Chang Naomi Y, Eichler Clara M A, Amparo Daniel E, Zhou Jiaqi, Baumann Karsten, Cohen Hubal Elaine A, Surratt Jason D, Morrison Glenn C, Turpin Barbara J
Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Picarro Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA.
Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2024 Oct 3. doi: 10.1039/d4em00359d.
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are prevalent in consumer products used indoors. However, few measurements of ionic PFAS exist for indoor air. We analyzed samples collected on PM quartz fiber filters (QFFs) in 11 North Carolina homes 1-3 times in living rooms (two QFFs in series), and immediately outside each home (single QFF), for 26 ionic PFAS as part of the 9 months Indoor PFAS Assessment (IPA) Campaign. All targeted PFAS, except for PFDS and 8:2 monoPAP, were detected indoors. PFBA, PFHpA, PFHxA, PFOA, PFOS, and 6:2 diPAP were detected in >50% of indoor samples. PFHxA, PFOA, and PFOS had the highest detection frequency (DF = 80%; medians = 0.5-0.7 pg m), while median PFBA concentrations (3.6 pg m; DF = 67%) were highest indoors. Residential indoor air concentrations (sum of measured PFAS) were, on average, 3.4 times higher than residential outdoor air concentrations, and an order of magnitude higher than regional background concentrations. Indoor-to-outdoor emission rate estimates suggest that emissions from single unit homes could be a meaningful contributor to PFBA, PFOA, and PFOS emissions in populated areas far from major point sources. Backup QFFs were observed to adsorb some targeted PFAS from the gas-phase, making reported values upper-bounds for particle-phase and lower-bounds for total air (gas plus particle) concentrations. We found that higher concentrations of carbonaceous aerosol were associated with a shift in partitioning of short chain PFCAs and long chain PFSAs toward the particle phase.
全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)在室内使用的消费品中普遍存在。然而,室内空气中离子型PFAS的测量数据很少。作为为期9个月的室内PFAS评估(IPA)活动的一部分,我们对北卡罗来纳州11户家庭客厅(两个串联的石英纤维滤膜(QFF))以及每户房屋外部(单个QFF)采集的样本进行了分析,检测其中26种离子型PFAS。除全氟癸烷磺酸(PFDS)和8:2单全氟辛烷磺酸(8:2 monoPAP)外,所有目标PFAS均在室内被检测到。在超过50%的室内样本中检测到了全氟丁酸(PFBA)、全氟庚酸(PFHpA)、全氟己酸(PFHxA)、全氟辛酸(PFOA)、全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)和6:2二全氟辛烷磺酸(6:2 diPAP)。PFHxA、PFOA和PFOS的检测频率最高(检测频率(DF)= 80%;中位数 = 0.5 - 0.7 pg/m³),而PFBA的中位数浓度(3.6 pg/m³;DF = 67%)在室内最高。住宅室内空气浓度(所测PFAS的总和)平均比住宅室外空气浓度高3.4倍,比区域背景浓度高一个数量级。室内到室外的排放率估计表明,独栋房屋的排放可能是远离主要点源的人口密集地区PFBA、PFOA和PFOS排放的一个重要贡献源。观察到备用QFF会从气相中吸附一些目标PFAS,使得报告值为颗粒相浓度的上限和总空气(气相加颗粒相)浓度的下限。我们发现,较高浓度的碳质气溶胶与短链全氟羧酸(PFCA)和长链全氟磺酸(PFSA)向颗粒相的分配变化有关。