Hostler Christopher J, Krishnan Jay, Parish Alice, Baroco Allison, Cooper Penny, Donceras Onofre, Lautenbach Ebbing, Tolomeo Pam, Sansossio Tracy, Santos Carlos A Q, Schwartz David, Zhang Helen, Welbel Sharon, Lokhnygina Yuliya, Anderson Deverick J
Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 Oct 4;45(10):1-6. doi: 10.1017/ice.2024.99.
To evaluate postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing colon surgery who receive perioperative prophylaxis with ertapenem compared to other antibiotic regimens.
Multicenter retrospective cohort study among adults undergoing colon surgery in seven hospitals across three health systems from 1/1/2010 to 9/1/2015.
Generalized linear mixed logistic regression models were applied to assess differential odds of select outcomes among patients who received perioperative prophylaxis with ertapenem compared to other regimens. Postoperative outcomes of interest included surgical site infection (SSI), infection (CDI) and clinical culture positivity for carbapenem-resistant (CRE). Inverse probability weights were applied to account for differing covariate distributions across ertapenem and non-ertapenem groups.
A total of 2,109 patients were included for analysis. The odds of postoperative SSI was 1.56 times higher among individuals who received ertapenem than among those receiving other perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens in our cohort (46 [3.5%] vs 20 [2.5%]; IPW-weighted OR 1.56, [95% CI, 1.08-2.26], = .02). No statistically significant differences in odds of postoperative CDI (24 [1.8%] vs 16 [2.0%]; IPW-weighted OR 1.07 [95% CI, .68-1.68], = .78) were observed between patients who received ertapenem prophylaxis compared to other regimens. Clinical CRE culture positivity was rare in both groups (.2%-.5%) and did not differ statistically.
Ertapenem use for perioperative prophylaxis was associated with increased odds of SSI among patients undergoing colon surgery in our study population, though no differences in CDI or clinical CRE culture positivity were identified. Further study and replication of these findings are needed.
评估与其他抗生素方案相比,接受厄他培南围手术期预防用药的结肠手术患者的术后结局。
对2010年1月1日至2015年9月1日期间在三个卫生系统的七家医院接受结肠手术的成年人进行多中心回顾性队列研究。
应用广义线性混合逻辑回归模型,评估接受厄他培南围手术期预防用药的患者与其他方案相比,特定结局的差异比值。感兴趣的术后结局包括手术部位感染(SSI)、艰难梭菌感染(CDI)以及耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌(CRE)的临床培养阳性率。应用逆概率加权法来解释厄他培南组和非厄他培南组之间不同的协变量分布。
共纳入2109例患者进行分析。在我们的队列中,接受厄他培南治疗的个体术后发生SSI的几率比接受其他围手术期抗菌预防方案的个体高1.56倍(46例[3.5%]对20例[2.5%];逆概率加权法校正后的比值比为1.56,[95%置信区间,1.08 - 2.26],P = 0.02)。与其他方案相比,接受厄他培南预防用药的患者术后发生CDI的几率无统计学显著差异(24例[1.8%]对16例[2.0%];逆概率加权法校正后的比值比为1.07 [95%置信区间,0.68 - 1.68],P = 0.78)。两组中临床CRE培养阳性率均较低(0.2% - 0.5%),且无统计学差异。
在我们的研究人群中,结肠手术患者围手术期使用厄他培南与SSI几率增加相关,尽管在CDI或临床CRE培养阳性率方面未发现差异。需要对这些发现进行进一步研究和重复验证。