Miller Hailey N, Askew Sandy, Berger Miriam B, Trefney Elizabeth, Blackman Carr Loneke T, Kay Melissa C, Barnes Cherie, Yang Qing, Tyson Crystal C, Svetkey Laura, Shaw Ryan J, Steinberg Dori M, Bennett Gary G
School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Duke Digital Health Science Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 1;10:20552076241281216. doi: 10.1177/20552076241281216. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
Clinical trials often enroll nonrepresentative participant samples, limiting generalizability of trial findings. The current analysis explores the influences of remote recruitment and screening protocols on participation in a digital health intervention (DHI) to promote the evidence-based Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) eating pattern.
Nourish was a 12-month randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of a DHI to an attention control arm among US adults with hypertension. Participants were recruited using digital approaches; eligible individuals completed several screening steps. We examined associations between sociodemographics and mobile technology use and completion of each screening step and compared those characteristics between randomized and nonrandomized participants (those consented but were screened out before randomization).
A total of 678 adults consented to participate in Nourish; 44% of those consented were randomized ( = 301). Those randomized possessed a higher education level ( < 0.0001); were more likely to use health-related apps ( < 0.0001) and wearables ( < 0.0001); and were older ( = 0.01) than nonrandomized individuals. Randomized adults were more likely to use a desktop/laptop/tablet for Internet access (vs mobile phones) ( = 0.01). No significant association was observed existed between sex, race, ethnicity, income, or geographic density of residence and subsequent randomization.
Participants with lower education levels or limited experience in using mobile technologies may require additional support to participate in DHIs. Future research is needed to evaluate remote clinical trial procedures and impacts on generalizability to achieve equitable clinical trial participation.
临床试验通常纳入不具代表性的参与者样本,限制了试验结果的普遍性。当前分析探讨了远程招募和筛查方案对参与数字健康干预(DHI)以推广基于证据的高血压饮食预防(DASH)饮食模式的影响。
“滋养”是一项为期12个月的随机对照试验,比较DHI与注意力控制组对美国高血压成年人的有效性。使用数字方法招募参与者;符合条件的个体完成了几个筛查步骤。我们研究了社会人口统计学和移动技术使用与每个筛查步骤完成情况之间的关联,并比较了随机分组和非随机分组参与者(那些同意但在随机分组前被筛查出的人)之间的这些特征。
共有678名成年人同意参与“滋养”试验;其中44%的同意者被随机分组(n = 301)。随机分组者具有更高的教育水平(P < 0.0001);更有可能使用与健康相关的应用程序(P < 0.0001)和可穿戴设备(P < 0.0001);并且比非随机分组者年龄更大(P = 0.01)。随机分组的成年人更有可能使用台式电脑/笔记本电脑/平板电脑上网(相对于手机)(P = 0.01)。在性别、种族、民族、收入或居住地理密度与随后的随机分组之间未观察到显著关联。
教育水平较低或使用移动技术经验有限的参与者可能需要额外支持才能参与数字健康干预。需要未来的研究来评估远程临床试验程序及其对普遍性的影响,以实现公平的临床试验参与。