Double-anonymous peer review comes to JB.
作者信息
O'Toole George A
机构信息
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth , Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
出版信息
J Bacteriol. 2023 Oct 26;205(10):e0008022. doi: 10.1128/jb.00080-22. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Double-anonymous peer review comes to JB.双盲同行评审进入《英国医学杂志》。
J Bacteriol. 2023 Oct 26;205(10):e0008022. doi: 10.1128/jb.00080-22. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
2
The impact of double-blind peer review on gender bias in scientific publishing: a systematic review.双盲同行评审对科学出版中性别偏见的影响：一项系统综述。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jul;227(1):43-50.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.01.030. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
3
Same review quality in open versus blinded peer review in "Ugeskrift for Læger".《丹麦医学周刊》中开放同行评审与盲法同行评审的评审质量相同。
Dan Med J. 2012 Aug;59(8):A4479.
4
Cancer blues? A promising judgment bias task indicates pessimism in nude mice with tumors.癌症抑郁？一项有前途的判断偏差任务表明患有肿瘤的裸鼠表现出悲观情绪。
Physiol Behav. 2021 Sep 1;238:113465. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113465. Epub 2021 May 21.
5
WASH regulates the oxidative stress Nrf2/ARE pathway to inhibit proliferation and promote apoptosis of HeLa cells under the action of Jolkinolide B.WASH 通过调控氧化应激 Nrf2/ARE 通路抑制 Jolkinolide B 作用下的 HeLa 细胞增殖并促进其凋亡。
PeerJ. 2022 Jul 13;10:e13499. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13499. eCollection 2022.
6
Should anonymous and pseudonymous entities be cited or acknowledged?匿名和化名实体是否应该被引用或承认？
J Prof Nurs. 2021 Nov-Dec;37(6):1207-1209. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.08.014. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
7
Clinical spectrum of patients with erosion of the inner ear by jugular bulb abnormalities.颈静脉球异常导致内耳侵蚀患者的临床表现谱。
Laryngoscope. 2010 Feb;120(2):365-72. doi: 10.1002/lary.20699.
8
Pride and prejudice - What can we learn from peer review?《傲慢与偏见》——我们能从同行评审中学到什么？
Med Teach. 2020 Sep;42(9):1012-1018. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1774527. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
9
NMR second moment imaging using Jeener-Broekaert dipolar signals.使用吉纳-布勒卡特偶极信号的核磁共振二阶矩成像。
J Magn Reson. 2003 Jan;160(1):13-9. doi: 10.1016/s1090-7807(02)00034-4.
10
Jujuboside B Inhibits the Proliferation of Breast Cancer Cell Lines by Inducing Apoptosis and Autophagy.酸枣仁皂苷B通过诱导凋亡和自噬抑制乳腺癌细胞系的增殖。
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Sep 24;12:668887. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.668887. eCollection 2021.
引用本文的文献
1
The changing roles of scientific journals.科学期刊角色的转变。
mBio. 2024 Nov 13;15(11):e0251524. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02515-24. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
本文引用的文献
1
Peer review analysis in the field of radiation oncology: results from a web-based survey of the Young DEGRO working group.放疗领域的同行评议分析：一项 Young DEGRO 工作组网络调查的结果。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2021 Aug;197(8):667-673. doi: 10.1007/s00066-020-01729-2. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
2
Does double-blind peer review impact gender authorship trends? An evaluation of two leading neurosurgical journals from 2010 to 2019.双盲同行评审会影响作者性别趋势吗？对2010年至2019年两本领先神经外科期刊的评估。
J Neurosurg. 2021 Aug 1;135(2):352-360. doi: 10.3171/2020.6.JNS20902. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
3
Who knew? The misleading specificity of "double-blind" and what to do about it.谁曾想过？“双盲”的误导性及其应对措施。
Trials. 2020 Aug 5;21(1):697. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04607-5.
4
Peer review: single-blind, double-blind, or all the way-blind?同行评审：单盲、双盲还是全盲？
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Mar;31(3):481-483. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04187-2. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
5
Uptake and outcome of manuscripts in Nature journals by review model and author characteristics.《自然》系列期刊稿件基于评审模式和作者特征的录用情况及成果
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2018 Aug 17;3:5. doi: 10.1186/s41073-018-0049-z. eCollection 2018.
6
Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review.单盲与双盲同行评议中的评审偏倚。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Nov 28;114(48):12708-12713. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1707323114. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
Zotero 插件