ICF, Durham, North Carolina 27713, United States.
Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Apr 4;57(13):5107-5116. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c07185. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
Given that human biomonitoring surveys show per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) to be ubiquitous, humans can be exposed to PFAS through various sources, including drinking water, food, and indoor environmental media. Data on the nature and level of PFAS in residential environments are required to identify important pathways for human exposure. This work investigated important pathways of exposure to PFAS by reviewing, curating, and mapping evidence for the measured occurrence of PFAS in exposure media. Real-world occurrence for 20 PFAS was targeted primarily in media commonly related to human exposure (outdoor and indoor air, indoor dust, drinking water, food, food packaging, articles, and products, and soil). A systematic-mapping process was implemented to conduct title-abstract and full-text screening and to extract PECO-relevant primary data into comprehensive evidence databases. Parameters of interest included the following: sampling dates and locations, numbers of collection sites and participants, detection frequencies, and occurrence statistics. Detailed data were extracted on PFAS occurrence in indoor and environmental media from 229 references and on PFAS occurrence in human matrices where available from those references. Studies of PFAS occurrence became numerous after 2005. Studies were most abundant for PFOA (80% of the references) and PFOS (77%). Many studies analyzed additional PFAS, particularly, PFNA and PFHxS (60% of references each). Food (38%) and drinking water (23%) were the commonly studied media. Most studies found detectable levels of PFAS, and detectable levels were reported in a majority of states in the United States. Half or more of the limited studies for indoor air and products detected PFAS in 50% or more of the collected samples. The resulting databases can inform problem formulation for systematic reviews to address specific PFAS exposure queries and questions, support prioritization of PFAS sampling, and inform PFAS exposure measurement studies. The search strategy should be extended and implemented to support living evidence review in this rapidly advancing area.
鉴于人体生物监测调查显示全氟和多氟烷基物质 (PFAS) 无处不在,人类可能通过多种途径接触 PFAS,包括饮用水、食物和室内环境介质。需要了解住宅环境中 PFAS 的性质和水平数据,以确定人类接触的重要途径。本研究通过审查、整理和绘制 PFAS 在暴露介质中测量出现的证据,调查了接触 PFAS 的重要途径。主要针对与人类接触相关的常见介质(室外和室内空气、室内灰尘、饮用水、食物、食品包装、物品和产品以及土壤)中 20 种 PFAS 的实际出现情况进行了目标研究。实施了系统映射过程,以进行标题-摘要和全文筛选,并将与 PECO 相关的主要数据提取到综合证据数据库中。感兴趣的参数包括以下内容:采样日期和地点、采集地点和参与者的数量、检测频率和出现统计数据。从 229 篇参考文献中详细提取了室内和环境介质中 PFAS 出现的详细数据,并从这些参考文献中提取了人类基质中 PFAS 出现的详细数据。自 2005 年以来,PFAS 出现的研究数量众多。关于 PFOA(80%的参考文献)和 PFOS(77%)的研究最多。许多研究分析了其他 PFAS,特别是 PFNA 和 PFHxS(各占参考文献的 60%)。食物(38%)和饮用水(23%)是最常研究的介质。大多数研究发现可检测到的 PFAS 水平,并且在美国大多数州都报告了可检测到的水平。在室内空气和产品的有限研究中,有一半或更多的研究在收集的样本中 50%或更多的样本中检测到 PFAS。由此产生的数据库可以为系统审查提供信息,以解决特定的 PFAS 暴露问题,并支持 PFAS 采样的优先级,以及告知 PFAS 暴露测量研究。应扩展和实施搜索策略,以支持在这个快速发展的领域进行实时证据审查。