• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

借鉴《蒙特利尔议定书》,改善全球抗微生物药物耐药性治理。

Learning from the Montreal Protocol to improve the global governance of antimicrobial resistance.

机构信息

Global Strategy Lab, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Oct 3;9(10):e015690. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015690.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015690
PMID:39362698
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11459323/
Abstract

The Montreal Protocol has played a critical role in promoting global collective action to phase out the use of ozone-depleting substances, ultimately preventing millions of cases of skin cancer, cataracts and other health issues related to ultraviolet radiation exposure. This success entails transferable lessons for coordinated action required to improve the global governance of other challenges. Like ozone depletion, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a challenge of the global commons, requiring coordinated actions across human, animal and environmental sectors. We identify equity, flexibility and accountability as three core governance principles that underlie the success of the protocol and employ the 3-i framework to understand how interests, ideas and institutions contributed to the protocol's success. Equity-promoting strategies consisted of an inclusive negotiation process, supporting developing countries with multilateral funding and a progressive compliance model. Flexibility was built into the protocol through the development of country-specific strategies, reorienting incentive structures for industry and facilitating regular amendments in response to emerging scientific evidence. Accountability was promoted by mobilising public advocacy, establishing targets and enforcement mechanisms and conducting independent scientific and technical assessments. Applying our proposed principles presents an opportunity to improve the global governance of AMR. Finally, we acknowledge limitations to our analysis, including our focus on a single environmental treaty, significantly greater funding requirements and multifacetted stakeholder involvement in the case of AMR, differing market and incentives structures in antibiotic development and distribution, and ethical concerns with using trade restrictions as a policy tool.

摘要

《蒙特利尔议定书》在推动全球采取集体行动逐步淘汰消耗臭氧层物质方面发挥了关键作用,最终防止了数以百万计的皮肤癌、白内障和其他与紫外线辐射暴露有关的健康问题。这一成功为协调行动提供了可借鉴的经验,以改善其他挑战的全球治理。与臭氧消耗一样,抗微生物药物耐药性(AMR)是全球公域的一个挑战,需要在人类、动物和环境部门之间采取协调行动。我们确定公平、灵活性和问责制是该议定书成功的三个核心治理原则,并采用 3-i 框架来了解利益、观念和机构如何促成该议定书的成功。促进公平的战略包括包容性谈判进程、为发展中国家提供多边资金支持和逐步遵守模式。通过制定针对具体国家的战略、重新调整行业激励结构以及为应对新出现的科学证据定期修订协议,在协议中纳入了灵活性。通过动员公众宣传、建立目标和执行机制以及进行独立的科学和技术评估,促进了问责制。应用我们提出的原则为改善 AMR 的全球治理提供了机会。最后,我们承认我们的分析存在局限性,包括我们专注于一项单一的环境条约、AMR 需要更多的资金、涉及多方利益相关者、抗生素开发和分销的市场和激励结构不同以及使用贸易限制作为政策工具存在道德问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7d4/11459323/3a71327f3422/bmjgh-9-10-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7d4/11459323/3a71327f3422/bmjgh-9-10-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7d4/11459323/3a71327f3422/bmjgh-9-10-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Learning from the Montreal Protocol to improve the global governance of antimicrobial resistance.借鉴《蒙特利尔议定书》,改善全球抗微生物药物耐药性治理。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Oct 3;9(10):e015690. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015690.
2
Governing antimicrobial resistance: a narrative review of global governance mechanisms.治理抗菌药物耐药性:全球治理机制的叙述性综述。
J Public Health Policy. 2020 Dec;41(4):515-528. doi: 10.1057/s41271-020-00248-9.
3
Implications from COVID-19 for future pandemic global health governance.2019冠状病毒病对未来大流行全球卫生治理的启示。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2024 May;30(5):576-581. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.03.027. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
4
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
5
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
6
The Global Health Architecture: Governance and International Institutions to Advance Population Health Worldwide.全球卫生架构:推进全球人口健康的治理和国际机构。
Milbank Q. 2023 Apr;101(S1):734-769. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12627.
7
Bridging the commitment-compliance gap in global health politics: Lessons from international relations for the global action plan on antimicrobial resistance.弥合全球卫生政治中的承诺-合规差距:国际关系对抗菌药物耐药性全球行动计划的启示。
Glob Public Health. 2021 Jan;16(1):60-74. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1788623. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
8
The global governance of antimicrobial resistance: a cross-country study of alignment between the global action plan and national action plans.抗微生物药物耐药性的全球治理:全球行动计划与国家行动计划一致性的跨国研究。
Global Health. 2020 Nov 11;16(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00639-3.
9
Urban health: an example of a "health in all policies" approach in the context of SDGs implementation.城市健康:在实现可持续发展目标背景下“所有政策促进健康”方法的一个范例。
Global Health. 2019 Dec 18;15(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0529-z.
10
The urban political ecology of antimicrobial resistance: A critical lens on integrative governance.城市环境中的抗生素耐药性:综合治理的批判视角
Soc Sci Med. 2024 May;348:116689. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116689. Epub 2024 Feb 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing a protocol on antimicrobial resistance through WHO's pandemic treaty will protect lives in future pandemics.制定一项关于抗菌素耐药性的协议,通过世卫组织的大流行条约,将在未来的大流行中保护生命。
Global Health. 2024 Jan 31;20(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12992-024-01015-1.
2
A Core Element and Shared Global Responsibility for Pandemic Preparedness and Response.大流行防范和应对的核心要素和共同全球责任。
J Law Med Ethics. 2022;50(S2):34-39. doi: 10.1017/jme.2022.77.
3
Adopting a Global AMR Target within the Pandemic Instrument Will Act as a Catalyst for Action.
在大流行防范与应对基金内采用全球抗微生物药物耐药性目标将作为行动的催化剂。
J Law Med Ethics. 2022;50(S2):64-70. doi: 10.1017/jme.2022.101.
4
Regulating the Global Antimicrobial Commons: Climate Agreements and Beyond.规范全球抗菌共有资源:气候协议及其他。
Health Care Anal. 2023 Mar;31(1):47-52. doi: 10.1007/s10728-023-00454-y. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
5
Application of the Policy Regime Framework to understand COVID-19 policy response in the Southeast U.S.: How RAPID research can provide lessons learned after a public health crisis.应用政策制度框架理解美国东南部对新冠疫情的政策应对:快速研究如何能在公共卫生危机后提供经验教训。
Front Sociol. 2022 Dec 12;7:959553. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.959553. eCollection 2022.
6
Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis.2019 年全球细菌对抗菌药物耐药性的负担:系统分析。
Lancet. 2022 Feb 12;399(10325):629-655. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
7
Global access to existing and future antimicrobials and diagnostics: antimicrobial subscription and pooled procurement.全球获取现有和未来的抗菌药物和诊断试剂:抗菌药物订阅和集中采购。
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Feb;10(2):e293-e297. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00463-0. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
8
Global Health Diplomacy (GHD) and the integration of health into foreign policy: Towards a conceptual approach.全球卫生外交(GHD)与将卫生纳入外交政策:迈向概念方法。
Glob Public Health. 2022 Jun;17(6):1041-1054. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1900318. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
9
The global governance of antimicrobial resistance: a cross-country study of alignment between the global action plan and national action plans.抗微生物药物耐药性的全球治理:全球行动计划与国家行动计划一致性的跨国研究。
Global Health. 2020 Nov 11;16(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00639-3.
10
Governing antimicrobial resistance: a narrative review of global governance mechanisms.治理抗菌药物耐药性:全球治理机制的叙述性综述。
J Public Health Policy. 2020 Dec;41(4):515-528. doi: 10.1057/s41271-020-00248-9.