• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在“哈哈镜”工厂内:社交媒体如何扭曲规范认知。

Inside the funhouse mirror factory: How social media distorts perceptions of norms.

机构信息

Psychology Department, New York University, USA.

Department of Psychology Center for Neural Science, New York University, Norwegian School of Economics, USA.

出版信息

Curr Opin Psychol. 2024 Dec;60:101918. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101918. Epub 2024 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101918
PMID:39369456
Abstract

The current paper explains how modern technology interacts with human psychology to create a funhouse mirror version of social norms. We argue that norms generated on social media often tend to be more extreme than offline norms which can create false perceptions of norms-known as pluralistic ignorance. We integrate research from political science, psychology, and cognitive science to explain how online environments become saturated with false norms, who is misrepresented online, what happens when online norms deviate from offline norms, where people are affected online, and why expressions are more extreme online. We provide a framework for understanding and correcting for the distortions in our perceptions of social norms that are created by social media platforms. We argue the funhouse mirror nature of social media can be pernicious for individuals and society by increasing pluralistic ignorance and false polarization.

摘要

本文解释了现代技术如何与人的心理相互作用,从而产生了社会规范的哈哈镜版本。我们认为,社交媒体上产生的规范往往比线下规范更为极端,这可能会造成对规范的错误认知,即所谓的“多元无知”。我们整合了政治学、心理学和认知科学的研究成果,解释了在线环境如何充斥着虚假规范,哪些人在网上被歪曲,当在线规范偏离线下规范时会发生什么,人们在哪些方面受到影响,以及为什么网上的表达更为极端。我们提供了一个理解和纠正社交媒体平台造成的社会规范认知扭曲的框架。我们认为,社交媒体的哈哈镜性质可能会通过增加多元无知和虚假极化,对个人和社会造成有害影响。

相似文献

1
Inside the funhouse mirror factory: How social media distorts perceptions of norms.在“哈哈镜”工厂内:社交媒体如何扭曲规范认知。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2024 Dec;60:101918. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101918. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
2
How Different Uses of Social Media Inform Perceptions of Offline Social Norms and Changes in Vaccine Intentions.社交媒体的不同用途如何影响人们对线下社会规范的认知和疫苗接种意愿的变化。
Health Commun. 2024 May;39(6):1198-1208. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2207284. Epub 2023 May 4.
3
Social perceptions going online: Exploring the impact of social media food content exposure on perceptions of food norms.走向网络的社会认知:探究社交媒体上食物内容曝光对食物规范认知的影响。
Appetite. 2025 Feb 1;206:107803. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107803. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
4
The Impact of Laws on Norms Perceptions.法律对规范认知的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 Jul;47(7):1071-1083. doi: 10.1177/0146167220959176. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
5
Misperceived eating norms: Assessing pluralistic ignorance in the food environment.误解的饮食规范:评估食物环境中的多元化无知。
Appetite. 2022 Dec 1;179:106284. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106284. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
6
Behavioral contagion on social media: Effects of social norms, design interventions, and critical media literacy on self-disclosure.社交媒体中的行为传染:社会规范、设计干预和批判性媒体素养对自我表露的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 19;16(7):e0254670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254670. eCollection 2021.
7
Trick or Drink: Offline and Social Media Hierarchical Normative Influences on Halloween Celebration Drinking.不给糖就捣蛋还是喝酒:线下和社交媒体对万圣节庆祝饮酒的层级规范性影响。
Health Commun. 2021 Dec;36(14):1942-1948. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1808406. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
8
Drinking Buddies: The Importance of Proximal Norms in Emerging Adults' Alcohol-Related Private and Public Social Media Use.酒友:近端规范在新兴成年人与酒精相关的私人及公共社交媒体使用中的重要性
Health Commun. 2023 Dec;38(14):3301-3315. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2022.2148086. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
9
Perceptions of social norms and exposure to pro-marijuana messages are associated with adolescent marijuana use.对社会规范的认知以及接触支持大麻的信息与青少年使用大麻有关。
Prev Med. 2016 Dec;93:171-176. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.10.013. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
10
What Does It Meme? A Qualitative Analysis of Adolescents' Perceptions of Tobacco and Marijuana Messaging.它有何寓意?青少年对烟草和大麻信息看法的定性分析。
Public Health Rep. 2020 Sep/Oct;135(5):578-586. doi: 10.1177/0033354920947399. Epub 2020 Aug 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Can science-based interventions tamp down polarization?基于科学的干预措施能压制两极分化吗?
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jan 28;122(4):e2500158122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2500158122. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
2
Sanctioning political speech on social media is driven by partisan norms and identity signaling.社交媒体上对政治言论的制裁是由党派规范和身份信号驱动的。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Nov 22;3(12):pgae534. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae534. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
The offline roots of online hostility: Adult and childhood administrative records correlate with individual-level hostility on Twitter.
线上敌意的线下根源:成人和儿童行政记录与 Twitter 上的个体层面敌意相关。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Oct 29;121(44):e2412277121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2412277121. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
4
Attraction to politically extreme users on social media.对社交媒体上政治极端用户的吸引力。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Oct 15;3(10):pgae395. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae395. eCollection 2024 Oct.