University of Oklahoma, College of Pharmacy, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Touro College of Pharmacy, New York, NY, USA.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2024 Nov;88(11):101301. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101301. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
The American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy's Social and Administrative Sciences Section and the American Pharmacists Association-Academy of Pharmaceutical Research and Science's Economic, Social and Administrative Sciences Section formed a Gender Equity Task Force to determine if there is evidence to suggest that there is gender disparity in pay; responsibilities; treatment by peers/colleagues, students, and administration; leadership opportunities; and rank, tenure status, and career advancement for Section members; and to develop recommendations to address existing disparities.
A Qualtrics survey was emailed in December 2020 to all American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy's Social and Administrative Sciences and American Pharmacists Association-Academy of Pharmaceutical Research and Science's Economic, Social and Administrative Sciences Section members. The questionnaire included items regarding favorability toward men or women in various academic domains (research, teaching, service, recruitment, mentoring, and advancement). Participants were asked if they had experienced gender inequity, and if so, at what type of institution and academic rank. The χ tests of independence and post hoc comparisons were used to assess item responses according to gender.
Of the respondents, 72% indicated that they had experienced gender inequity. Women and persons of color were more likely to do so. Women commonly reported that men received more favorable treatment in nearly all academic domains, whereas men reported that women and men were treated equally.
Pharmacy faculty specializing in social and administrative sciences reported experiences of gender inequity and perceptions of gender inequity. Perception gaps existed between male and female faculty in numerous academic domains. Colleges and schools of pharmacy should increase awareness of, and strive to self-assess, gender inequity in their institutions.
美国药学院协会社会与管理科学分会和美国药剂师协会-药学研究与科学学院经济、社会与管理科学分会成立了一个性别平等工作组,以确定是否有证据表明在薪酬、职责、同行/同事、学生和管理层的待遇、领导机会以及分会成员的职级、任期和职业发展方面存在性别差异,并制定解决现有差距的建议。
2020 年 12 月,向所有美国药学院协会社会与管理科学分会和美国药剂师协会-药学研究与科学学院经济、社会与管理科学分会成员发送了一份 Qualtrics 调查。问卷包括关于在各种学术领域(研究、教学、服务、招聘、指导和晋升)中对男性或女性的偏好的项目。参与者被问及他们是否经历过性别不平等,如果有,是在什么类型的机构和学术职级上。使用独立性 χ 检验和事后比较根据性别评估项目回答。
在回答者中,72%表示他们经历过性别不平等。女性和少数族裔更有可能这样做。女性普遍报告说,男性在几乎所有学术领域都受到更有利的待遇,而男性则报告说,女性和男性受到平等对待。
专门从事社会和管理科学的药学教师报告了性别不平等的经历和对性别不平等的看法。在许多学术领域,男性和女性教师之间存在看法差距。药学院和药学院应提高对机构内性别不平等的认识,并努力进行自我评估。