Sari Hasan, Yavuz Yunus E, Kaleli Muhammed F, Kesriklioglu Serhat, Alsancak Yakup
Cardiology, Mut Statate Hospital, Mersin, TUR.
Cardiology, Siirt State Hospital, Siirt, TUR.
Cureus. 2024 Sep 3;16(9):e68531. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68531. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Introduction Ascending aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an aortic disease that can progress with serious complications. The roles of hyperlipidemia and inflammation in its etiology are controversial. In this study, we aimed to investigate the predictive value of indices that can indirectly reflect hyperlipidemia and inflammation in patients with AAA. Methods This prospective study included 146 patients diagnosed with AAA and 88 controls. Demographic data, clinical history and laboratory results, including the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), atherogenic coefficient (AC), pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), were collected. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the relationships between these indices and the aortic diameter. Results Patients with AAA presented significantly higher PIV levels than controls did (p>0.05). However, no significant differences were observed in the AIP, AC, or SII between the patient and control groups. Furthermore, no significant correlation was found between the aortic diameter and the studied indices (p<0.05). PIV was the only significant parameter with a p-value of 0.026 (AUC: 0.587) according to the ROC analysis. Conclusion These findings suggest that while hyperlipidemia, as measured by the AIP and AC, may not play a direct role in AAA progression, inflammation indicated by PIV could be an important factor. Especially in resource-limited settings, these useful indicators can improve AAA management before the disease progresses to an advanced stage.
引言 升主动脉瘤(AAA)是一种可进展并引发严重并发症的主动脉疾病。高脂血症和炎症在其病因中的作用存在争议。在本研究中,我们旨在探讨可间接反映AAA患者高脂血症和炎症的指标的预测价值。方法 这项前瞻性研究纳入了146例诊断为AAA的患者和88例对照。收集了人口统计学数据、临床病史和实验室结果,包括血浆致动脉粥样硬化指数(AIP)、致动脉粥样硬化系数(AC)、全免疫炎症值(PIV)和全身免疫炎症指数(SII)。进行统计分析以评估这些指标与主动脉直径之间的关系。结果 AAA患者的PIV水平显著高于对照组(p>0.05)。然而,患者组和对照组之间在AIP、AC或SII方面未观察到显著差异。此外,未发现主动脉直径与所研究指标之间存在显著相关性(p<0.05)。根据ROC分析,PIV是唯一具有显著意义的参数,p值为0.026(AUC:0.587)。结论 这些发现表明,虽然通过AIP和AC测量的高脂血症可能在AAA进展中不发挥直接作用,但PIV所表明的炎症可能是一个重要因素。特别是在资源有限的环境中,这些有用的指标可在疾病进展到晚期之前改善AAA的管理。