Lee Kwang Seob, Jang Jaehyeok, Jang Hanmil, Kang Hyein, Rim John Hoon, Lim Jong-Baeck
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Pharmacology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Appl Lab Med. 2025 Mar 3;10(2):274-285. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfae103.
While the real-world impact of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equation change on clinical outcome in a longitudinal cohort setting is limited, external valuation of equation performance should be performed in different population cohorts. This study aimed to compare differential impacts of eGFR values, calculated by 5 equations in a Korean patient population, on clinical outcomes.
This retrospective longitudinal follow-up cohort study analyzed 23 246 participants with standardized creatinine/cystatin C assay-based laboratory results. The primary exposure was baseline eGFR calculated by 5 different equations including the recently developed 2021 race-free Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations. Clinical outcomes including all-cause mortality, renal replacement therapy, and albuminuria were analyzed to estimate the hazard ratio of the eGFR on clinical outcomes.
Among the 5 equations, CKD-EPI 2021 with creatinine and cystatin C (CKD-EPI 2021-CrCys) showed an earlier increase in hazard ratios for all clinical outcomes, while CKD-EPI 2012 with cystatin C showed a higher hazard ratio for all-cause mortality at low eGFR. Replacing CKD-EPI 2012 with CKD-EPI 2021-CrCys, 5.4% of patients with mortality and 3.3% of patients who received renal replacement therapy were reclassified to a lower risk stage.
The 2021 CKD-EPI equations were acceptable in a Korean population, with better predictive power for clinical outcomes when compared to previous equations. The updated race-free factors for eGFR calculation improved identification of patients at risk for clinical outcomes.
虽然估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)方程的变化对纵向队列研究中临床结局的实际影响有限,但应在不同人群队列中对方程性能进行外部评估。本研究旨在比较韩国患者人群中由5种方程计算得出的eGFR值对临床结局的不同影响。
这项回顾性纵向随访队列研究分析了23246名参与者,他们均有基于标准化肌酐/胱抑素C检测的实验室结果。主要暴露因素是通过5种不同方程计算得出的基线eGFR,其中包括最近开发的2021年无种族慢性肾脏病流行病学协作组(CKD-EPI)方程。分析了包括全因死亡率、肾脏替代治疗和蛋白尿在内的临床结局,以估计eGFR对临床结局的风险比。
在这5种方程中,含肌酐和胱抑素C的2021年CKD-EPI方程(CKD-EPI 2021-CrCys)对所有临床结局的风险比升高出现得更早,而含胱抑素C的2012年CKD-EPI方程在低eGFR时全因死亡率的风险比更高。用CKD-EPI 2021-CrCys取代2012年CKD-EPI方程后,5.4%的死亡患者和3.3%接受肾脏替代治疗的患者被重新分类到较低风险阶段。
2021年CKD-EPI方程在韩国人群中是可接受的,与之前的方程相比,对临床结局具有更好预测能力。更新后的无种族eGFR计算因子改善了对有临床结局风险患者的识别。