Owens Christopher, Buchanan Elizabeth, Fisher Celia B
Department of Health Behavior, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Research Administration, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, USA.
J Rural Health. 2025 Mar;41(2):e12886. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12886. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
Many rural areas lack brick-and-mortar HIV prevention resources despite the increasing rates of HIV. Although online HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) programs can potentially increase uptake among rural sexual minority men (SMM), their attitudes and preferences regarding telehealth-based PrEP (telePrEP) programming are uncertain. This qualitative study examined rural SMM's perceived risks and benefits of participating in a hypothetical telePrEP program.
Twenty rural SMM living in Texas completed a semi-structured online videoconferencing interview between April 12 and June 14, 2023. Data were analyzed with reflexive thematic analysis.
Four themes were constructed: (1) telePrEP interventions increase accessibility but completely online services might be inadequate; (2) telePrEP and mail-order interventions are convenient but face challenges; (3) telePrEP interventions need to address confidentiality and privacy within the context of the sociopolitical climate; and (4) telePrEP interventions need to address trustworthiness and transparency.
Overall, our results indicate that rural SMM perceive telePrEP interventions that provide at-home and telehealth PrEP, HIV testing, and HIV care services as beneficial. However, overall utility and acceptability depend on perceptions of privacy, confidentiality, trustworthiness, and transparency. Given the HIV prevention and treatment service deserts in which many rural SMM live, telePrEP interventions must purposefully demonstrate how their operations and data will remain safe and secure. Further work should explore contextual or situational factors that influence the willingness and acceptability of rural SMM to participate in online HIV prevention intervention research studies.
尽管艾滋病毒感染率不断上升,但许多农村地区缺乏实体的艾滋病毒预防资源。虽然在线艾滋病毒暴露前预防(PrEP)项目有可能提高农村性少数男性(SMM)的接受率,但他们对基于远程医疗的PrEP(远程PrEP)项目的态度和偏好尚不确定。这项定性研究调查了农村SMM参与一个假设的远程PrEP项目所感知到的风险和益处。
2023年4月12日至6月14日期间,20名居住在德克萨斯州的农村SMM完成了一次半结构化的在线视频会议访谈。采用反思性主题分析法对数据进行分析。
构建了四个主题:(1)远程PrEP干预增加了可及性,但完全在线的服务可能不足;(2)远程PrEP和邮购干预很方便,但面临挑战;(3)远程PrEP干预需要在社会政治环境背景下解决保密性和隐私问题;(4)远程PrEP干预需要解决可信度和透明度问题。
总体而言,我们的结果表明,农村SMM认为提供居家和远程医疗PrEP、艾滋病毒检测及艾滋病毒护理服务的远程PrEP干预是有益的。然而,总体效用和可接受性取决于对隐私、保密性、可信度和透明度的认知。鉴于许多农村SMM生活在艾滋病毒预防和治疗服务匮乏的地区,远程PrEP干预必须有针对性地展示其运营和数据将如何保持安全可靠。进一步的工作应探索影响农村SMM参与在线艾滋病毒预防干预研究意愿和可接受性的背景或情境因素。