住院医师自主权的创新方法?
Insights Imaging. 2020 Jan 23;11(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0809-4.
7
Design, management, and critical evaluation of a surgical basic/clinical science curriculum: the role of an educational chief resident.外科基础/临床科学课程的设计、管理与批判性评估:教育总住院医师的角色
J Surg Educ. 2008 Jan-Feb;65(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.09.001.
8
Education techniques for lifelong learning: writing multiple-choice questions for continuing medical education activities and self-assessment modules.终身学习的教育技巧:为继续医学教育活动和自我评估模块编写多项选择题。
Radiographics. 2006 Mar-Apr;26(2):543-51. doi: 10.1148/rg.262055145.
9
Medical students create multiple-choice questions for learning in pathology education: a pilot study.医学生在病理学教育中创建多选题进行学习:一项试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Aug 22;18(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1312-1.
10
PeerWise and Pathology: Discontinuing a teaching innovation that did not achieve its potential.同伴互评与病理学:终止一项未发挥其潜力的教学创新。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Oct 14;9:27. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000027.2. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Perspective on pros and cons of microlearning in health education.健康教育中微学习的利弊透视。
Essays Biochem. 2022 Apr 29;66(1):39-44. doi: 10.1042/EBC20210047.
2
Response Rates in Survey Research.调查研究中的回应率。
J Voice. 2021 Sep;35(5):683-684. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.12.043. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
3
A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Views: A Triple Crossover Trial of Visual Abstracts to Examine Their Impact on Research Dissemination.一图胜千言:三重交叉试验研究视觉摘要对研究传播的影响。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 4;22(12):e22327. doi: 10.2196/22327.
4
Global Overview of Response Rates in Patient and Health Care Professional Surveys in Surgery: A Systematic Review.全球手术患者和医护人员调查应答率概述:系统评价。
Ann Surg. 2022 Jan 1;275(1):e75-e81. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004078.
5
Visual abstracts: an innovative way to disseminate scientific Information.可视化摘要:一种传播科学信息的创新方式。
J Bras Nefrol. 2020 Feb 21;42(3):357-360. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2019-0213.
6
Inclusion of MCQs written by radiology residents in their annual evaluation: innovative method to enhance resident's empowerment?将放射科住院医师编写的多项选择题纳入其年度评估:增强住院医师自主权的创新方法?
Insights Imaging. 2020 Jan 23;11(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0809-4.
7
Situated learning theory in health professions education research: a scoping review.健康专业教育研究中的情境学习理论:范围综述。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2020 May;25(2):483-509. doi: 10.1007/s10459-019-09900-w. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
8
Randomized study showing the benefit of medical study writing multiple choice questions on their learning.随机研究表明,在学习中编写医学研究简答题对他们的学习有好处。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jan 31;19(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1469-2.
9
Survey Research.调查研究。
Anesthesiology. 2019 Feb;130(2):192-202. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002436.
10
Choosing medical assessments: Does the multiple-choice question make the grade?选择医学评估:多项选择题能达标吗?
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2018 May-Aug;31(2):65-71. doi: 10.4103/efh.EfH_229_17.