• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

剖析英国公共资助的成人社会护理对与护理相关的生活质量的影响。一项面板数据分析。

Unpacking the care-related quality of life effect of England's publicly funded adult social care. A panel data analysis.

作者信息

Salas-Ortiz Andrea, Longo Francesco, Claxton Karl, Lomas James

机构信息

Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.

Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, York, UK.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2025 Feb;34(2):246-266. doi: 10.1002/hec.4907. Epub 2024 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1002/hec.4907
PMID:39367872
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11700955/
Abstract

Adult Social Care (ASC) is the publicly-funded long-term care program in England that provides support with activities of daily living to people experiencing mental and/or physical challenges. Existing evidence suggests that ASC expenditure improves service users' care-related quality of life (CRQoL). However, less is known about the channels through which this effect exists and the effect on outcomes other than CRQoL. We fill this gap by analyzing survey data on ASC service users who received long-term support from 2014/15 to 2019/20 using panel data instrumental variable methods. We find that the beneficial impact of ASC expenditure on the CRQoL of both new and existing users is mostly driven by users aged 18-64 without any learning disability and users with no learning disability aged 65 or older receiving community-based ASC. Moreover, control over daily life, occupation, and social participation are the CRQoL domains that are improved the most. We also find that ASC expenditure has a beneficial effect on several other outcomes beyond CRQoL for both new and existing users including user satisfaction and experience, the ability to carry out activities of daily living independently, whether their home is designed around needs, accessibility to local places, general health, and mental health through reduced anxiety and depression. Greater ASC expenditure, however, does not address the need for other forms of support such as unpaid informal and privately-funded care.

摘要

成人社会护理(ASC)是英格兰的一项公共资助长期护理计划,为面临精神和/或身体挑战的人们提供日常生活活动方面的支持。现有证据表明,ASC支出可改善服务使用者与护理相关的生活质量(CRQoL)。然而,对于这种影响存在的渠道以及对CRQoL以外的结果的影响,我们了解得较少。我们通过使用面板数据工具变量方法分析2014/15年至2019/20年期间接受长期支持的ASC服务使用者的调查数据来填补这一空白。我们发现,ASC支出对新用户和现有用户CRQoL的有益影响主要由18 - 64岁且无任何学习障碍的用户以及65岁及以上无学习障碍且接受社区ASC服务的用户推动。此外,对日常生活、职业和社会参与的控制是CRQoL改善最为显著的领域。我们还发现,ASC支出对新用户和现有用户除CRQoL之外的其他几个结果也有有益影响,包括用户满意度和体验、独立开展日常生活活动的能力、其住所是否根据需求设计、当地场所的可达性、总体健康状况以及通过减轻焦虑和抑郁改善心理健康状况。然而,更多的ASC支出并不能满足对其他形式支持的需求,如无偿非正式护理和自费护理。

相似文献

1
Unpacking the care-related quality of life effect of England's publicly funded adult social care. A panel data analysis.剖析英国公共资助的成人社会护理对与护理相关的生活质量的影响。一项面板数据分析。
Health Econ. 2025 Feb;34(2):246-266. doi: 10.1002/hec.4907. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
2
Is extending eligibility for adult social care better than investing more in existing users in England? A cross-sectional evidence for multiple financial years.在英格兰,延长成人社会护理资格的期限是否优于在现有使用者身上投入更多资金?跨多个财政年度的横截面证据。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 11;13(9):e070833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070833.
3
Does public long-term care expenditure improve care-related quality of life of service users in England?在英格兰,公共长期护理支出是否能提高服务使用者的与护理相关的生活质量?
Health Econ. 2021 Sep;30(10):2561-2581. doi: 10.1002/hec.4396. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
4
The impact of long-term care on quality of life.长期护理对生活质量的影响。
Health Econ. 2018 Mar;27(3):e43-e58. doi: 10.1002/hec.3612. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
5
Are reasons for care-giving related to carers' care-related quality of life and strain? Evidence from a survey of carers in England.照顾的原因与照顾者的照顾相关生活质量和压力有关吗?来自英格兰照顾者调查的证据。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Jan;27(1):151-160. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12634. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
6
Does Publicly-Funded Adult Social Care Impact Informal and Unpaid Carers' Quality of Life in England?英国公共资助的成人社会护理是否会影响非正式和无偿护理人员的生活质量?
Health Econ. 2025 Jul;34(7):1217-1238. doi: 10.1002/hec.4957. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
7
Intersecting factors of disadvantage and discrimination and their effect on daily life during the coronavirus pandemic: the CICADA-ME mixed-methods study.新冠疫情期间不利因素与歧视的交叉影响及其对日常生活的作用:CICADA-ME混合方法研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/KYTF4381.
8
Investigating the economic case of a service to support carers of people with dementia: A cross-sectional survey-based feasibility study in England.调查一项支持痴呆症患者照顾者服务的经济案例:基于横断面调查的英格兰可行性研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Sep;27(5):e734-e743. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12799. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
9
Validity and test-retest reliability of the self-completion adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT-SCT4) with adults with long-term physical, sensory and mental health conditions in England.成人社会护理结果自填式工具包(ASCOT-SCT4)在英格兰患有长期身体、感官和心理健康问题的成年人中的效度及重测信度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Aug 18;15(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0739-0.
10
Longitudinal analysis of local government spending on adult social care and carers' subjective well-being in England.对英格兰地区政府用于成人社会关怀和护理人员主观幸福感支出的纵向分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 23;11(12):e049652. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049652.

本文引用的文献

1
Is extending eligibility for adult social care better than investing more in existing users in England? A cross-sectional evidence for multiple financial years.在英格兰,延长成人社会护理资格的期限是否优于在现有使用者身上投入更多资金?跨多个财政年度的横截面证据。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 11;13(9):e070833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070833.
2
Causal impact of social care, public health and healthcare expenditure on mortality in England: cross-sectional evidence for 2013/2014.社会关怀、公共卫生和医疗保健支出对英格兰死亡率的因果影响:2013/2014 年的横断面证据。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 15;11(10):e046417. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046417.
3
Does public long-term care expenditure improve care-related quality of life of service users in England?在英格兰,公共长期护理支出是否能提高服务使用者的与护理相关的生活质量?
Health Econ. 2021 Sep;30(10):2561-2581. doi: 10.1002/hec.4396. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
4
Long-term care spending and hospital use among the older population in England.英国老年人口的长期护理支出和医院使用情况。
J Health Econ. 2021 Jul;78:102477. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102477. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
5
Investigating the relationship between social care supply and healthcare utilization by older people in England.调查英国老年人的社会护理供给与医疗保健利用之间的关系。
Health Econ. 2021 Jan;30(1):36-54. doi: 10.1002/hec.4175. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
6
Does formal home care reduce inpatient length of stay?正规家庭护理是否会减少住院时间?
Health Econ. 2020 Dec;29(12):1620-1636. doi: 10.1002/hec.4158. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
7
Time to care? The effects of retirement on informal care provision.关爱时间?退休对非正式护理提供的影响。
J Health Econ. 2020 Sep;73:102350. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102350. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
8
Effects of health and social care spending constraints on mortality in England: a time trend analysis.英国医疗与社会护理支出限制对死亡率的影响:一项时间趋势分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 15;7(11):e017722. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017722.
9
The impact of long-term care on quality of life.长期护理对生活质量的影响。
Health Econ. 2018 Mar;27(3):e43-e58. doi: 10.1002/hec.3612. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
10
Informal care and long-term labor market outcomes.非正式护理与长期劳动力市场结果。
J Health Econ. 2017 Dec;56:1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Sep 15.