• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹膜后与经腹腔腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术; 单外科医生的经验。

Retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy; a single surgeon's experience.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2024 Oct 3;42(1):559. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05265-x.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-024-05265-x
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy procedures.

METHODS

A total of 104 consecutive laparoscopic pyelolithotomy surgeries performed by a single surgeon on patients with staghorn or renal pelvic calculi larger than 20 mm were evaluated. Intraoperative and postoperative clinical parameters from two groups, transperitoneal (TLPL) (N = 55) and retroperitoneal (RLPL) (N = 49), were compared. The surgeon performed TLPL for the first five years and then switched to the RLPL approach for the next five years.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in general demographic variables and stone size (26.55 vs. 24.73 mm, P = 0.8). Operation time and change in serum creatinine levels did not significantly differ between the two approaches. However, patients who underwent TLPL had longer hospital stays than RLPL (3.23 ± 1.21 vs. 2.36 ± 1.10 days, P = 0.0001). Additionally, TLPL was associated with a greater drop in hemoglobin levels (1.53 ± 1.04 vs. 1.17 ± 0.68, P = 0.04), higher rates of postoperative fever (12.7% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The retroperitoneal approach in laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for large renal pelvic stones resulted in fewer postoperative fevers, reduced hemoglobin drops, and shorter hospital stays than the transperitoneal approach. However, the stone-free rates were similar for both groups.

摘要

目的

比较经腹腔和腹膜后腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术的效果。

方法

回顾性分析了 104 例行腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术的患者资料,其中经腹腔途径(TLPL)55 例,经腹膜后途径(RLPL)49 例。比较两组患者的术中及术后临床参数。所有手术均由同一位医生完成,前 5 年采用 TLPL,后 5 年采用 RLPL。

结果

两组患者的一般人口统计学变量和结石大小(26.55mm 比 24.73mm,P=0.8)无显著差异。两种手术方式的手术时间和血清肌酐水平变化无显著差异。但 TLPL 组患者的住院时间长于 RLPL 组(3.23±1.21d 比 2.36±1.10d,P=0.0001)。此外,TLPL 组血红蛋白水平下降更明显(1.53±1.04g/dl 比 1.17±0.68g/dl,P=0.04),术后发热率更高(12.7%比 0.0%,P=0.01)。

结论

对于较大的肾盂结石,与经腹腔途径相比,经腹膜后途径行腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术术后发热更少,血红蛋白下降更少,住院时间更短,但两组的结石清除率相似。

相似文献

1
Retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy; a single surgeon's experience.腹膜后与经腹腔腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术; 单外科医生的经验。
World J Urol. 2024 Oct 3;42(1):559. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05265-x.
2
Comparative analysis of retro vs. transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for large renal stones.后腹腔镜与经腹腔腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术治疗大肾结石的对比分析。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Oct 9;52(1):137. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01640-w.
3
Perioperative and long-term results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: a single-center randomized controlled trial.后腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗鹿角形结石的围手术期和长期结果:一项单中心随机对照试验。
World J Urol. 2019 Jul;37(7):1441-1447. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2526-x. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
4
Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy: is the retroperitoneal route a better approach?腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术:经腹膜后途径是否为更佳入路?
Int J Urol. 2009 Feb;16(2):181-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02210.x. Epub 2008 Dec 2.
5
Randomized controlled trial comparing retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of large renal pelvic calculi: a pilot study.随机对照试验比较后腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗大型肾盂结石:一项初步研究。
J Endourol. 2014 Aug;28(8):946-50. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0064. Epub 2014 May 28.
6
Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelolithotomy for management of staghorn renal calculi.腹腔镜经腹膜肾盂切开取石术治疗鹿角形肾结石
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Jan-Feb;22(1):61-5. doi: 10.1089/lap.2011.0302. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
7
Mini-invasive robotic assisted pyelolithotomy: Comparison between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach.微创机器人辅助肾盂切开取石术:经腹腔与经腹膜后途径的比较。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2019 Jul 2;91(2). doi: 10.4081/aiua.2019.2.107.
8
Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy in patients with previous ipsilateral renal stone surgery.腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术治疗对侧肾结石术后患者。
Urologia. 2021 Feb;88(1):41-45. doi: 10.1177/0391560319890993. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
9
Comparison of the outcomes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty with and without concomitant pyelolithotomy.对比腹腔镜肾盂成形术联合与不联合肾盂切开取石术的治疗效果。
Int Braz J Urol. 2019 Sep-Oct;45(5):965-973. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0781.
10
Robotic Pyelolithotomy, Extended Pyelolithotomy, Nephrolithotomy, and Anatrophic Nephrolithotomy.机器人肾盂切开取石术、扩展肾盂切开取石术、经皮肾镜取石术和腔镜下肾盂输尿管切开取石术。
J Endourol. 2018 May;32(S1):S73-S81. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0718.

本文引用的文献

1
Medium-Term Stone Recurrence after zero-fragment transperitoneal Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy Compared with Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Large Single Renal Pelvis Stones.零碎片经腹腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗大型单发性肾盂结石后的中期结石复发情况比较
Urol J. 2024 Feb 28;21(1):35-39. doi: 10.22037/uj.v20i.7676.
2
Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of large renal stones: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗大型肾结石的疗效及安全性:一项荟萃分析
J Int Med Res. 2021 Jan;49(1):300060520983136. doi: 10.1177/0300060520983136.
3
An Overnight Stay Versus three Days Admission after Uncomplicated Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
单纯经皮肾镜取石术后住院 1 晚与 3 天的随机临床试验
Urol J. 2020 Jun 23;17(4):352-357. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.5314.
4
Role of the gonadal vessels on the stone lodgment in the proximal ureter: Direct observation during laparoscopic ureterolithotomy.性腺血管在近端输尿管结石嵌顿中的作用:腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术中的直接观察
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2018 Sep 30;90(3):163-165. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2018.3.163.
5
Fluoroscopy-free ultrasonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric patients: a single-center experience.无透视超声引导经皮肾镜取石术在小儿患者中的应用:单中心经验。
World J Urol. 2018 Apr;36(4):667-671. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2184-z. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
6
Solo Sonographically Guided PCNL under Spinal Anesthesia: Defining Predictors of Success.脊髓麻醉下超声引导单通道经皮肾镜取石术:确定成功的预测因素
Scientifica (Cairo). 2016;2016:5938514. doi: 10.1155/2016/5938514. Epub 2016 May 3.
7
Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with large renal pelvic stones: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗大肾盂结石患者的安全性和有效性比较:一项荟萃分析
J Investig Med. 2016 Aug;64(6):1134-42. doi: 10.1136/jim-2015-000053. Epub 2016 May 24.
8
Our Experience with Totally Ultrasonography-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Children.我们在儿童完全超声引导经皮肾镜取石术中的经验。
J Endourol. 2021 May;35(5):749-752. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0660. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
9
Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy compared to percutaneous nephrolithotomy as surgical management for large renal pelvic calculi: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾盂大结石的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Urol. 2013 Sep;190(3):888-93. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.092. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
10
Urological laparoendoscopic single site surgery: multi-institutional analysis of risk factors for conversion and postoperative complications.泌尿外科单孔腹腔镜手术:多机构分析中转和术后并发症的危险因素。
J Urol. 2012 Jun;187(6):1989-94. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.01.062. Epub 2012 Apr 11.