From the Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals of Leuven (SC, GD, DFH, MR, RV, LB, AN, RD, SR), Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Biomedical Sciences Group, University of Leuven (SC, GD, DFH, AN, HvV, SR) and Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (HvV).
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2024 Dec 1;41(12):873-880. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000002064. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
Chest wall surgery for the correction of pectus excavatum or pectus carinatum has gained increased interest in recent years. Adequate pain treatment, respiratory physiotherapy and early ambulation are key to improving the outcomes. Although thoracic epidural analgesia is highly effective, its safety is controversial, leading to extensive scrutiny and questioning of its role.
We hypothesise that thoracic epidural analgesia is effective and well tolerated to use in adolescents, with a high success rate and low pain scores.
Observational retrospective cohort study.
All adolescent cases in a high-volume academic tertiary chest wall surgery centre between March 1993 and December 2017 were included.
A total of 1117 patients aged from 12 to 19 years of age and receiving either Ravvitch, Nuss or Abramson chest wall reconstruction for pectus excavatum were identified in our institutional chest wall surgery database. After applying selection and exclusion criteria, 532 patients were included in the current analysis.
The primary endpoint of this study was the safety of epidural analgesia, assessed by the incidence of acute adverse events. Secondary endpoints were block success rates using a specific novel definition, and analgesic efficacy using recorded postoperative pain scores.
More than 60% of patients experienced one or more adverse events. However, all events were minor and without consequences. No serious or long-term adverse events were detected. The success rate of thoracic epidural placement was 81%. Low postoperative pain scores were observed.
Thoracic epidural analgesia is an extremely effective pain control technique, with a surprisingly high number of minor adverse events but safe with regard to serious adverse events.
The local research ethics committee approved and registered this study on 16 May 2022 (registration number: S66594).
近年来,用于矫正漏斗胸或鸡胸的胸壁手术引起了越来越多的关注。充分的疼痛治疗、呼吸物理治疗和早期活动是改善预后的关键。尽管胸段硬膜外镇痛效果显著,但它的安全性存在争议,导致人们对其作用进行了广泛的审查和质疑。
我们假设在青少年中使用胸段硬膜外镇痛是有效且耐受良好的,具有较高的成功率和较低的疼痛评分。
观察性回顾性队列研究。
纳入 1993 年 3 月至 2017 年 12 月期间在一个大容量学术三级胸壁外科中心接受 Ravvitch、Nuss 或 Abramson 胸壁重建术治疗漏斗胸的所有 12 至 19 岁青少年病例。在我们的胸壁外科数据库中,根据选择和排除标准,共确定了 1117 例患者。排除标准包括年龄小于 12 岁、同时行双侧手术、存在胸壁手术绝对禁忌证或既往胸部手术史。本研究最终纳入 532 例患者。
纳入标准为年龄 12 至 19 岁、因漏斗胸行 Ravvitch、Nuss 或 Abramson 胸壁重建术的患者。排除标准包括年龄小于 12 岁、同时行双侧手术、存在胸壁手术绝对禁忌证或既往胸部手术史。
本研究的主要终点是评估急性不良事件发生率的硬膜外镇痛安全性。次要终点是使用特定的新型定义评估阻滞成功率,以及记录术后疼痛评分评估的镇痛效果。
超过 60%的患者出现了 1 种或多种不良事件,但所有不良事件均为轻微,且无不良后果。未发现严重或长期不良事件。胸段硬膜外置管成功率为 81%。术后疼痛评分较低。
胸段硬膜外镇痛是一种非常有效的疼痛控制技术,尽管发生了相当多的轻微不良事件,但严重不良事件的风险较低。
当地研究伦理委员会于 2022 年 5 月 16 日批准并注册了本研究(注册号:S66594)。