Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, USA.
mBio. 2024 Nov 13;15(11):e0251524. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02515-24. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
After centuries of relative stability, the scientific publishing world has undergone tremendous disruption and change during the first decades of the 21st century. The causes for disruption can be traced to the information revolution, which brought such benefits as rapid publication, greater connectivity, and ready access to large databases, along with less desirable practices including image manipulation, plagiarism, and other ethical transgressions. The information revolution has driven the proliferation of journals, expansion of for-profit academic publishing, and empowerment of the open-access movement, each of which has exerted new financial pressures on traditional publishing models. As journals became the focal point for ethical concerns in science, they have adapted by increasing the scope of their duties, which now include archiving of data, enforcement of good practices, establishment of standards for rigor, and training the next generation of reviewers and editors. Here, we consider the seismic changes occurring in scientific publishing and place them into the context of a rapidly changing landscape of scientific and publishing norms.
在 21 世纪的头几十年里,经历了数个世纪的相对稳定之后,科学出版界经历了巨大的颠覆和变革。造成这种颠覆的原因可以追溯到信息革命,它带来了快速出版、更强的连接性和对大型数据库的便捷访问,同时也带来了一些不太理想的做法,包括图像操纵、剽窃和其他违反道德规范的行为。信息革命推动了期刊的泛滥、营利性学术出版的扩张以及开放获取运动的壮大,这些都给传统出版模式带来了新的财务压力。由于期刊成为了科学界关注的焦点,它们通过增加职责范围来适应变化,现在的职责包括数据归档、执行良好的实践、制定严谨的标准以及培训下一代审稿人和编辑。在这里,我们将探讨科学出版领域正在发生的重大变革,并将其置于科学和出版规范快速变化的背景下进行考虑。