Chapman Kathy L, Sitzman Thomas, Baylis Adriane, Hardin-Jones Mary, Kirschner Richard, Temkit M'hamed Hamy
Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Phoenix Children's Center for Cleft and Craniofacial Care a Division of Plastic Surgery, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025 Oct;62(10):1660-1675. doi: 10.1177/10556656241274242. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
AimsTo provide an overview of the Cleft Outcomes Research NETwork (CORNET) and the CORNET Speech and Surgery study. The study is (1) comparing speech outcomes and fistula rate between two common palate repair techniques, straight-line closure with intra-velar veloplasty (IVVP) and Furlow Double-Opposing Z-palatoplasty (Furlow Z-plasty); (2) summarizing practice variation in the utilization of early intervention speech-language (EI-SL) services; and (3) exploring the association between EI-SL services and speech outcomes.DesignProspective, longitudinal, observational, comparative effectiveness, multi-center.SitesTwenty sites across the United States.ParticipantsOne thousand two hundred forty-seven children with cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP ± L). Children with submucous cleft palate or bilateral sensorineural severe to profound hearing loss were excluded from participation.InterventionsStraight-line closure with IVVP or Furlow Z-plasty based on each surgeon's standard clinical protocol.Main Outcome Measure(s)The primary study outcome is perceptual ratings of hypernasality judged from speech samples collected at 3 years of age. Secondary outcomes are fistula rate, measures of speech production, and quality of life. The statistical analyses will include generalized estimating equations with propensity score weighting to address potential confounders.Current ProgressRecruitment was completed in February 2023; 80% of children have been retained to date. Five hundred sixty two children have completed their final 3-year speech assessment. Final study activities will end in early 2025.ConclusionsThis study addresses long-standing questions related to the effectiveness of the two most common palatoplasty approaches and describes CORNET which provides an infrastructure that will streamline future studies in all areas of cleft care.
目的
概述腭裂结局研究网络(CORNET)及CORNET语音与手术研究。该研究旨在:(1)比较两种常见腭裂修复技术——直线闭合术联合腭帆内肌肉成形术(IVVP)和弗洛氏双反向Z形腭裂修复术(弗洛氏Z形修复术)的语音结局和瘘管发生率;(2)总结早期干预言语语言(EI-SL)服务利用方面的实践差异;(3)探讨EI-SL服务与语音结局之间的关联。
设计
前瞻性、纵向、观察性、比较有效性、多中心研究。
地点
美国的20个地点。
参与者
1247例有或无唇裂的腭裂患儿(CP±L)。黏膜下腭裂患儿或双侧感音神经性重度至极重度听力损失患儿被排除在研究之外。
干预措施
根据每位外科医生的标准临床方案,采用IVVP直线闭合术或弗洛氏Z形修复术。
主要结局指标
主要研究结局是根据3岁时收集的语音样本判断的鼻音过重的感知评分。次要结局包括瘘管发生率、语音产生测量指标和生活质量。统计分析将包括采用倾向得分加权的广义估计方程,以解决潜在的混杂因素。
目前进展
2023年2月完成招募;迄今为止,80%的患儿被保留。562例患儿已完成最后的3年语音评估。最终研究活动将于2025年初结束。
结论
本研究解决了与两种最常见腭裂修复方法的有效性相关的长期问题,并介绍了CORNET,它提供了一个基础设施,将简化未来腭裂护理所有领域的研究。