Suppr超能文献

单硝酸异山梨酯(依姆多20)与缓释硝酸甘油治疗心绞痛的随机交叉试验。

Randomized crossover trial of isosorbide mononitrate (Elantan 20) and slow-release glyceryl trinitrate in the treatment of angina pectoris.

作者信息

Brodie N H, O'Hara H, O'Hara J, Valle-Jones J C

出版信息

Pharmatherapeutica. 1985;4(6):367-75.

PMID:3936056
Abstract

An open, randomized, comparative crossover clinical trial was carried out to compare the clinical efficacy of 20 mg isosorbide mononitrate 3-times daily and 6.4 mg sustained-release glyceryl trinitrate 3-times daily in the treatment of angina pectoris. Fifty patients entered the trial and 48 patients completed. Each treatment was given for 12 weeks followed by crossover to the alternative drug. Both treatments resulted in marked significant improvements relative to the pre-trial baseline, but isosorbide mononitrate was shown to be significantly (p less than 0.001) more efficacious than sustained-release glyceryl trinitrate in the reduction of the number of angina attacks and sub-lingual glyceryl trinitrate consumption. Angina frequency was lower with isosorbide mononitrate than with sustained-release glyceryl trinitrate in 33 (69%) of the patients, but lower with sustained-release glyceryl trinitrate than with isosorbide mononitrate in only 3 (6%) patients (p less than 0.001). Sub-lingual glyceryl trinitrate consumption was lower with isosorbide mononitrate than with sustained-release glyceryl trinitrate in 36 (75%) patients, but lower with sustained-release glyceryl trinitrate than with isosorbide mononitrate in only 5 (10%) patients. Examination of the effect of changing from isosorbide mononitrate to sustained-release glyceryl trinitrate therapy or vice versa confirmed the clinical superiority of isosorbide mononitrate. Physical exercise capacity was reported as improved in 20 (60%) patients with isosorbide mononitrate but in only 12 (25%) patients with sustained-release glyceryl trinitrate (p less than 0.02). Neither treatment showed any tendency for a reduction in effect during 12-weeks' continuous therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

开展了一项开放、随机、对照交叉临床试验,比较每日3次服用20毫克单硝酸异山梨酯与每日3次服用6.4毫克缓释硝酸甘油治疗心绞痛的临床疗效。50名患者进入试验,48名患者完成试验。每种治疗给药12周,然后交叉使用另一种药物。与试验前基线相比,两种治疗均导致显著改善,但在减少心绞痛发作次数和舌下含服硝酸甘油用量方面,单硝酸异山梨酯显示出比缓释硝酸甘油显著更有效(p<0.001)。33名(69%)患者使用单硝酸异山梨酯时心绞痛发作频率低于使用缓释硝酸甘油时,但仅3名(6%)患者使用缓释硝酸甘油时心绞痛发作频率低于使用单硝酸异山梨酯时(p<0.001)。36名(75%)患者使用单硝酸异山梨酯时舌下含服硝酸甘油用量低于使用缓释硝酸甘油时,但仅5名(10%)患者使用缓释硝酸甘油时舌下含服硝酸甘油用量低于使用单硝酸异山梨酯时。从单硝酸异山梨酯改为缓释硝酸甘油治疗或反之的效果检查证实了单硝酸异山梨酯的临床优越性。据报告,20名(60%)使用单硝酸异山梨酯的患者运动能力有所改善,而使用缓释硝酸甘油的患者中只有12名(25%)运动能力有所改善(p<0.02)。在12周的持续治疗期间,两种治疗均未显示出效果降低的趋势。(摘要截选至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验