The influence of proliferative tissue on Hounsfield unit and its correlation with BMD in middle-aged and elderly patients with lumbar degenerative diseases.

PURPOSE

The difference of Hounsfield Unit (HU) value in different regions of L3 vertebra in middle-aged and elderly patients with lumbar degeneration diseases (LDD) was analyzed. To investigate the influence of proliferative tissue on HU value of cancellous bone and its correlation with bone mineral density (BMD).

METHODS

The medical records of middle-aged and elderly patients with LDD in our hospital from December 2020 to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into osteophyte group and no-osteophyte group according to the presence or absence of osteophyte formation on lumbar spine X-ray. In osteophyte group, cancellous bone HU value, containing cortical bone overall HU value and containing osteophyte overall HU value in L3 vertebra were measured on the lumbar CT cross-section. In no-osteophyte group, only the cancellous bone HU value and the containing cortical bone overall HU value were measured. Differences in HU value in different regions of the L3 vertebral body were compared within and between groups of middle-aged and elderly patients with LDD, respectively. To investigate its effect on cancellous bone HU measurements and to do a correlation analysis with patients' BMD.

RESULTS

A total of 115 patients with LDD were included in this study, including 65 males and 50 females, with an average age of 67.83 ± 6.59 years. The results of the study showed no statistical differences in age (P = 0.15), gender (P = 0.57), smoking (P = 0.88), drinking history (P = 0.76), medical history (P > 0.05) and BMI(P = 0.29) between the two groups. In osteophyte group, the mean cancellous bone HU value was 98.00 ± 25.50 HU, the containing cortical bone overall HU value was 189.02 ± 46.18 HU, and the containing osteophyte overall HU value was 232.69 ± 56.01 HU. The overall HU values containing cortical bone and containing osteophyte were significantly higher than cancellous bone HU value (P < 0.001). In no-osteophyte group, the mean cancellous bone HU value was 102.04 ± 19.64 HU, and the containing cortical bone overall HU value was 175.00 ± 28.97 HU, which was statistically significantly different (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in cancellous bone HU value and the containing cortical bone overall HU value between the two groups (P > 0.05). The results of the Pearson correlation analysis showed a significant correlation between the cancellous bone HU value of the L3 vertebrae and the QCT BMD value of the patients (r = 0.95, P < 0.001). However, there was no significant correlation between containing cortical bone overall HU value and containing osteophyte overall HU value and the patient's QCT BMD value (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Vertebral HU value is an alternative measurement that effectively reflects the patient's BMD. In middle-aged and elderly LDD patients, HU values in different areas of L3 vertebra are significantly different, and hyperplastic tissues such as cortical bone and osteophytes may exponentially lead to higher HU value in patients. Compared with other measurement areas, vertebral cancellous bone HU value have the advantage of accurately assessing patients' BMD.