Suppr超能文献

剖析英国公共资助的成人社会护理对与护理相关的生活质量的影响。一项面板数据分析。

Unpacking the care-related quality of life effect of England's publicly funded adult social care. A panel data analysis.

作者信息

Salas-Ortiz Andrea, Longo Francesco, Claxton Karl, Lomas James

机构信息

Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.

Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, York, UK.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2025 Feb;34(2):246-266. doi: 10.1002/hec.4907. Epub 2024 Oct 5.

Abstract

Adult Social Care (ASC) is the publicly-funded long-term care program in England that provides support with activities of daily living to people experiencing mental and/or physical challenges. Existing evidence suggests that ASC expenditure improves service users' care-related quality of life (CRQoL). However, less is known about the channels through which this effect exists and the effect on outcomes other than CRQoL. We fill this gap by analyzing survey data on ASC service users who received long-term support from 2014/15 to 2019/20 using panel data instrumental variable methods. We find that the beneficial impact of ASC expenditure on the CRQoL of both new and existing users is mostly driven by users aged 18-64 without any learning disability and users with no learning disability aged 65 or older receiving community-based ASC. Moreover, control over daily life, occupation, and social participation are the CRQoL domains that are improved the most. We also find that ASC expenditure has a beneficial effect on several other outcomes beyond CRQoL for both new and existing users including user satisfaction and experience, the ability to carry out activities of daily living independently, whether their home is designed around needs, accessibility to local places, general health, and mental health through reduced anxiety and depression. Greater ASC expenditure, however, does not address the need for other forms of support such as unpaid informal and privately-funded care.

摘要

成人社会护理(ASC)是英格兰的一项公共资助长期护理计划,为面临精神和/或身体挑战的人们提供日常生活活动方面的支持。现有证据表明,ASC支出可改善服务使用者与护理相关的生活质量(CRQoL)。然而,对于这种影响存在的渠道以及对CRQoL以外的结果的影响,我们了解得较少。我们通过使用面板数据工具变量方法分析2014/15年至2019/20年期间接受长期支持的ASC服务使用者的调查数据来填补这一空白。我们发现,ASC支出对新用户和现有用户CRQoL的有益影响主要由18 - 64岁且无任何学习障碍的用户以及65岁及以上无学习障碍且接受社区ASC服务的用户推动。此外,对日常生活、职业和社会参与的控制是CRQoL改善最为显著的领域。我们还发现,ASC支出对新用户和现有用户除CRQoL之外的其他几个结果也有有益影响,包括用户满意度和体验、独立开展日常生活活动的能力、其住所是否根据需求设计、当地场所的可达性、总体健康状况以及通过减轻焦虑和抑郁改善心理健康状况。然而,更多的ASC支出并不能满足对其他形式支持的需求,如无偿非正式护理和自费护理。

相似文献

4
The impact of long-term care on quality of life.长期护理对生活质量的影响。
Health Econ. 2018 Mar;27(3):e43-e58. doi: 10.1002/hec.3612. Epub 2017 Nov 3.

本文引用的文献

6
Does formal home care reduce inpatient length of stay?正规家庭护理是否会减少住院时间?
Health Econ. 2020 Dec;29(12):1620-1636. doi: 10.1002/hec.4158. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
7
Time to care? The effects of retirement on informal care provision.关爱时间?退休对非正式护理提供的影响。
J Health Econ. 2020 Sep;73:102350. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102350. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
9
The impact of long-term care on quality of life.长期护理对生活质量的影响。
Health Econ. 2018 Mar;27(3):e43-e58. doi: 10.1002/hec.3612. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
10
Informal care and long-term labor market outcomes.非正式护理与长期劳动力市场结果。
J Health Econ. 2017 Dec;56:1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Sep 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验