• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

斜外侧椎间融合术后需要额外干预的不良结局的危险因素。

Risk Factors of Unsatisfactory Outcomes Requiring Additional Intervention Following Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion.

作者信息

Limthongkul Worawat, Chaiwongwattana Bandid, Kerr Stephen J, Tanasansomboon Teerachat, Kotheeranurak Vit, Yingsakmongkol Wicharn, Singhatanadgige Weerasak

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

Center of Excellence in Biomechanics and Innovative Spine Surgery, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Neurospine. 2024 Sep;21(3):845-855. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448344.172. Epub 2024 Sep 30.

DOI:10.14245/ns.2448344.172
PMID:39363464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11456943/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is a minimally invasive procedure for stabilizing the spine and indirectly decompressing the neural elements. There is sparse data on unsatisfactory outcomes that require additional interventions (surgery or intervention) after OLIF. This study aimed to identify the causes, and risk factors of these reintervention.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study of the patients who underwent the OLIF procedure from June 2016 to March 2023. Several clinical and radiographic parameters were studied. We also analyzed associations between several potential risk factors and the reintervention following OLIF.

RESULTS

A total of 231 patients were included. Over an average of 2.5 years of follow-up, 28 patients (12.1%) required a reintervention. Adjacent segment disease (ASD) was the most common cause of reintervention. The risk factors associated with reintervention were previous surgery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-16.33; p=0.02) and high preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores (aOR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00-1.08; p=0.03). Although increasing the duration of follow-up was not statistically significant, the 95% CI was consistent with an increased risk of reintervention with longer follow-up (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.94-1.50).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that patients with prior lumbar surgery and high preoperative ODI scores were more likely to require additional intervention after the OLIF procedure. In addition, an increasing duration of follow-up was associated with an increased risk of reintervention. The most common reason for reintervention was ASD after OLIF.

摘要

目的

斜外侧椎间融合术(OLIF)是一种用于稳定脊柱并间接减压神经结构的微创手术。关于OLIF术后效果不佳需要额外干预(手术或介入)的数据稀少。本研究旨在确定这些再次干预的原因及危险因素。

方法

这是一项对2016年6月至2023年3月期间接受OLIF手术患者的单中心回顾性研究。研究了多个临床和影像学参数。我们还分析了几个潜在危险因素与OLIF术后再次干预之间的关联。

结果

共纳入231例患者。平均随访2.5年,28例患者(12.1%)需要再次干预。相邻节段疾病(ASD)是再次干预最常见的原因。与再次干预相关的危险因素为既往手术(调整比值比[aOR],4.44;95%置信区间[CI],1.21 - 16.33;p = 0.02)和术前Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分高(aOR,1.04;95% CI,1.00 - 1.08;p = 0.03)。虽然随访时间延长在统计学上无显著意义,但95% CI与随访时间延长导致再次干预风险增加一致(OR,1.18;95% CI,0.94 - 1.50)。

结论

本研究表明,既往有腰椎手术史且术前ODI评分高的患者在OLIF术后更有可能需要额外干预。此外,随访时间延长与再次干预风险增加相关。再次干预最常见的原因是OLIF术后的ASD。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d424/11456943/d1e6d415e643/ns-2448344-172f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d424/11456943/6f5c2b59963d/ns-2448344-172f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d424/11456943/718ccfe9ea27/ns-2448344-172f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d424/11456943/d1e6d415e643/ns-2448344-172f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d424/11456943/6f5c2b59963d/ns-2448344-172f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d424/11456943/718ccfe9ea27/ns-2448344-172f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d424/11456943/d1e6d415e643/ns-2448344-172f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk Factors of Unsatisfactory Outcomes Requiring Additional Intervention Following Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion.斜外侧椎间融合术后需要额外干预的不良结局的危险因素。
Neurospine. 2024 Sep;21(3):845-855. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448344.172. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
2
Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with L4/5 grade-1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.L4/5 Ⅰ度退变性腰椎滑脱症患者斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的临床与影像学比较。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Jun;15(6):1477-1487. doi: 10.1111/os.13360. Epub 2023 May 8.
3
Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.机器人辅助微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与单节段腰椎滑脱症斜侧方腰椎体间融合术的疗效比较。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Oct;13(7):2093-2101. doi: 10.1111/os.13151. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
4
[Comparison of clinical effect and muscle injury imaging between oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis].斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术与经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术治疗单节段退变性腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效及肌肉损伤影像学比较
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2023 May 25;36(5):420-7. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2023.05.005.
5
Additional lateral plate fixation has no effect to prevent cage subsidence in oblique lumbar interbody fusion.额外的侧方板固定并不能防止斜外侧腰椎间融合术中的 cage 下沉。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Oct 11;16(1):584. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02725-7.
6
Clinical and Radiographic Comparisons among Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison with Three-Way Matching.微创腰椎椎间融合术的临床与影像学比较:与三向匹配的对比
Asian Spine J. 2022 Oct;16(5):712-722. doi: 10.31616/asj.2021.0264. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
7
Application of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Combined with Bridge-Locking Cage in Adjacent Segment Disease After Lumbar Fusion.斜外侧椎间融合联合桥接锁定 cage 在腰椎融合术后相邻节段疾病中的应用。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Dec;14(12):3268-3276. doi: 10.1111/os.13449. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
8
Stand-Alone Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) for the Treatment of Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD) after Previous Posterior Lumbar Fusion: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes and Comparison with Posterior Revision Surgery.独立斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF)治疗既往腰椎后路融合术后的相邻节段疾病(ASD):临床和影像学结果及与后路翻修手术的比较
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 20;12(8):2985. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082985.
9
Early effect of standalone oblique lateral interbody fusion vs. combined with lateral screw fixation of the vertebral body on single-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: A pilot study.单纯斜外侧椎间融合与联合椎体侧方螺钉固定治疗单节段腰椎退变性椎间盘疾病的早期疗效:一项初步研究。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2023;36(3):709-719. doi: 10.3233/BMR-220156.
10
Comparing stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion with posterior lumbar interbody fusion for revision of rostral adjacent segment disease: A STROBE-compliant study.比较单纯斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术与后路腰椎椎间融合术治疗头侧相邻节段疾病翻修:一项遵循STROBE规范的研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(40):e12680. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012680.

本文引用的文献

1
Should a Narrow Corridor Be a Contraindication for Performing Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Procedure or Not?狭窄通道是否应作为进行斜外侧椎间融合手术的禁忌证?
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):891-897. doi: 10.1177/21925682231216049. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
2
Comparing clinical and radiological outcomes between single-level OLIF and XLIF: A systematic review and meta-analysis.单节段斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF)与斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(XLIF)临床及影像学结果比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
N Am Spine Soc J. 2023 Apr 3;14:100216. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100216. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Influence of Preoperative Disability on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
术前残疾对接受腰椎前路椎间融合术患者临床结局的影响。
World Neurosurg. 2023 Mar;171:e412-e421. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.12.024. Epub 2022 Dec 10.
4
OLIF versus MI-TLIF for patients with degenerative lumbar disease: Is one procedure superior to the other? A systematic review and meta-analysis.退行性腰椎疾病患者的斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF)与改良经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MI-TLIF):一种手术方法是否优于另一种?一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2022 Oct 13;9:1014314. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1014314. eCollection 2022.
5
Revision lumbar fusions have higher rates of reoperation and result in worse clinical outcomes compared to primary lumbar fusions.与初次腰椎融合术相比,翻修腰椎融合术的再次手术率更高,临床结果更差。
Spine J. 2023 Jan;23(1):105-115. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.08.018. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
6
Successful Criteria for Indirect Decompression With Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.腰椎侧方椎间融合间接减压的成功标准
Neurospine. 2022 Sep;19(3):805-815. doi: 10.14245/ns.2244058.029. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
7
The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Disability on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.术前残疾严重程度对微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后患者报告结局及患者满意度的影响
World Neurosurg. 2022 Mar;159:e334-e346. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.051. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
8
Lumbar interbody fusion using oblique (OLIF) and lateral (LLIF) approaches for degenerative spine disorders: a meta-analysis of the comparative studies.使用斜外侧(OLIF)和外侧(LLIF)入路进行腰椎椎间融合治疗退行性脊柱疾病:比较研究的荟萃分析
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Jan;33(1):1-7. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-03172-0. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
9
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) versus Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) in Interbody Fusion Technique for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.椎间融合技术治疗退变性腰椎滑脱症中经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)与斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF)的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Life (Basel). 2021 Jul 15;11(7):696. doi: 10.3390/life11070696.
10
Incidence of adjacent-segment surgery following stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion.单纯腰椎外侧椎间融合术后相邻节段手术的发生率
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Jun 18;35(3):270-274. doi: 10.3171/2020.12.SPINE201218. Print 2021 Sep 1.