• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用奈帕芬胺治疗的酒精辅助与经上皮光折射角膜切削术术后疼痛比较:一项新研究

Postoperative Pain Comparison Between Alcohol-Assisted and Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy Using Nepafenac Treatment: A Novel Study.

作者信息

Gomel Nir, Shemesh Nadav, Sorkin Nir, Levinger Nadav, Levinger Shmuel, Hirsch Ami, Achiron Asaf, Levinger Eliya

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 6423906, Tel Aviv, Israel.

The Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Ophthalmol Ther. 2024 Dec;13(12):3049-3057. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-01040-8. Epub 2024 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1007/s40123-024-01040-8
PMID:39363130
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11564457/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The study aimed to compare postoperative pain between alcohol-assisted and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in patients who received the novel analgesic preoperative nepafenac treatment 2 days preoperatively and 3 days postoperatively. Pain, stinging, tearing, light sensitivity, and stress levels were evaluated.

METHODS

The study included a retrospective analysis of 55 patients divided into two groups: bilateral alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy (aa-PRK) and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (transepithelial-PRK). Nepafenac was administered for pain control for all patients, with patients receiving four drops for 2 days before the surgery and 3 days postoperatively per clinical instructions. Patients completed questionnaires on the day of the surgery and for the first 5 days postoperatively. Statistical analysis was performed using XLSTAT (version 2023.1.2). t-Test was used to analyze and compare pain and symptom levels and Fisher's exact test for categorical data. p-Values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The study examined 55 patients (49% female) with a mean age of 25.11 ± 6.81 years who had undergone bilateral surface refractive surgery to correct myopic errors. The mean baseline standard error (SE) was -3.16 ± 2.20 D. Among these patients, 27 patients underwent aa-PRK and 28 patients underwent transepithelial-PRK. Higher levels of pain were significant in the aa-PRK group (p = 0.003). However, there was no significant difference between the groups in the average levels of stinging, tearing, or light sensation. Additionally, stress levels decreased over time in both groups, with levels becoming almost equal after 5 days, and there was no significant difference in the average stress levels between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The study found that patients who underwent the transepithelial-PRK procedure had significantly lower pain levels compared with those who underwent aa-PRK after being treated with nepafenac per protocol. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of stinging, tearing, light sensation, and stress levels.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在比较接受新型镇痛药物萘非那酮术前2天及术后3天治疗的患者,在酒精辅助准分子上皮下角膜磨镶术(aa-PRK)和经上皮准分子角膜切削术(trans-PRK)后的术后疼痛情况。对疼痛、刺痛、流泪、畏光和应激水平进行了评估。

方法

本研究对55例患者进行回顾性分析,分为两组:双侧酒精辅助准分子上皮下角膜磨镶术(aa-PRK)组和经上皮准分子角膜切削术(trans-PRK)组。所有患者均使用萘非那酮控制疼痛,根据临床指示,患者在手术前2天和术后3天每天滴4次。患者在手术当天及术后前5天完成问卷。使用XLSTAT(2023.1.2版)进行统计分析。采用t检验分析和比较疼痛及症状水平,分类数据采用Fisher精确检验。p值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

本研究共纳入55例患者(49%为女性),平均年龄25.11±6.81岁,均接受双侧表面屈光手术以矫正近视。平均基线标准误(SE)为-3.16±2.20D。其中,27例患者接受aa-PRK,28例患者接受trans-PRK。aa-PRK组的疼痛水平更高(p = 0.003)。然而,两组在刺痛、流泪或畏光的平均水平上无显著差异。此外,两组的应激水平均随时间下降,5天后水平几乎相等,两组的平均应激水平无显著差异。

结论

研究发现,按照方案使用萘非那酮治疗后,接受trans-PRK手术的患者疼痛水平明显低于接受aa-PRK手术的患者。然而,两组在刺痛、流泪、畏光和应激水平方面无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46ff/11564457/b3e8d8f50aaa/40123_2024_1040_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46ff/11564457/b3e8d8f50aaa/40123_2024_1040_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46ff/11564457/b3e8d8f50aaa/40123_2024_1040_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Postoperative Pain Comparison Between Alcohol-Assisted and Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy Using Nepafenac Treatment: A Novel Study.使用奈帕芬胺治疗的酒精辅助与经上皮光折射角膜切削术术后疼痛比较:一项新研究
Ophthalmol Ther. 2024 Dec;13(12):3049-3057. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-01040-8. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
2
Epithelial Erosions and Refractive Results After Single-Step Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy and Alcohol-Assisted Photorefractive Keratectomy in Myopic Eyes: A Comparative Evaluation Over 12 Months.近视眼中单步经上皮光屈光性角膜切削术和酒精辅助光屈光性角膜切削术后的上皮糜烂与屈光结果:一项为期12个月的对比评估
Cornea. 2018 Jan;37(1):45-52. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001428.
3
Outcomes of Single-Step Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy Compared With Alcohol-Assisted Photorefractive Keratectomy Using Wave-Light EX500 Platform.使用Wave-Light EX500平台的单步经上皮光折射角膜切削术与酒精辅助光折射角膜切削术的效果比较。
Cureus. 2023 Mar 29;15(3):e36872. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36872. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Effects of nonsteroidal ophthalmic drops on epithelial healing and pain in patients undergoing bilateral photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).非甾体类眼药水对接受双侧准分子激光角膜切削术(PRK)患者上皮愈合及疼痛的影响。
Adv Ther. 2007 Nov-Dec;24(6):1278-85. doi: 10.1007/BF02877774.
5
Double-masked study of the effects of nepafenac 0.1% and ketorolac 0.4% on corneal epithelial wound healing and pain after photorefractive keratectomy.0.1%那法普明和0.4%酮咯酸对屈光性角膜切削术后角膜上皮伤口愈合及疼痛影响的双盲研究。
Adv Ther. 2007 Jul-Aug;24(4):852-62. doi: 10.1007/BF02849978.
6
Comparison of visual and refractive results after transepithelial and mechanical photorefractive keratectomy in myopia.近视患者经上皮与机械性光性屈光性角膜切削术后视觉和屈光结果的比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr;38(2):627-633. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0501-y. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
7
Pain, wound healing and refractive comparison of mechanical and transepithelial debridement in photorefractive keratectomy for myopia: results of 1 year follow-up.近视性准分子激光角膜切削术中机械清创与上皮下清创的疼痛、伤口愈合及屈光比较:1年随访结果
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2014 Dec;37(6):420-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
8
Comparison of postoperative pain following laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy: a prospective, random paired bilateral eye study.准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术与经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术后疼痛比较:一项前瞻性、随机配对双眼研究。
Eye Sci. 2014 Sep;29(3):155-9.
9
Does the introduction of streamlight decrease refractive surgery operating time?导入 SL (Streamlight)是否会减少屈光手术的操作时间?
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Apr 18;44(1):185. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03093-x.
10
Myopia correction with transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy versus femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis: One-year case-matched analysis.经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术与飞秒激光辅助原位角膜磨镶术矫正近视:一年病例匹配分析。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Nov;42(11):1579-1587. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.08.025.

引用本文的文献

1
The added effect of preoperative nepafenac on pain and discomfort following alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy.术前使用萘帕芬酸对酒精辅助准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后疼痛和不适的附加作用。
Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 24;17:25158414251349340. doi: 10.1177/25158414251349340. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Transepithelial Versus Conventional PRK: A Randomized Controlled Study.经上皮与传统准分子原位角膜磨镶术:一项随机对照研究。
Ophthalmol Ther. 2025 Jul;14(7):1567-1579. doi: 10.1007/s40123-025-01167-2. Epub 2025 May 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Excimer Laser Corneal Refractive Surgery in the Clinic: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.准分子激光角膜屈光手术的临床应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jun 15;2022:7130422. doi: 10.1155/2022/7130422. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparison of transepithelial and conventional photorefractive keratectomy in myopic and myopic astigmatism patients: a randomized contralateral trial.比较经上皮和常规光折射性角膜切削术治疗近视和近视散光患者的效果:一项随机对照的对侧试验。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Feb 11;22(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02293-2.
3
Early clinical outcomes and comparison between trans-PRK and PRK, regarding refractive outcome, wound healing, pain intensity and visual recovery time in a real-world setup.
在真实环境中,关于屈光结果、伤口愈合、疼痛强度和视觉恢复时间,比较经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术(trans-PRK)和准分子激光角膜切削术(PRK)的早期临床结果。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr 16;21(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-01941-3.
4
Transepithelial Laser versus Alcohol Assisted Photorefractive Keratectomy Safety and Efficacy: 1-Year Follow-up of a Contralateral Eye Study.经上皮准分子激光与酒精辅助准分子激光角膜切削术安全性和疗效的对比:一项对照眼研究 1 年随访结果
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr;35(2):142-152. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2020.0105. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
5
Outcome comparison between wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.波前引导与波前优化光性折射角膜切削术的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec;68(12):2691-2698. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2921_20.
6
Refractive surgery beyond 2020.2020 年后的屈光手术
Eye (Lond). 2021 Feb;35(2):362-382. doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-1096-5. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
7
Fellow eye comparison between alcohol-assisted and single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy: late mid-term outcomes.酒精辅助与一步式经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术的比较:晚期中期结果。
Rom J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr-Jun;64(2):176-183.
8
Comparison of mechanical debridement and trans-epithelial myopic photorefractive keratectomy: A contralateral eye study.机械清创术与经上皮准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视的对比研究:一项对侧眼研究。
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan 23;31(2):135-141. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2019.01.003. eCollection 2019 Jun.
9
Pain management after photorefractive keratectomy.光折射性角膜切削术后的疼痛管理。
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul;29(4):306-312. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000486.
10
Predicting Refractive Surgery Outcome: Machine Learning Approach With Big Data.
J Refract Surg. 2017 Sep 1;33(9):592-597. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20170616-03.