Department of Microbiology, University of Tennessee Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA.
BMC Genomics. 2024 Oct 3;25(1):922. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10839-5.
The Microcystis mobilome is a well-known but understudied component of this bloom-forming cyanobacterium. Through genomic and transcriptomic comparisons, we found five families of transposases that altered the expression of genes in the well-studied toxigenic type-strain, Microcystis aeruginosa PCC 7086, and a non-toxigenic genetic mutant, Microcystis aeruginosa PCC 7806 ΔmcyB. Since its creation in 1997, the ΔmcyB strain has been used in comparative physiology studies against the wildtype strain by research labs throughout the world. Some differences in gene expression between what were thought to be otherwise genetically identical strains have appeared due to insertion events in both intra- and intergenic regions. In our ΔmcyB isolate, a sulfate transporter gene cluster (sbp-cysTWA) showed differential expression from the wildtype, which may have been caused by the insertion of a miniature inverted repeat transposable element (MITE) in the sulfate-binding protein gene (sbp). Differences in growth in sulfate-limited media also were also observed between the two isolates. This paper highlights how Microcystis strains continue to "evolve" in lab conditions and illustrates the importance of insertion sequences / transposable elements in shaping genomic and physiological differences between Microcystis strains thought otherwise identical. This study forces the necessity of knowing the complete genetic background of isolates in comparative physiological experiments, to facilitate the correct conclusions (and caveats) from experiments.
微囊藻可移动元件是这种形成水华的蓝藻的一个众所周知但研究不足的组成部分。通过基因组和转录组比较,我们发现了五个转座酶家族,它们改变了在研究充分的产毒型模式株微囊藻 aeruginosa PCC 7086 和非产毒遗传突变株微囊藻 aeruginosa PCC 7806 ΔmcyB 中的基因表达。自 1997 年创建以来,ΔmcyB 菌株已被世界各地的研究实验室用于与野生型菌株进行比较生理学研究。由于在基因内和基因间区域发生了插入事件,一些被认为在遗传上完全相同的菌株之间的基因表达差异已经出现。在我们的ΔmcyB 分离株中,硫酸盐转运蛋白基因簇(sbp-cysTWA)的表达与野生型不同,这可能是由于硫酸盐结合蛋白基因(sbp)中插入了一个微型反向重复转座元件(MITE)所致。在两种分离株之间也观察到硫酸盐限制培养基中生长的差异。本文强调了微囊藻菌株在实验室条件下如何继续“进化”,并说明了插入序列/转座元件在塑造微囊藻菌株之间的基因组和生理差异方面的重要性,这些菌株被认为是相同的。这项研究迫使我们在比较生理学实验中必须了解分离株的完整遗传背景,以促进从实验中得出正确的结论(和注意事项)。